[crash]

Originally Posted by Back9

1) Are you denying that R22 AC systems will be forced to replace?


2) Can you provide convincing refutations of the 5 points raised? (Not to mention those mentioned in the article and video?)


.

This is an article like margarine is one molecule away from being plastic.

I went to the University of California at Irvine where the research was first done on this. The science is real unlike putting items together to support what you want the conclusion to be.

[Back9]

Originally Posted by WindyCityzen

Stupidest thing I’ve read today.

This has been in the works for over 20 years.

1) Maybe we've all been "had" for 20 years (anthropogenic global warming is an example of that).

2) Can you provide convincing refutations of the 5 points raised?
(Not to mention other issues raised in the article and video?)

[Back9]

Originally Posted by crash

This is an article like margarine is one molecule away from being plastic.

I went to the University of California at Irvine where the research was first done on this. The science is real unlike putting items together to support what you want the conclusion to be.

1) You have not provided any refutations of the serious problems of the "ozone depletion" ... argument.

2) "The science is real":

a) that's not an argument, it is assertive bombast

b) that's what we hear from the anthropogenic climate quacks who end up falsifying data.

[ColdNoMore]

Originally Posted by GoPacers

Thanks for the info. I'll bring this up at the next meeting of the Flat Earth Society.

Perfect response.