![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
. . ABSOLUTELY! I suggested this very same thing in previous Thread on this topic. Good to hear it seems to work there. I believe THIS would be equitable to both sides. I am on the NOT-ANONYMOUS side, but we should observe and control deed restrictions etc. THIS is a perfect solution IMO. . . . |
Quote:
|
The answer to this problem
Quote:
|
I’m picturing both sides of this issue. The problem as I see it is that we shouldn’t have to be in this situation. You would think The Villages would hire 20-25 people who’s job it is to drive each Village, take pictures, and report at the end of their shift any violations. Otherwise why have anyone sign the deed restriction paper when they buy if your not going to patrol your property with your own inspectors for violations. What’s happening here is they are doing it the cheep way. Rely on us to spy and tell on each other. This should not have to be.
|
Designated complainer
I would not rat out my neighbors even if they painted their house purple.
However, maybe someone who feels strongly should post their phone number and agree to be the designated complainer. Then every person who objects to the occasional purple house could call their complaint into the designated complainer who would turn the offending homeowner. |
I just reported one this morning; some idiot put a “Biden” sticker on the gate arm where St. Charles exits to Buena Vista. Hard to see on the arm but for 25 years I was paid to see stupid things that stupid people do.
|
Quote:
|
It's very sad that a 18" white cross would **** someone off.
|
yup, certainly sounds like we moved to the friendliest home town anywhere around
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Always easy to say there is no problem until it is the house next to you that has the toilet and old car in the front yard. Then the complaints start about the loss of home values and "someone" needs to do something. One thing that could be done is to hold contractors responsible for the infractions they are responsible for putting in place. Contractors can also have customers sign off on changes that break the deed restrictions and hold the resident responsible at that point.
The biggest thing is there are rules and ignorance of the rules is not an excuse especially when there are resources readily available to provide all the information you need. |
Quote:
We have lived here since 2007. The only complaint I ever made was the dumping of yard waste at the Sable Chase postal station after Irma. I called twice and spoke with Janet Tut. First time I called it was a large pile, second time I called the pile wrapped around the parking area and was as tall as the station. Ms Tut told me they had posted a request that people NOT do that. I inquired why since we were paying for yard waste removal and not getting the service, WHY couldn’t the Villages use that money to post employees at the various dumping grounds. I don’t live in Sable Chase but I was quite offended but that particular sight. So the poster is correct the Villages really does nothing that might cost them something. The debris was not taken away till the pick up resumed. I know, I know there was a problem all over the state with pick up, however that does not negate the continued allowance of dumping at postal stations. ESPECIALLY after complaints. So to take the stance we need to keep the community standard so it will keep values up, how did THAT LOOK? |
Deed restrictions
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.