![]() |
archives
Quote:
https://archive.ph/ https://archive.is/ZqVwM |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The drone probably captured stained roof. We villagers know stained roofs are bad:eclipsee_gold_cup: also I would think there minimum altitude that drones can fly over private property?
|
From the Wall Street Journal article:
“The technology is way ahead of any consumer protections,” said Douglas Heller, director of insurance at the Consumer Federation of America. Some of the concerns would be: privacy, inaccurate or old photos, wrong photos. |
Who do you you feel is THE BEST, reliable, honest, home roofers in our area?
A Village realtor mentioned that Florida just passed new laws regarding roof replacements! Has anyone heard if, and how they modified Florida’s insurance laws! My concern is that my roof is 13 years old. Just had an inspection and the inspector said it still looks very tight. Thanks |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If Florida there is an expectation of privacy defined in FS 934.50 but it would likely not be applicable in this instance as there is a level of inherent consent for examination of the insured property when the contract was entered into. This discussion is all hypothetical as there in not enough facts and information in the OP to make a complete evaluation of the situation. |
Quote:
https://archive.is/ZqVwM |
Here is the skinny on Drone use…
Minding my drone business: U.S. home insurance companies are using drones to expose damaged roof shingles, yards full of combustible junk, and swimming pools and trampolines homeowners failed to tell them about. An invasion of privacy? Nope. If it’s out in the open, you can legally photograph it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
roofing inspectors being replaced permanently. . |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.