Originally Posted by Aviator1211 (Post 2210679)

Certainly, if an individual stood in front of a performance stage and continuously screamed over the performers, that individual would be quickly ushered out of the venue. So, how many screams is acceptable? 200 per hour, 100 per hour? 50 per hour? Of course, out of respect for the band and the audience, the only acceptable and enforceable number is zero screams per hour.

We tried Spanish Springs again last night, unfortunately, the Screamer was there showing his disrespect worse than ever. If The Villages wants to revitalize Spanish Springs, perhaps they should begin by silencing the Screamer.

If you agree that zero screams per hour is the correct limit, please let the officials at the square know your feelings.

Originally Posted by Aviator1211 (Post 2210812)

I've seen him walking back to his cart. After he leaves the square there is no screaming, no odd behavior. Perfectly normal. He can clearly turn it on and off at will.

Originally Posted by charlieo1126@gmail.com (Post 2210813)

I’ve been smoking that controlled substance since I was a teenager ,I’m now 84 . I can tell you that screaming is not one of the byproducts of that controlled substance .

Originally Posted by Kelevision (Post 2210821)

Go to Sumter Landing.

Originally Posted by roob1 (Post 2210828)

After he leaves the square, the degree of visual and auditory stimulation is greatly reduced. Possibly that is why his behavior changes.

Concluding he can turn it on and off at will is a naive conclusion.

Originally Posted by Aviator1211 (Post 2210838)

Wonderful you have avoided the common long-term effects. Others have not been so lucky.

Long-Term Risks of Cannabis Use | Health | Province of Manitoba

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2210844)

Interesting article. Reading carefully, it seems safer than cigarettes and alcohol with a possible effect on memory, concentration, and motivation which could result in poor grades or poor work performance. As a retired person who is not taking classes, there isn't much risk to me.

Originally Posted by Aviator1211 (Post 2210838)

Wonderful you have avoided the common long-term effects. Others have not been so lucky.

Long-Term Risks of Cannabis Use | Health | Province of Manitoba

Originally Posted by DrHitch (Post 2210737)

Yes, his name is Mark and yes, in person, he's a nice quiet gentle guy.

In fact, he's told me that he's been quite upset by the snarky looks, comments and actions of some people.

We are snowbirds and hang at Spanish Springs. This guy is part of the fun and ambience and certainly isn't harming anyone although he may be loud sometimes (vocally and visually)...sigh!

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 (Post 2210868)

"Mark" may seem a very nice, but his actions can be very startling and disrupting. Certainly he knows that his "antics" (for lack of a better word) are what brings him the looks and comments that upset him. Like an alcoholic or a drug addict who knows their triggers, if they want to avoid negative effects they need to find alternative activities and entertainment to the ones that trigger the negative behavior.
So, if "Mark" is at the square and acting out, he is fully aware that he is doing it (startling people and being disruptive).

Originally Posted by charlieo1126@gmail.com (Post 2210867)

hmmmm less dangerous then all the pizza and big steaks eaten by many here , everything in moderation , I was smart enough and quick enough to last 40 years in some of the worst places in the world and collecting a 6 figure pension for 24 years , so a little weed and little Miles , Coltrane and Ahmad Jamal makes Charlie a happy guy

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 (Post 2210871)

I got the impression he was screaming because he is enjoying the music not to upset other people.

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 (Post 2210879)

He may be. But he does upset others and is obviously aware of the responses he receives. So?

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 (Post 2210872)

Good for you!

Now, back to our regularly scheduled discussion, "The Screamer".