Originally Posted by justjim (Post 1838747)

The Villages Developer overall has done a great job designing and building this Senior Adult Community called The Villages. If you ask them, they would say “we would do a few things different but overall we are pleased”. 99% of residents would agree. We can trust them to do what is right with this new concept of apartment living. IMHO they have a reputation to protect and they live around here too. Fore!

Originally Posted by Girlcopper (Post 1838540)

Are you willing to pay half a million for a house in TV? Yes, its nice here but theres better places to live for that amount of money

Originally Posted by Scott O (Post 1838495)

The reality is, it will probably look no different than the multiple Assisted and Independent living units that are everywhere throughout The Villages. So why is everyone getting so riled up? .

Originally Posted by justjim (Post 1838747)

The Villages Developer overall has done a great job designing and building this Senior Adult Community called The Villages. If you ask them, they would say “we would do a few things different but overall we are pleased”. 99% of residents would agree. We can trust them to do what is right with this new concept of apartment living. IMHO they have a reputation to protect and they live around here too. Fore!

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 1838567)

They are installing fire poles & slides.

Originally Posted by Two Bills (Post 1838805)

The poles are for the dancers!:icon_wink:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1838192)

I think that your figures are based on how many CAN be built. I think it will be a three storey building much like the Lofts and much like the independent living building next to Bob Evans on 466. Usually figures established tell how many POSSIBLE units and the tallest they CAN be. But you could be right.

But you could be wrong too. We will see. I so hope I am right and everyone will be pleased. I am really worried about these new commissioners and their goals. Having someone in sync with the developer has allowed all permitting and processes to go smoothly, but someone could if they wanted, be obstructive, throw a monkey wrench into that. If it hurts The Villages, it hurts all of us. So far this place has been an enormous success story, building and giving employment to many people. Supporting excellent Charter Schools, keeping restrictions that cause homes to be well kept. There is always an element of politics for and against big business. I worry about the commissioner that switched parties just before he was elected.

I hope that The Villages builds a beautiful building and landscapes it like they always do and have a lovely pool and that older people who want to rent will find a nice place to rent and all this criticism is put to rest.

Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna (Post 1838189)

There have been lots of words written recently about the apartments to be built at the Hacienda Hills CC site. How about some arithmetic?

—The 7 acre site has 308,00 sq.ft. of buildable space.

— If we make a conservative assumption that 3 acres of the site will be required for the resort pool, walking trails, and other recreational amenities promised by the Developer, the buildable portion of the site is reduced to 176,000 sf.

— The amount of buildable space will be further reduced by the space required for surface parking for apartment residents and guests cars and golf carts, and modest landscaping around the building. At standard “striping sizes” and assuming 1/4 acre of landscaping, those items further reduce the buildable surface on the site by about 75,000 sf, further reducing the buildable surface to about 101,000 sf.

— At an average size of 1,200 sf, the 286 apartments will require 343,000 sf. Add in a 20% factor for hallways and other common areas and there will be 412,000 sf under roof. No allocation has been made for the promised restaurant or restaurant parking.

The arithmetic indicates that the new structure will average slightly more than 4 stories in height. If resident parking and a restaurant are added “under roof”, the structure would average closer to 5 stories in height. If parking for the apartments is provided under ground, the height of the structure could be maintained at about 4 stories.

All that arithmetic being considered, fitting a resort pool, pool structure, restaurant, golf starting facilities, walking paths and other sports amenities, all promised by the Developer, onto only 3 acres of land seems to be a tall order

I’ve tried to be transparent in how I arrived at my conclusions. Feel free to change whatever assumptions you’d like and see what conclusions you reach.

Originally Posted by Choro&Swing (Post 1838839)

I’m not certain, but I believe the report I read about yesterday specified a maximum of 64’ high. There might be a parapet above the top floor and a flat roof with the air conditioning up there. There might also be shingled roofs with roof trusses, say 4 in 12. That would be included in the height, and that would take up six feet. The first floor may well be several feet above ground level.

So I agree with you: four stories. How many elevators?

Originally Posted by Choro&Swing (Post 1838839)

I’m not certain, but I believe the report I read about yesterday specified a maximum of 64’ high. There might be a parapet above the top floor and a flat roof with the air conditioning up there. There might also be shingled roofs with roof trusses, say 4 in 12. That would be included in the height, and that would take up six feet. The first floor may well be several feet above ground level.

So I agree with you: four stories. How many elevators?

Originally Posted by John41 (Post 1838879)

According to the internet a 4 story building would be 40 feet high.