Talk of The Villages Florida
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, General Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/)
-   -   Increases coming to CDD? (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/increases-coming-cdd-348625/)

Bill14564 03-20-2024 09:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tophcfa (Post 2313748)
Wow, what a convoluted, misguided, and contradictory post. Here’s the litmus test. Would the people referenced be allowed in the home without paying rent? If the answer is no, it’s a business. Family and friends who stay with residents for free are house guests of residents. People who pay rent to stay in someone’s home, while they concurrently live there, are customers of a business. Any reasonable person looking objectively would draw the same conclusion. Justify it any way that floats your boat, it’s a business being run out of a home.
I'm tired of typing the same thing over and over. I have addressed this in previous posts - go back and look.

tophcfa 03-20-2024 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2313750)
I'm tired of typing the same thing over and over. I have addressed this in previous posts - go back and look.
Seen them all, and I’m tired of correcting you. I guess we agree to disagree.

Bill14564 03-20-2024 09:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tophcfa (Post 2313752)
Seen them all, and I’m tired of correcting you. I guess we agree to disagree.
Sounds good

golfing eagles 03-21-2024 04:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tophcfa (Post 2313748)
Wow, what a convoluted, misguided, and contradictory post. Here’s the litmus test. Would the people referenced be allowed in the home without paying rent? If the answer is no, it’s a business. Family and friends who stay with residents for free are house guests of residents. People who pay rent to stay in someone’s home, while they concurrently live there, are customers of a business. Any reasonable person looking objectively would draw the same conclusion. Justify it any way that floats your boat, it’s a business being run out of a home.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2313750)
I'm tired of typing the same thing over and over. I have addressed this in previous posts - go back and look.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tophcfa (Post 2313752)
Seen them all, and I’m tired of correcting you. I guess we agree to disagree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2313754)
Sounds good
Which is why any entity---developer or CDD---will incur significant legal costs if they take this issue on.

BrianL99 03-21-2024 05:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tophcfa (Post 2313752)
Seen them all, and I’m tired of correcting you. I guess we agree to disagree.
Sometimes corrections just don't take. Remember that old "joke ink" that used to be around when we were kids? You could "erase it" and 5 minutes later, it was back again. Like a 3 Stooges skit.

jimjamuser 03-21-2024 11:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2313780)
Which is why any entity---developer or CDD---will incur significant legal costs if they take this issue on.
I thought that the developer had an ARMY of lawyers.

Topspinmo 03-21-2024 11:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 2314056)
I thought that the developer had an ARMY of lawyers.
No, only tax cheats do…:crap2:

Maker 03-21-2024 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2312899)
The covenant says that the Developer MAY enforce internal restrictions. It doesn't say that they WILL enforce them.
If it says the DEVELOPER and not the CDD, then this is a non issue.

If the developer decides to hire the CDD to do that, not sure if the CDD can engage in that due to how their organization exists under Florida law. Certainly not on the shoulders of resident's and their wallets.

golfing eagles 03-21-2024 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 2314056)
I thought that the developer had an ARMY of lawyers.
And they work for free????? :1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

BrianL99 03-21-2024 06:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2313780)
Which is why any entity---developer or CDD---will incur significant legal costs if they take this issue on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maker (Post 2314071)
If it says the DEVELOPER and not the CDD, then this is a non issue.

If the developer decides to hire the CDD to do that, not sure if the CDD can engage in that due to how their organization exists under Florida law. Certainly not on the shoulders of resident's and their wallets.
The Developer owns those rights. They are part of the "Bundle of Rights" that are included (or not included) when you purchase land. That part of the "bundle", the Developer retained and he can most likely assign those rights to anyone he wishes. He can certainly contract out, enforcement of those rights.

Sooner or later, there's going to be lawsuit over the restrictions & covenants and I suspect who ever gets sued (Developer, CDD, whoever) is going to spend a small fortune, defending.

oldtimes 03-22-2024 07:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2313780)
Which is why any entity---developer or CDD---will incur significant legal costs if they take this issue on.
That's what's wrong with the country. It has become too expensive to prosecute so companies just absorb the loss and pass it on.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM.
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.