If drinking the koolaid is the last thing you do then you should be ok if you use a breathing straw:loco:.

The CDD is the arm of the developer - the developer is the one that ultimately bears responsibility. I've seen many posts where he is lauded by the residents. It will be interesting to see if he steps up to the plate and does what is right.

I have seen many posts where the same posters seem to enjoy bashing The Morse family and often offer simplistic and largely incorrect summaries that make it appear that the developers are little more than a bunch of crooks.

I think part of their disdain is based on the fact that the Morses do not espouse the same political ideals as those posters and maybe partly because in the last ten years they have become very rich using the American principle of free enterprise.

On this issue that the IRS has ruled, there have been no laws broken and no blame placed. it is an issue on whether a CDD has the right to issue tax deductible bonds and it is a premise and an entity they are investigating unlike any entity ever in this country. Sad, because this entity is working nicely.

It is my very uneducated opinion based on listening to educated opinions that this issue will be debated in courts of law for a very long time and probably long after I am dead.

Those of us that are younger and potentially have 30+ years left ARE watching this issue before deciding on the Villages. I know I don't want to pay for someone else's mistake.

And as far as bashing the Morse family, some take it personal. This isn't personal. This is business. And quite frankly while they did a outstanding job with the business some of their decisions have been questionable

Personally I feel the developers to date have done a fantastic job of planning, building, operating and maintaining the infrastructure and amenities at very reasonable costs to the residents. I seriously doubt a "real" government could have done nearly as well and certainly not remotely as cost effectively or efficiently. Moreover The Villages's grounds, rec centers, pools and so on are better designed, prettier, cleaner and better run and maintained than any I have seen offered by any municipal government - anywhere. IMHO a well run private company can almost always beat a lethargic inefficient and costly bureaucratic government elephant at just about anything - and still make a profit. My compliments to the Morses on a truly world class development!

My concern relates to what unanticipated costs and quality of maintenance and service issues Villagers are likely to face in the future. Those who have been on board up until now have without question been able to reside in a lovely environment, have access to numerous recreational opportunities and enjoy a wonderful lifestyle, all at reasonable cost. Congratulations to them for spotting and moving to The Villages at a great time!

It will probably be years before the iRS issue is resolved. Indeed in the meantime many other issues, both related and unrelated, may arise. On the upside the developers are politically and economically powerful and no doubt have access to the best legal counsel available. On the downside someone must pay all the costs. In any successful business all costs are eventually passed on to the customers; in the immediate case that would be Villagers.

Well said. :agree:

Hey! It doesn't matter that you are younger or 73 like me...by the way...here in this place, 70 is the new 40!

We aren't idiots any of us. We are investing the biggest hunk of money in our lives, most of us in our home. We all or mostly all knew about the ongoing IRS investigation and tried to make some sense of it. But many very monetarily conservative people chose to live here.

This isn't a baby game, we all can make our own decisions. I am glad we bought our first home five years ago and are still enjoying it every bit as much today. We are in our sixth year of joyful living that I personally did not expect to have in my golden years.

And of course there are all kinds of risks buying in any neighborhood, anywhere. Our quite nice neighborhood near Cincy that we left has a few houses not kept up as spiffily as they once were and that neighborhood at the age of 25 isn't quite as pretty as it once was. Meth labs spring up in toney suburbs, drugs are creeping into suburbia, things ain't what they used to be and there are no iron clad guarantees.

There is risk in any thing we do.

And no one can tell anyone what they should do.

I think the Morses run things like any good business does, they try to take advantage of any kind of situation that will pul money in the coffers, but they have risked that money time and time again. I would have quit with my first ten million and bought a house here and just stopped. They probably aren't angels but I don't think they are devils either...and fortunately I was not born yesterday. I am quite old as you pointed out. ;)

What I would do if trying to make a decision like this is scope out the worst case scenario - i.e., the IRS prevails on everything and the residents are forced to cough up all of the money. It was stated above that the IRS claims that it is due $354 million. Sounds like a crushing financial burden doesn't it? However, remember that TV is huge. We currently have roughly 100,000 residents which probably translates to 55-60,000 households. Let's assume 55,000. Taking the $354 million and allocating it to 55,000 households means that the worst case scenario is that each household would have to come up with $6,436. That's not an insignificant amount of money, but only you can determine if that amount is sufficient to keep you from buying into what TV has to offer. Note, however, that with increasing house prices, that $6,436 can easily be gobbled up with a year's worth of appreciation. You can wait this out and buy several years down the road, but almost certainly you will be paying a lot more for your house then than what you stand to lose because of this IRS stuff.

That's my opinion.

I was not a resident when the IRS violation took place, what part of the $6,436 would I be obligated to pay? Seeing the real estate company and the owner I dealt with did not disclose this to me will they have to pay? Seeing I did not contract with anyone in TV for $6,436 worth of anything will the IRS bill me direct? Seeing I did not commit the violation why would I be expected to participate in the financial punishment and possible have a lean put on my house and have it taken away for something I did not do?

Ditto

This is far from over, and when it is there MAY be some kind of settlement. I don't blame the Morses, they follow the advice of their attorneys etc. they don't come up with this stuff on their own. There are MANY other CDD's in the country that have done the same and will be impacted. I for one will not loose any sleep!