blueash |
11-14-2020 08:51 AM |
I am trying to understand the contention that all is fine as it was your postal worker who signed the form.
Quote:
Just a nice courtesy if you want to avoid a trip to the post off just to sign a reciept
|
Quote:
it was released and signed for by a Federal postal Employee
|
That it was signed for by someone other than Ed or a member of his household is a problem. It may be Covid. Apparently nobody, including me, has in these several days called the post office to see if the rules have changed. If I were to go to mail an item, signature required and as I handed it to the postal clerk she signed the form saying the item had been delivered because, after all, it was in the hands of the USPS and that was sufficient proof of delivery to the recipient, no one would say that is ok.
USPS's website is very clear that the recipient is to sign the form. It does get a bit tricky as of course here, the final address is not in fact your home. It is the postal station. But if it were ok for the postal worker to sign we would not have all the reports about having to go to the Lady Lake PO to pick up packages because you weren't at home.
The signature form as posted in the image above seems to say S FitzPatrick in cursive, then printed with some address including a route number. No effort to deceive as apparently the employee did not sign Ed's name. My guess is the rules have changed but if so I'd have hoped the USPS website would reflect the change which makes signature required a meaningless service as there is no proof the package got to the addressee.
That the form posted has recipient's name, with Ed and actual recipient's name with Ed is false. The option for a variation is that someone in a household or business can sign, thus I might sign for a package addressed to Mrs Blueash or a receptionist might sign for a package sent to the Ace Repair Shoppe. The form on Ed's package says Ed signed as the actual recipient. He did not.
|