Originally Posted by Two Bills (Post 2209507)

There is a report on the "other" site this morning of a CYV being reported for wrong shingles on roof.
They were there when buyer purchased home.
Multiple/many/several/ quite a few, other roofs of same material/color are also out of compliance in same location, but have not been reported.
Going to be a costly lesson.
May have even been a "Free" roof.

Originally Posted by Cobullymom (Post 2209535)

Wow, exactly why I left, Karen..

Originally Posted by Nucky (Post 2209625)

Well,well,well. Are you certain that there were no other posts on this subject since 2005 that you should have looked into before starting this thread? This is definitely Karma in action. What a waste of flowers. I feel bad for you Bogie. Take it easy on the next newbie who you want to roast for their post because it’s been discussed before. Each post is important to each poster.

Originally Posted by Vermilion Villager (Post 2209696)

How do you know if it was the same individual if they are all anonymous? I know the community standards people who contact you do not have any information about the person filing the complaint.

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 2209725)

The complaints were emailed in with the same email address, shared by the Community Standards rep.

Originally Posted by charlieo1126@gmail.com (Post 2209703)

wrong she hired the roofer in 2020 to put new roof on ,the fault is on her not anyone else , it’s tough but buyer beware, almost all the roofers doing business in the villages know these rules and have to get building permits , it should have been caught before it was completed

Originally Posted by rustyp (Post 2209464)

Another battle I would like to see is if a home inspection is made and a covenant violation was not identified then the inspection company should be financially liable for correction. None of this BS of returning the cost of the inspection.

Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 2209702)

You have made a good point about "FLOWERS". But, don't forget that "flowers" usually have a stalk that supports the "flowers" up to some certain height. Suppose that the stalk height is 3 ft or 4 ft. Now we have a bush with flowers and that could present a visual safety hazard for oncoming vehicles;
......Now that 13 ft back from the street seems WAY excessive, maybe 5 or 6 ft would be reasonable.
.......At the exit of the Southside pool there is a large bush that forces cars to go out into the middle of the street in order to see if other cars are coming. That is a safety hazard created by plants and it is 2 ft from the road and it is on Village property, not a resident's.
.......The excessive plants on ALL the roundabouts create a traffic safety hazard.
........Just saying that it is possible for plants to create a LEGITIMATE hazard and therefore a need to be written up.
........I can't make a judgment in this particular case because there are other factors like is the street straight or does it curve. And other factors.

Originally Posted by Two Bills (Post 2209732)

Yep. Misread it.
Early in morning before coffee is my only excuse.

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2209647)

Because these weren't neighbors. They were people living in one area of the villages, reporting people living in a different part of the villages. They don't really care that these peoples' yards violate code, because they have no need or reason to ever be in those neighborhoods. They have an axe to grind. Either they think Community Standards doesn't work hard enough, or they had violations on their own property and they want everyone else to suffer, or maybe they aren't even residents of the Villages at all, and just want to annoy Villagers because it's a trendy thing to do.

Originally Posted by TerryCamlin (Post 2209671)

Wow from reading these negative mean comments you folks need a lesson in compassion. Do you wake up everyday thinking how can I make some commenter today feel miserable? Yes rules were in place but give me a break we are talking beautiful flowers how on earth could this be a violation?? Trolling is absolutely wrong. You have an issue with somebody give your name otherwise you are just a coward,

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 2209458)

It's none of "perhaps" which you post.

It's a troll, 25 complains and on a street the complainer probably does not live.

Yes, a real coward's way.

Speaks volumes about the person.

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 2209458)

It's none of "perhaps" which you post.

It's a troll, 25 complains and on a street the complainer probably does not live.

Yes, a real coward's way.

Speaks volumes about the person.