Laker14 |
08-24-2022 04:20 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainger99
(Post 2129060)
The question was “What about the claim The Villages charges higher-than-average market rates for rent?”
He doesn’t say that they don’t charge higher than average market rates. The question wasn’t whether the villages charges too much rent for businesses to survive. Obviously businesses do survive.
He says that it is a “myth that The Villages charges too much rent for businesses to be able to survive.” A tenant might be able to survive paying higher than average rents - but may still be paying above average rents.
The guy’s ability to not answer the question shows that he should be in politics. If you don’t like the question, give a non-answer that appears to be an answer.
|
He should have attacked the question. "Average rent?" What is "average". We all know that the value of real estate is entirely based upon its location, hence the appropriate rent is also. So when we are talking about "average" rent, are we comparing the rent that Red Sauce pays per square foot, in Lake Sumter Landing to the cost per square foot in a strip mall between TV and Ocala?
Are we assuming that Winn Dixie pays a lot more per square foot in LSL than it will on the corner of 466A and Micro Race Track Rd? Well, what do you think the value of that real estate is now? 15 years ago it was not much, but today? It may well command just as much, if not more, than LSL due to the higher traffic flow and access for non TV residents.
I agree with you that he didn't answer the specific question. But he did a good job of explaining that the rent charged is not why businesses fail. They fail because whoever put the business plan together made a miscalculation of how attractive and profitable their enterprise would be, based upon the rent and the traffic flow that location would provide.
I had a colleague who put his dental practice in a mall. This was in the late 1970s when malls were still attractive for shoppers. The rent was high, but the traffic flow was tremendous. It didn't work for him because the mall traffic wasn't what you wanted to build a dental practice around. He got a disproportionate amount of walk-ins, rather than folks who were looking for a "dental home". Who wants to drive to the mall and park a half-mile away for a dental appointment?
My point is that the mall wasn't charging too much rent for its space. Heck, the hot pretzel shop right next to him was there for 30 years. The failure to put a business appropriate for the location was entirely his fault.
BTW, he moved his practice about a mile to a single building off of a busy road with an appropriately sized parking lot and had a fabulously successful practice and career.
|