Originally Posted by Villageswimmer (Post 1752128)

I think it’s impossible to correlate degree of risk to chronology of the outbreak. Look at numbers all you want but, essentially, nothing has changed to miraculously make things ok now. People believe what they want to believe. I hope the optimists are correct.

For example, some folks think if they wear a mask, they don’t need to keep six feet distance. People are sick of all this but the fact remains it only takes one time.

Now they’re going to think they’re completely safe if outside in sun and humidity.

Originally Posted by Villageswimmer (Post 1752128)

I think it’s impossible to correlate degree of risk to chronology of the outbreak. Look at numbers all you want but, essentially, nothing has changed to miraculously make things ok now. People believe what they want to believe. I hope the optimists are correct.

For example, some folks think if they wear a mask, they don’t need to keep six feet distance. People are sick of all this but the fact remains it only takes one time.

Now they’re going to think they’re completely safe if outside in sun and humidity.

Originally Posted by LiverpoolWalrus (Post 1752057)

Probably little or nothing, but good catch. The info has likely been published elsewhere but the POA happened to be the source of the information for me. I agree it could be misleading.