| Pturner |
09-06-2010 07:23 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taj44
(Post 290092)
The VHA has a reputation of being an extension of the Developer, with the Developer's interests in mind. The POA, although at times in the past a little strident, has clearly had the interests of the residents at heart. The Vision/Objective of the POA is to make The Villages an even better place in which to live, where Residents’ Rights are respected, and local government is responsive to the needs and interests of residents. I think that says it all.
In addition to being an independent homeowners organization devoted to the residents' needs, POA membership also offers many discounts to local businesses. Personally, I look forward to the POA newsletter each month. It keeps us up to speed on issues that affect us. I think we are fortunate to have the POA looking out for us.
|
I think they are both worthwhile organizations.
I was not here back when the POA was strident. As for now, I agree with all of Taj44's positive comments about it. In addition to affording us discounts and publishing an informative newsletter, two facts alone prove the value of the POA to all TV homeowners.
The POA:
- Secured a pledge of $40 million+ worth of additional funding to maintain and improve our amenities.
- Listens to all TVers-- members of the POA and non-members alike-- in support of it's mission. For example, it changed its tone in response to our wishes.
It is no insult to the developer to support this valuable organization. Indeed, it makes no sense to me to object to an independent group of homeowners reviewing our TV governance.
Membership is only $10 a year. It would take all of us several lifetimes just to repay the $40 million investment it obtained on our behalf. Does anybody want to give that investment back? If not, please invest $10 annually in membership. |
