I don't find the comments snarky at all....
 

if proximity to a post office is a priority to you then it is very simple to find out before you move how far they are. If a person is so sensitive that simple sarcasm seems snarky to that person then perhaps that person might be a bit too sensitive.

Living here you get to experience all sorts of good things and a lot of complaints....which are usually the fault of those complaining because they refuse to check ahead of time if what they want is available.

To be fair to the OP, how many of us thought to check the location of post offices before moving here?

The USPS website says it has "31,606 Postal Service-managed retail offices" which is one for every 10,000 people. So it would not be unreasonable to expect one in each of our three towns - one for every 40,000 people.

Sure, if you specifically want a Trader Joe's or a branch of Citibank then you should check before moving here, but a post office?

I did have a thought that maybe the developer wanted to charge too much rent and the USPS wasn't prepared to pay it, but then I remembered that The Villages is perfect, so that idea couldn't possibly be true.

Oh stop. Just like I will defend almost anything about my hometown, The Villages, there are others who can't bear to be positive about it. Yes, it has flaws, but we can't make both of the Democrats move, that would be unkind.

Actually, I thought the way the OP worded the post was the snarky bit. If you're going to start out snarky, expect snark in return.

There was only one post office for my town of Muskegon, population 60,000 at the time. I think we're awash with POs and package mailing stores here. I've never had it so good.

I have a different take. In my opinion, there should be no post offices anywhere. With a 19 trillion dollar debt, we should let UPS and FEDEX take over the entire mail system. And, don't tell me that USPS doesn't cost anything. Those USPS employees who say it don't want to count the cost for retiree pensions and health insurance. Huge cost to the taxpayers. When is our country going to get smart?

It is the 21st Century. You can go online and schedule the PO to pick up the package at your house.

I really don't know... when indeed?

The Postal Service receives NO tax dollars for operating expenses and relies on the sale of postage, products and services to fund its operations.

Maybe for "operating" expenses. But, what about the guy who retired at age 55 with a 70 percent of salary pension, and health insurance for the rest of his life, and he lives to age 85 or 90? There are thousands of retired USPS employees who are collecting these benefits, and the current employees are guaranteed to also collect the benefits for life. The USPS does not want to count this huge taxpayer expense as an operating expense. The notion that the USPS does not cost the taxpayers money is deceptive or "fake news". In fact, the USPS currently costs the taxpayers 18 billion dollars per year. All of this money could be saved by just letting the private sector take over, and it would create thousands of "real" jobs.

The notion that the USPS is losing money is fake news...
The Truth about Postal Finances: USPS by the Numbers >> The Truth about Postal Finances: USPS by the Numbers

What if your credit card company told you: “You will charge a million dollars on your credit card during your life; please enclose the million dollars in your next bill payment. It’s the responsible thing to do.”

Be Careful What You Assume | USPS Office of Inspector General