rubicon |
02-06-2013 08:50 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Kiefer
(Post 621812)
We have 106 homes in our neighborhood, 105 were opposed to the modification and the remaining one was the accused. The project was started without the required permits from Architectural Review Committee ( the contractor said the plans had been approved and somehow misplaced). The ARC subsequently denied the project three times as not being aesthetically conforming with the neighborhood. The issue was then appealed to our District Board of Supervisors who overturned the three ARC denials. The reason; basically, aesthetics are in "THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER". Our neighborhood concluded; a resident can do just about anything they want to do as long as it is not clearly and SPECIFICALLY spelled out in the deed restrictions..
|
The outcome here is sad and may set precedent. The thing that TV had going for it was the ARC approval which protected residents.
The POA as a watchdog has to respond in kind. The period you refer too was such a period and what some call negative was the POA protecting residents interests.
The VHA had the Developer's blessing and contribution and was organized to compete directly against the POA which the Developer beleieved was a thorn in his side. However he issued this caveat that if they ever did anything he disapproved of or ws against him then he would withdraw his support . If you look closer you will notice the VHA is a quasi-public relation organization for the Developer. If you look even closer you will see that each of the past VHA presidents end up as a Board of Directors Southwest Water District, Village hospital Board ,etc. I will leave other to put a label on these moves.
I do not belong to either organization but if I did decide to support one it would be the POA
|