Originally Posted by Rainger99 (Post 2134345)

With respect to pets, it seems that there are three types of people.
They are

1) people who love them and think everyone else should love them.
2) people who don't like them and don't want other people bringing their pets onto their lawns or in stores or restaurants and they don't want to live next to neighbors who have noisy pets.
3) people who are neutral - they don't care either way.

I am attempting to come up with a solution where all sides are satisfied. Would it be possible to have one of the new villages be pet-free? You would know going in that you couldn't have a pet and that none of your neighbors could have one.

This would seem to satisfy all parties. If you loved pets, you would probably have more neighbors with pets in those villages that allowed pets. If you didn't love pets, you would live in a village where pets are not allowed - people from an adjacent village could not walk their dogs in the pet-free villages.

And if you are neutral on pets, you could decide if you wanted to live in a village that allowed pets or you could decide if you wanted to live in a pet-free village. This would seem to be a win-win-win. You could live where you wanted and everyone should be satisfied.

But would it work?

Originally Posted by Kenswing (Post 2134388)

So you’re pinning the success of your little project on the “hope” that someone from the Developer sees this thread and feels it’s worthy to take action on? That has to be the weakest commitment to a project I have ever seen. lol

Originally Posted by Oldragbagger (Post 2134395)

I have seen similar discussions on other sites so there must be interest out there. We personally would love to have an opportunity to live in a pet free village. Barking dogs can absolutely ruin your enjoyment of your home and neighborhood. We came here from a neighborhood that had a number of dogs that would start barking the moment their owners left the house and could go for hours. Two of them barked constantly at us every time we sat on our back porch even if the owners were home. They apparently weren’t bothered enough about it to address the problem. It was a key reason for us moving.

Dogs using our yard as a latrine is a less serious problem but my husband does have to pick up a pile or two sometimes before he can mow the lawn, which just shouldn’t be.

As far as pets in restaurants and stores, living in a pet free village would not be an answer to that anyway. That’s a societal thing and in no way unique to The Villages.

We used to travel extensively in our RV and if we had an option of a pet free park, especially for longer stays, we would usually take advantage of it. There are so many people who travel with dogs and then leave them locked up in an RV all day while they sight see and it’s not hard to guess what some of the dogs choose to do with their time……bark.

We do not dislike dogs per se. We always had them when our daughter was young because she was such an animal lover. And it’s usually not the dogs fault that they are a problem, it’s irresponsible owners who do not train them properly and do not control them so that they aren’t a nuisance to others. It’s our experience with those dogs that has soured us on dogs in general so that we have chosen not to own them and are not interested in having our lives impacted by people who do. Bottom line, someone else’s choice to own a dog shouldn’t become our problem or have a negative impact on our life as we choose not to have them for a reason.

So, yes, if there was a pet free village being offered we would absolutely be on board to buy there and I have talked to others who have expressed the same to me. I don’t think they’d have any problem selling those houses. I agree that there might be a premium for them.

Originally Posted by cynjim (Post 2134504)

Wow :some of the replys go from no pets pet free zone no kids yelling in a pool no adult children living with their parents which may exclude parents who need their help.....maybe all who have complaints about living here for one reason or another should just go to a deserted island and you can be all by yourself thinking about just yourself and doing what you want to by yourself. SO many complaints so little time... :shrug:

Originally Posted by Sandy and Ed (Post 2134515)

On second thought, what a great idea! How about the new villages being built?? Leave the established ones as is then those that don’t like the present condition where they live can move down to the new communities with the new anti-pet restrictions

Originally Posted by Rainger99 (Post 2134345)

With respect to pets, it seems that there are three types of people.
They are

1) people who love them and think everyone else should love them.
2) people who don't like them and don't want other people bringing their pets onto their lawns or in stores or restaurants and they don't want to live next to neighbors who have noisy pets.
3) people who are neutral - they don't care either way.

I am attempting to come up with a solution where all sides are satisfied. Would it be possible to have one of the new villages be pet-free? You would know going in that you couldn't have a pet and that none of your neighbors could have one.

This would seem to satisfy all parties. If you loved pets, you would probably have more neighbors with pets in those villages that allowed pets. If you didn't love pets, you would live in a village where pets are not allowed - people from an adjacent village could not walk their dogs in the pet-free villages.

And if you are neutral on pets, you could decide if you wanted to live in a village that allowed pets or you could decide if you wanted to live in a pet-free village. This would seem to be a win-win-win. You could live where you wanted and everyone should be satisfied.

But would it work?

Originally Posted by Whitley (Post 2134588)

Would the deserted island have a Costco?

Originally Posted by Rainger99 (Post 2134345)

With respect to pets, it seems that there are three types of people.
They are

1) people who love them and think everyone else should love them.
2) people who don't like them and don't want other people bringing their pets onto their lawns or in stores or restaurants and they don't want to live next to neighbors who have noisy pets.
3) people who are neutral - they don't care either way.

I am attempting to come up with a solution where all sides are satisfied. Would it be possible to have one of the new villages be pet-free? You would know going in that you couldn't have a pet and that none of your neighbors could have one.

This would seem to satisfy all parties. If you loved pets, you would probably have more neighbors with pets in those villages that allowed pets. If you didn't love pets, you would live in a village where pets are not allowed - people from an adjacent village could not walk their dogs in the pet-free villages.

And if you are neutral on pets, you could decide if you wanted to live in a village that allowed pets or you could decide if you wanted to live in a pet-free village. This would seem to be a win-win-win. You could live where you wanted and everyone should be satisfied.

But would it work?