Sinkhole coverage would not pay for this loss. There has to be structure damage. Land is not covered.

If you lived in California and there was an earthquake. would you expect or could you expect the builder of your development to help you?

Sinkhole In Sabal Chase
 

What insurance companies are selling sinkhole insurance for Pre-owned homes?

You mis-understood my question. I was not asking for the developer to pay, I was asking for guidance if it did happen. Are you saying no one has any advice as to whom to talk to and it is every man for himself?

HoleState Insurance

I am sorry I misunderstood you. I apologize.

I know that the people who repair show up and I am guessing that Community Watch has that information.

I wasn't aware that there was another sinkhole on Hillsbourgh! Where is that one?

Please feel free to disagree if I am naïve, and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but....
According to the US Geologic Survey, TV is approx. 32 sq mi = 5280x5280x32=892,108,800 sq ft. If the avg lot is 10,000 sq ft and the avg home footprint 4,000 sq ft(probably high), then the odds of a single sinkhole on your property is 1:89,211 and opening under your structure 1:223,027. Also, according to the USGS map, there have been approx. 30 sinkholes in all of Sumter County reported since 1954. The FL DEC map shows somewhat more, but they include septic system collapse and water main breaks on their map. So lets go with 2 sinkholes/year in the confines of TV (also probably high).
If you have a total loss, you are covered under "catastrophic ground collapse" term of your insurance. You need "sinkhole" coverage if you have damage but the home is still inhabitable. So let's say the average repair cost of non-catastrophic sinkhole damage is $100,000---this would mean from the homeowner's perspective, the 50/50 cost effective odds of sinkhole insurance (if you can get it) would be 45 cents/year!!
Now, from an insurer's perspective, they can expect an average payout of $200,000/year in TV. Last Census data shows about 17,000 homes in TV, and if they charge $500/year for sinkhole insurance and everyone buys, they take in 8.5 million/year in premiums, so WHY IS THIS INSURANCE HARD TO GET?????? Better yet, maybe I'll go into the sinkhole insurance business, unless of course the cost of government regulation is 6 billion/year lol

I saw a firm pumping something into a hole in a yard between a house and Hillsborough Trail near the Dunedin pool this past week.

Actually, let me correct myself. A sinkhole insurer would only pay out $200,000/year if both proposed sinkholes caused non-catastrophic damage to both homes, which already is a 1:223,027 proposition. So they expected payout is 90 cents/insured home or $15,300/year for 17,000 homes. Not bad for 8.5 million in premium, but keep in mind I am not an actuary

I think there are about 50,000 homes in TV, now. Average lot size more like 4000 sf. And maybe the damage assessment is closer to $200,000. But in the final analysis, one would think that sinkhole liability would be very reasonable for an insurance company. I don't understand why it is so difficult to buy sinkhole insurance, either. I wonder why the residents, or the developer, haven't created a COOP to provide this insurance.

Raise some venture capital and I'm in :MOJE_whot:

Wait a minute. YOU raise some venture capital, and I'M in. Just kidding. Actually, I would be happy to join a co-op, but I am past looking for a money maker. I'm now in spending mode. I do wonder what we are not considering, though, since I assume the developer has already looked at this and determined that it isn't a money maker.

I would assume that not only the developer but all the insurance companies have already looked into it. There may be legislative and regulatory risks and costs that are hard to quantify. There may be public perception risks, such as "this should be included in my policy already, why do I have to pay more" or some such nonsense. The nature of sinkholes is somewhat random so there could be a risk of getting hit by far more than the expected number of claims. If that is the case, the regulatory risk would be a law passed that requires a huge amount of money being held in escrow to cover that unlikely scenario, much the same as the PBGC (Pension benefit guarantee ) requires huge reserves to cover adverse market conditions. Remember, insurance cos. don't gamble, they only offer a sure thing (for them). Then there would be the cost of more adjusters, more arguments of whether it is really a sinkhole or some microscopic depression in the ground, the inflated cost of repairs once the contractors know it is covered by insurance, etc.
All in all, I'm in the spending mode as well. On the other hand, MY idea, YOUR capital works fine for me LOL:thumbup:

Because the sinkhole insurance on a state level was being abused. People were turning in fraudulent claims.

This led to changes being made a couple of years ago. I will see if I can find the information and link it here.

There are many explanations of this. Type in words similar to these; sinkhole fraudulent claims insurance Florida, or law changed in 2009.

It is a statewide problem, although most sinkhole activity is in West-Central Florida, with the Tampa area having the most.

Here is one link;
New Florida law takes aim at sinkhole fraud - NetQuote