Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon
(Post 794961)
Speed, size, and weight versus size and weight. LSV belong on the road not on Golf cart paths.
|
Steve9930: I happen to agree with you. Personally I always felt it was unsafe and unfair to have LSV's use multi-modal pathways mainly because of safety issues (the 20mph restriction). some may say that there is no speed limit on the multi-modal path ways and that police have no authority, I agree but these are canards like many illuminating from Stonecrest.
First the 20mph rule, perhaps police can't ticket you for exceeding 20 mph on the multi-modal path ways but they do on the roads for having an unregistered vehicle. So they are in effect policing the speed of unregistered carts which exceeds 20mph. Label it any way you choose
The complaint from Stonecrest is that (x) number of residents do not have driver licenses and therefore need their carts. I would like to know how many actual Stonecrest residents were talking about and why they do not possess a driver licenses . I mean if the state of florida refuses to issue a driver's license to them there well good be a safety issue here. Perhaps like the guy from Oxford who had a difficulty seeing and used our cart paths running down a pedestrian.
I also see another Stonecrest canard ...are some residents feeling buyers remorse. is that what this is really all about?
This issue isn't about good or bad people its about choices and its about protection of our investment. Clearly we can't and shouldn't interfere with commerce, restaurants, town squares, etc but we paid highly for our amenities which included the multi-modal pathways.
I expect and demand the Developer keep his promise that I was buying into a Lifestyle because if a person can live outside the villages and still enjoy the "Lifestyle" then I have a whole lot of questions.
finally I don't want to hear that non residents can't use pools rec cents etc.
Frankly there are some villagers who never use a rec center, a pool etc but they still pay for the right to. IF someone is going down that road of a logical progression then I countering with perhaps we ought to make amenities divisible. I don't use rec centers pools, et so I don't want to pay for them................get my drift. Its all or nothing for us and so it has to be all or noting for outsiders. You want to use your cart to view the gardens from the multi-modal paths move to The Villages there still are a lot of homes for sale[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure how many people need access to the Hospital via Golf Carts. I myself use an automobile to get around if I have to cross 441/27. Its unfortunate that the article that started this fire storm again was so misleading. A sign of the time, sensational journalism to attract readers. The fact is there is a group of residents in Stonecrest that are trying to get a Golf Cart Crossing approved by the County and State so Golf Carts may cross 441/27 between the Hospital and the Doctors offices at the light. That is the total story. Now will some people use that crossing to get down to Spanish Springs, or Sumter landing, I'd be a liar if I said that would not happen but I'd also think it was pretty callus of people if they oppose that crossing just because a few carts will go on farther. The fact of the matter is if I wanted to take a ride around the villages by Golf cart today all I need to do is go and rent a cart at a very reasonable price. I personally would use the crossing on the day I would need to see the FAA Flight Surgeon when I get my biannual Flight Physical who is in the Sharon Morris Building. Saves some gas.
I've also been across the bridge via Golf cart. The bridge is an accident waiting to happen. Its is very dangerous from and engineering point of view. Even when I could get across there by Golf Cart, I'd prefer the car it was a much safer choice.