Sumter County's Proposed Review of Impact Fees and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-09-2021, 04:05 PM
Veracity Veracity is offline
Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 63
Thanks: 21
Thanked 83 Times in 37 Posts
Default Sumter County's Proposed Review of Impact Fees and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments

Does anyone know about the proposal for the Sumter County Commissioners to spend $46,495 of taxpayer money to hire a consultant to review the county’s impact fee program as well as the non-ad valorem assessment program? This is an agenda item on the Tuesday (5/11) Board of County Commissioners Meeting (public meeting).

It looks like the proposed study will consider fees for parks and recreation; fire rescue; medical first response and transport; law enforcement; correctional facilities; libraries; public buildings; public safety radio systems; and storm water. I hope this doesn’t mean another tax increase is on the horizon. See pages 9 – 12 at the following link for details:
https://www.sumtercountyfl.gov/Agend...8?fileID=43089
  #2  
Old 05-09-2021, 07:34 PM
Northwoods Northwoods is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 890
Thanks: 56
Thanked 1,212 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Hopefully someone who is familiar will have a comment.
I would be surprised if the newly-elected commissioners would approve an increase in payment for services. They ran on a “roll back the 25% tax increase.” I can’t believe they would want to try to play a “shell game” with taxpayers.
  #3  
Old 05-09-2021, 07:51 PM
Dond1959 Dond1959 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 245
Thanks: 3
Thanked 514 Times in 139 Posts
Default

Impact fees are paid by businesses that build. Of course the business customers ultimately pay these fees. It is just another move by these commissioners to increase fees (taxes) on businesses and make the area less business friendly.
  #4  
Old 05-09-2021, 08:11 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 4,885
Thanks: 1,309
Thanked 5,387 Times in 2,065 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northwoods View Post
Hopefully someone who is familiar will have a comment.
I would be surprised if the newly-elected commissioners would approve an increase in payment for services. They ran on a “roll back the 25% tax increase.” I can’t believe they would want to try to play a “shell game” with taxpayers.
I don't know what this is about. However, speculating:

- There is a poster on here who has been calling for a review of the Sumter County impact fees. Perhaps the Commissioners heard him.

- A review of the impact fees might be a first step required under the recently-passed bill to make the increase in road impact fees stick.

- If the study will involve more than just impact fees for roads then perhaps it is a way to recover some of the impact of new construction while staying within the bounds of the recently-passed bill
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #5  
Old 05-09-2021, 08:12 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 4,885
Thanks: 1,309
Thanked 5,387 Times in 2,065 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dond1959 View Post
Impact fees are paid by businesses that build. Of course the business customers ultimately pay these fees. It is just another move by these commissioners to increase fees (taxes) on businesses and make the area less business friendly.
That's a rather simplistic answer. Do you really suppose the Commissioners went into office thinking that above all what they needed to do was to make the area less business friendly?
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #6  
Old 05-09-2021, 08:17 PM
Mleeja's Avatar
Mleeja Mleeja is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Santiago
Posts: 1,826
Thanks: 9
Thanked 656 Times in 250 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
That's a rather simplistic answer. Do you really suppose the Commissioners went into office thinking that above all what they needed to do was to make the area less business friendly?
Yes, they went in to “stick it to the developer”.
__________________
The difference between genius and stupidity is genius has its limits - Albert Einstein
  #7  
Old 05-09-2021, 08:36 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 4,885
Thanks: 1,309
Thanked 5,387 Times in 2,065 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mleeja View Post
Yes, they went in to “stick it to the developer”.
I understand that is the way some want to see it, including some that support the Commissioners. I don't agree with that interpretation. The topic is more complex than that and quick and easy jabs such as "stick it to the developer" do nothing to help understanding.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #8  
Old 05-09-2021, 08:58 PM
Northwoods Northwoods is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 890
Thanks: 56
Thanked 1,212 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
I understand that is the way some want to see it, including some that support the Commissioners. I don't agree with that interpretation. The topic is more complex than that and quick and easy jabs such as "stick it to the developer" do nothing to help understanding.
I honestly wish that wasn’t true. Because I believe we will have a much better “infrastructure/county” if the commissioners would find a way to work with the developer. But some commissioners have stated that they want The Developer to pick up costs for a number of things. One was square entertainment. A portion of that cost is/was paid for by a hotel tax. One commissioner wanted the developer to pay for square entertainment... until there was such a backlash he changed his tune. But it doesn’t change the fact that his attitude was “have The Developer pay for it.”
  #9  
Old 05-09-2021, 09:04 PM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 12,373
Thanks: 6,344
Thanked 4,900 Times in 2,442 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veracity View Post
Does anyone know about the proposal for the Sumter County Commissioners to spend $46,495 of taxpayer money to hire a consultant to review the county’s impact fee program as well as the non-ad valorem assessment program? This is an agenda item on the Tuesday (5/11) Board of County Commissioners Meeting (public meeting).

It looks like the proposed study will consider fees for parks and recreation; fire rescue; medical first response and transport; law enforcement; correctional facilities; libraries; public buildings; public safety radio systems; and storm water. I hope this doesn’t mean another tax increase is on the horizon. See pages 9 – 12 at the following link for details:
https://www.sumtercountyfl.gov/Agend...8?fileID=43089

IMO taxes rarely it ever go down. Studies are done to reinforce budget proposal’s which usually mean “ mo money”
  #10  
Old 05-10-2021, 05:30 AM
Dond1959 Dond1959 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 245
Thanks: 3
Thanked 514 Times in 139 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
That's a rather simplistic answer. Do you really suppose the Commissioners went into office thinking that above all what they needed to do was to make the area less business friendly?
Yes, I believe from their actions thus far they are less business friendly and would like to slow or stop growth. And there are many residents in the Villages who think the Villages is too big now. So these commissioners are feeding that “make the developer and other businesses pay”. This is just an extension of the road impact fee increase to other impact fees on any business that expands. It is amazing that these alleged Republicans are spending all their time on determining how to increase taxes. And yet they haven’t explained how they plan to “roll back” the 25% increase on property taxes.
  #11  
Old 05-10-2021, 05:50 AM
crash crash is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 701
Thanks: 950
Thanked 493 Times in 240 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dond1959 View Post
Impact fees are paid by businesses that build. Of course the business customers ultimately pay these fees. It is just another move by these commissioners to increase fees (taxes) on businesses and make the area less business friendly.
You read too much Daily Sun impact fees are not taxes. It is a 1 time fee to cover the cost of new roads, fire stations and schools. If the new business does not pay it the tax payers will have to, thus the 25% increase in our taxes. The state just passed a law limiting local government from raising impact fees. This bill was started by a representive employed by the developer at $140,000 a year. Doesn’t seem like the way government is supposed to work to me.
  #12  
Old 05-10-2021, 05:52 AM
J1ceasar J1ceasar is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 843
Thanks: 49
Thanked 614 Times in 322 Posts
Default

If you ever watched the comedy show Yes prime Minister from England you would know that having a study is one way politicians cover their backsides. That being said actually getting a study done means that the politicians in charge are not experts in the taxes being proposed and the way they are raised as well as competition from other counties. I would applaud anyone who admits they aren't the smartest light bulb in the box. This is actually a good thing even though it's a lot of money I would think it's a lot of work getting all the statistics together to compare other counties and how they raise money. Remember these politicians basically said they were going to cut back the property tax rate and raise the infrastructure taxes to where they should be. At the same time it's only fair to figure out whether or not the citizens are getting their just desserts and are paying a fair share of total tax burden. There are many parts of government that have no way to raise revenue, like building departments do, or having the gas tax for the counting to help pay for road maintenance, certainly the hospitals, fire departments, building inspections, have a specific costs and they have to have revenue every year to cover themselves. I remember quite distinctly 10 years ago when we had a recession certain cities like Leesburg cut back their building inspection teams and permit from 50 people to 10 people. Sumter county literally raised 50 million last year in new taxes which I'm sure they figured how to spend right away. Nobody likes to see taxes rise unless it's truly necessary and as certain parties always say it's fair. I'll leave you to the side which party says Fair more often
  #13  
Old 05-10-2021, 07:15 AM
RuthA RuthA is offline
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 52
Thanks: 160
Thanked 42 Times in 17 Posts
Default

That is where you are wrong. The 25% increase in the real estate rate was necessitated by the Developer refusing to pay for the new roads down South of 44 and the then Commissioners voting to raise taxes on all the residents in Sumter County in order to benefit the Developer. The current Commissioners voted to raise the Impact Fees in order to force the Developer to pay for this development and thus be able to roll back this huge increase.
  #14  
Old 05-10-2021, 07:31 AM
Bogie Shooter Bogie Shooter is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18,866
Thanks: 10
Thanked 5,367 Times in 2,396 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RuthA View Post
That is where you are wrong. The 25% increase in the real estate rate was necessitated by the Developer refusing to pay for the new roads down South of 44 and the then Commissioners voting to raise taxes on all the residents in Sumter County in order to benefit the Developer. The current Commissioners voted to raise the Impact Fees in order to force the Developer to pay for this development and thus be able to roll back this huge increase.
I am waiting for my refund………..
__________________
The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell.
“Only truth and transparency can guarantee freedom”, John McCain
  #15  
Old 05-10-2021, 07:32 AM
merrymini merrymini is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 877
Thanks: 428
Thanked 1,201 Times in 463 Posts
Default

Very disappointed in these guys. Glad to have removed the puppets but I feel we have replaced them with fools. Looking to the next election.
Closed Thread

Tags
public, meeting, program, commissioners, county


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.