![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just curious. |
Quote:
|
Since the historic district does not have to fear the gnome police, there is no fear of you being called out. But let's be honest in every neighborhood there is that yard that looks like walmart garden shop vomited on it. We had that person two doors down. Nope did not address the problem with her, or make an officall complaint . We just moved, it was easier, than upsetting some of the neighborhood, since it would have been a hot topic.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
BTW, I do know an Omar. He is a rather large guy who does great drywall repair. I do not know if he makes muumuus on the side. |
A middle ground
It seems that there is no way to reach a happy median between the "everything goes" and the get rid of it all" residents. Perhaps there is a solution that will make both camps equally unhappy and therefore equitable. As the past chairman of the Nassau County Code Enforcement Board (Just north east of Jacksonville), I have a bit of experience in this type of "cat fight". When I took the chairmanship of the board residents where able to file complaints with out giving their name. In short we had our "97" type complainers.
When we forced the complainant to give their name the complaints dropped dramatically. The property owners that were cited were then given a period to correct the infraction or request to appear before the enforcement board. This board was made up of seven county residents and the county attorney. Both sides were given an opportunity to be heard and photos were shown of the alleged infraction. In short we could decide neighbor to neighbor where the 8" statue should be considered offensive or decorative and in good taste. Individuals that were cited were allowed to bring others to testify in their behalf, in short neighbors who had no objections to the alleged infraction. I realize that it would take a bit of work to set up a system such as this but considering the time spent here on this subject...... |
It seems that there is no way to reach a happy median between the "everything goes" and the get rid of it all" residents. Perhaps there is a solution that will make both camps equally unhappy and therefore equitable. As the past chairman of the Nassau County Code Enforcement Board (Just north east of Jacksonville), I have a bit of experience in this type of "cat fight". When I took the chairmanship of the board residents where able to file complaints with out giving their name. In short we had our "97" type complainers.
When we forced the complainant to give their name the complaints dropped dramatically. The property owners that were cited were then given a period to correct the infraction or request to appear before the enforcement board. This board was made up of seven county residents and the county attorney. Both sides were given an opportunity to be heard and photos were shown of the alleged infraction. In short we could decide neighbor to neighbor where the 8" statue should be considered offensive or decorative and in good taste. Individuals that were cited were allowed to bring others to testify in their behalf, in short neighbors who had no objections to the alleged infraction. I realize that it would take a bit of work to set up a system such as this but considering the time spent here on this subject...... |
Quote:
Maybe everyone should just go back and actually read their deed restrictions they have already agreed to and then go by what they say.....then there will be no disagreements. :jester: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Horrors. |
Front flag poles
Are the US Flags on poles in front an exception?? or just protected from the "condo nazis" by the second admendment?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.