Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#16
|
||
|
||
A more meaningful number to look in addition to full time emplyees would be
full time employees +
part time employees + ALL subcontracted employees/work expense = total cost of people doing work to maintain TV. The headcount GAME is just that...a number that by itself reveals....MEETING THE CURRENT DEFINITION OF HEADCOUNT. IN THIS CASE....FULL TIME EMPLOYEES. Just a single point of data not representative of the real "people" expenses actually incurred. btk |
|
#17
|
||
|
||
BTK - thank you.... this is what I pointed out in my original post on this subject.
I used to ask my students if a 5% growth rate year over year was good? Of course the right answer is that you don't have enough information to answer the question. 192 VCDD employees does not tell us that the government is fat, skinny or anywhere in between. Without a whole lot more info, it is just a meaningless statistic...
__________________
Holyoke, Mass; East Granby, Monroe, Madison and Branford, Conn; Port Clyde, Maine; North Myrtle Beach, SC; The Village of Bonita (April 2009 - ) |
#18
|
||
|
||
And don't forget the volunteers, which frequently are doing something that could create employment for others.
TH, your list really isn't fair -- How many people work for Community Watch? usually part-timers How many are there at the gates? all part-time How many in the sales office? assistants part-time/contractors; not sure what the agent/sales staff called -- might be independent since they have real estate license How many in the relocation office? no info on this one How many in the administrative office? about even mixture of full/part-time How many at the Charter School? not TV staff How many at the Fire Department? not TV staff, county How many in the legal office? most legal outsourced How many in the construction office? unknown How many work at the newspaper not TV staff How many work at the radio station? not TV staff How about the television station? not TV staff Are the transportation drivers not employees? part-timers The recreation department has many employees. majority part-timers Isn't there a property management department? supposedly not, but seems to have been phased in again, not sure of the # of employees or other info I've met some of the beautiful ladies who work in human resources? unkown The amenity authority surely has employees uunknown How about the architectural review committee (are they volunteer) believe they are volunteers, but won't swear to it Utilities, Budget, Finance, acquisition, district management, yet more. utilities not TV staff; unknown as to rest While we are comparing TV to a municipality, it isn't. We don't have our own police/fire/rescue departments -- they are manned by the appropriate counties. We don't have many of the departments a city our size would have, nor do we have any say in how these non-existent departments would be run. I doubt a city would be allowed to hire so many part-timers. People would be in an uproar that they weren't getting the benefits, etc. So, 192 full-time employees to run TV sounds pretty reasonable, albeit an absolutely worthless number. Without knowing how many positions are staffed by part-time employees or volunteers, we have no clue how well-run TV actually is. Also, we don't know how many entities that would be true departments in a municipality are actually subbed out here. However, looking at TV, looking at all that is offered here, looking at all there is, I'd say TV is doing a very good job and has a very well-oiled machine. And, since it has absolutely no relevance to us (we don't pay for it regardless unless amenity fees would go up because of more full-time employees), who in heck cares?
__________________
Army/embassy brat - traveled too much to mention Moved here from SF Bay Area (East Bay) "There are only two ways to live your life: One is as though nothing is a miracle; the other is as though everything is a miracle." Albert Einstein |
#19
|
||
|
||
One day we residents will have to know the "real expense" of manpower,
(any label you wanna put on it).....let's around build out time when there will have to be a transition of responsibility from the developer to the residents.
There have been many development transitions that have gotten unpleasant when the real costs of operations were exposed.....minus the subsidizing of the developer to make sure everything stays in place during their "marketing tenure". Most do a good job of providing sufficient funding to bridge the transition as well as a few years into operating by the residents. Hopefully that will be the case here in TV. btk |
#20
|
||
|
||
Quote:
|
#21
|
||
|
||
The "192" number, while impressive, is very misleading. That is more like 192 supervisors and managers to oversee all the volunteers, part-timers, and contracted-out services and no real workers (well - maybe a few real workers like in public safety). The meaningful number would be how many workers it takes to provide all TV services and support - contractors, volunteers, part-timers, and full-timers. I suspect that number would make us look quite inefficient (based on numbers only) because, frankly, others wouldn't have the rec center employees to the extent we do, golf course employees, community watch personnel, on and on and on. Apples to apples comparisons probably are not possible when considering TV - we do things so much differently with so many fun-oriented or "optional" expenses (i.e. flowers in every traffic circle). Budget-wise, per capita, I'll bet TV spends as much or probably more than most cities to service and support their residents but no one provides those kinds of numbers, do they? This may sound negative but it is not. I am very happy with TV and the way it runs - not perfect but if you find something better, leave TV and go there. I don't see any mass exodus coming up. The old saying "Figures don't lie but liars can figure" probably applies in this situation.
|
#22
|
||
|
||
Quote:
|
#23
|
||
|
||
Not so sure that this is correct. The Villages Public Safety Dept had 67 full time employees as of the end of 2010. The chief of the dept reports to Janet Tutt and on the Sumter County yearly tax bills there is a fee for "Villages Fire District", which as I understood it that goes to The Villages Fire Dept operating expenses. |
#24
|
||
|
||
192 employees.
That sounds good. If we are comparing TV with municipalities, should we not also have to count county employees who supply services, and who are paid from our tax base, as opposed to ameneties fees ?
I agree with all previous posters who think that this type of number is utterly useless unless situated in some type of context. |
#25
|
||
|
||
No cause for worry at this point wether the number is 192 or 192000. If TV is over staffed we could call a certain governor who could reduce the number rather quickly.
|
Closed Thread |
|
|