Villages - general question

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 08-07-2019, 04:44 PM
Marathon Man Marathon Man is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,462
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2,655 Times in 938 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid View Post
And there is no age guideline/rule/ratio for resales.
Also not true. Lots of people believe that, but there is a process that takes place. I know this because I just recently looked into how TV insures that we do not go below 80%.
  #17  
Old 08-07-2019, 04:45 PM
Barefoot's Avatar
Barefoot Barefoot is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winters in TV, Summers in Canada.
Posts: 17,669
Thanks: 1,694
Thanked 243 Times in 184 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marathon Man View Post
No. A 19 yo can purchase and live full time in the house alone. As long as the community has above 80% 55+ occupancy. There are many couples in there early 50s living here.
__________________
Barefoot At Last
No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Saving one dog will not change the world, but surely for that one dog, the world will change forever.
  #18  
Old 08-07-2019, 04:46 PM
eweissenbach's Avatar
eweissenbach eweissenbach is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Smithville (Kansas City) Mo./ LaBelle North
Posts: 4,566
Thanks: 112
Thanked 726 Times in 225 Posts
Send a message via AIM to eweissenbach
Default

At least 80% of the homes must be occupied by at least one person 55 or older in order to qualify as an "age restricted community". I am not sure how that is monitored, but I would be willing to bet my 401K that we are not even close to 20% being occupied by under 55 couples or families. Yes there are a few and I have met a couple but there are over 50,000 homes in TV and there are NOT 10,000 that have no one over 55.
__________________
Oldcoach Ed
"You cannot direct the wind, but you can adjust the sails" "Be yourself - everyone else is taken"
  #19  
Old 08-07-2019, 04:48 PM
Marathon Man Marathon Man is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,462
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2,655 Times in 938 Posts
Default

Those that wish to do some reading, search for information on the Housing for Older Persons Act (HOPA). You can see for yourself that many if the things that you have heard are not accurate.
  #20  
Old 08-07-2019, 05:16 PM
biker1 biker1 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,126
Thanks: 1
Thanked 932 Times in 524 Posts
Default

There are actually just shy of 62,000 homes in The Villages. While I am not positive, I believe they can monitor ages via The Villages ID cards. I also know several couples under 55 and I agree that it is very unlikely that we are anywhere close to 20% under 55.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eweissenbach View Post
At least 80% of the homes must be occupied by at least one person 55 or older in order to qualify as an "age restricted community". I am not sure how that is monitored, but I would be willing to bet my 401K that we are not even close to 20% being occupied by under 55 couples or families. Yes there are a few and I have met a couple but there are over 50,000 homes in TV and there are NOT 10,000 that have no one over 55.
  #21  
Old 08-07-2019, 05:21 PM
Barefoot's Avatar
Barefoot Barefoot is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winters in TV, Summers in Canada.
Posts: 17,669
Thanks: 1,694
Thanked 243 Times in 184 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid View Post
And there is no age guideline/rule/ratio for resales.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marathon Man View Post
Also not true. Lots of people believe that, but there is a process that takes place. I know this because I just recently looked into how TV insures that we do not go below 80%.
Although I agree with eweissenbach and I'm sure it's fine, I'm curious how TV monitors the 80% rule on new houses and resales.
__________________
Barefoot At Last
No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Saving one dog will not change the world, but surely for that one dog, the world will change forever.
  #22  
Old 08-07-2019, 05:25 PM
alwann's Avatar
alwann alwann is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Village of Gilchrist
Posts: 841
Thanks: 3
Thanked 752 Times in 220 Posts
Default 55 over and under

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marathon Man View Post
Also not true. Lots of people believe that, but there is a process that takes place. I know this because I just recently looked into how TV insures that we do not go below 80%.
Please tell me what you learned. Also tell me if you believe TV powers care. I recall a posting where a resident said the developer stated the company couldn't do anything about loser kids living here; no authority over what goes on inside a home. And what goes on outside a home is the district's problem.

So, tell me, who's regulating this 80/20 rule?
  #23  
Old 08-07-2019, 05:57 PM
OrangeBlossomBaby OrangeBlossomBaby is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,485
Thanks: 6,842
Thanked 9,426 Times in 3,080 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazuela View Post
But if you are 19, you can PURCHASE a home in the Villages. Buying a home doesn't mean living in one, or occupying one.

You don't have to be 55 or older to PURCHASE any home in the Villages at all. You only have to be 19 or older. You can be 19 years old, buy 4 Designer homes in the Villages, and rent every single one of them out to 55+ couples if you want. You just can't live in it permanently if you are not living with at least one resident who is 55 or older (notwithstanding the 80/20 rule).

If a 55-year-old lives in the house, then their 19-year-old child is allowed to live there too. That 19-year-old is not allowed to use the adult pools, because there is a 30+ age restriction on those pools. But yes, they may live there. That 19-year-old is not allowed to live there by himself, unless that 80/20 exemption is applied.

The law says that at least one person residing in 80% of the homes must be 55 or older. It does not forbid 19 year olds from living there too.

The deed restrictions prevent 19-year-olds from being the sole occupant of the home, and they prevent families, none of whom are at least 55 years old, from residing in the home (except in the areas designated for families, notwithstanding the 80/20 law, which is a law, not a policy).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marathon Man View Post
No. A 19yo can purchase and live full time in the house alone. As long as the community has above 80% 55+ occupancy. There are many couples in there early 50s living here.

Again. So much misunderstanding about this subject.
The misunderstanding is on your part, since you're the one who is agreeing with everything I said, while at the same time saying "no."
  #24  
Old 08-07-2019, 06:13 PM
njbchbum's Avatar
njbchbum njbchbum is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Summer at the Jersey Shore, Fall in New England [Maine], Winter in TV!
Posts: 5,633
Thanks: 3,060
Thanked 753 Times in 256 Posts
Default

For anyone who wishes to know the FACTS re 55+ Communities rules, regs, statutes, law, and much more - here's the site for you"
Housing-55 & Older Communities — Florida Commission on Human Relations

The brief summary is:
Housing for Older Persons Requirements

Federal Register 24 CFR Part 100; section 760.24-760.37 (4a), Florida Statutes

For a community to be considered "housing for older persons" as a 55+ community, the housing must be intended and operated for occupancy by persons 55 years of age or older and meet the following requirements:

At least 80% of the occupied units are occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older.

The facility or community publishes and adheres to policies and procedures that demonstrate its intent to in fact be a provider of housing for older persons.

The facility or community complies with rules established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for verification of occupancy.

And my bet is that the Admin Office of TV knows the birthday and date of anyone who has applied for their Villagers ID!
__________________
Not sure if I have free time...or if I just forgot everything I was supposed to do!

  #25  
Old 08-07-2019, 07:01 PM
manaboutown manaboutown is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NJ, NM, SC, PA, DC, MD, VA, NY, CA, ID and finally FL.
Posts: 7,397
Thanks: 12,902
Thanked 4,592 Times in 1,758 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by njbchbum View Post
For anyone who wishes to know the FACTS re 55+ Communities rules, regs, statutes, law, and much more - here's the site for you"
Housing-55 & Older Communities — Florida Commission on Human Relations

The brief summary is:
Housing for Older Persons Requirements

Federal Register 24 CFR Part 100; section 760.24-760.37 (4a), Florida Statutes

For a community to be considered "housing for older persons" as a 55+ community, the housing must be intended and operated for occupancy by persons 55 years of age or older and meet the following requirements:

At least 80% of the occupied units are occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older.

The facility or community publishes and adheres to policies and procedures that demonstrate its intent to in fact be a provider of housing for older persons.

The facility or community complies with rules established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for verification of occupancy.

And my bet is that the Admin Office of TV knows the birthday and date of anyone who has applied for their Villagers ID!
Bingo!

Essentially if a community complies with these guidelines and remains in compliance it is allowed to practice age discrimination otherwise countrary to federal laws prohibiting housing discrimination of any kind.

It is a piece of cake for TV to monitor its compliance through it's amenities ID system.
__________________
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth." Plato

“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.” Thomas Paine

Last edited by manaboutown; 08-07-2019 at 07:08 PM.
  #26  
Old 08-07-2019, 07:38 PM
Marathon Man Marathon Man is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,462
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2,655 Times in 938 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alwann View Post
Please tell me what you learned. Also tell me if you believe TV powers care. I recall a posting where a resident said the developer stated the company couldn't do anything about loser kids living here; no authority over what goes on inside a home. And what goes on outside a home is the district's problem.

So, tell me, who's regulating this 80/20 rule?
Not sure why you want to talk about "loser kids". They "can't do anything about it" because they are living here legally.

Yes, of course they care. If the community goes below 80%, we lose our 55+ designation and can never get it back. It is monitored, and currently we are about 93%. All sales are reviewed by 'The Developer', including resales.
  #27  
Old 08-08-2019, 06:23 AM
alwann's Avatar
alwann alwann is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Village of Gilchrist
Posts: 841
Thanks: 3
Thanked 752 Times in 220 Posts
Default

I don't want to talk about "loser kids." I was quoting another poster. Furthermore, are you saying even re-sales are reviewed by the developer? Really?
  #28  
Old 08-08-2019, 07:56 AM
perrjojo's Avatar
perrjojo perrjojo is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mission Hills
Posts: 2,294
Thanks: 226
Thanked 321 Times in 78 Posts
Default

Wow! So many experts..all with conflicting information.
  #29  
Old 08-08-2019, 08:13 AM
Carla B Carla B is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,769
Thanks: 52
Thanked 698 Times in 374 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefoot View Post
Although I agree with eweissenbach and I'm sure it's fine, I'm curious how TV monitors the 80% rule on new houses and resales.
All who live here supposedly have resident or guest I.D.s, right? I think you have to provide a birth date info to obtain an I.D. So District.gov should know who lives here and how old they are (provided they have a way to correct their data when someone passes on).
  #30  
Old 08-08-2019, 10:31 AM
Marathon Man Marathon Man is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,462
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2,655 Times in 938 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alwann View Post
I don't want to talk about "loser kids." I was quoting another poster. Furthermore, are you saying even re-sales are reviewed by the developer? Really?
Yes, I was told that all sales, including re-sales of exiting properties, are reviewed.

I asked about this because I know that lots of 55+ communities (for example high rise condo buildings) control to 100% 55+. They have a process for approving all sales. So, there must be a process here to ensure that we do not fall below 80%.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 AM.