frayedends |
02-25-2024 09:15 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredguy123
(Post 2305015)
I view the commission a little differently than some people. As a seller, I agree to pay a commission to the listing broker to represent me and to buy their sales expertise and negotiation skills to sell the house for a good price. I expect them to earn the commission, or I wouldn't be agreeing to pay it. I am not and would not pay a commission to an agent who is representing a buyer because that is a conflict of interest. It also sounds like a violation of Florida law about the "dual agent" prohibition stated in Post No. 30. If a buyer wants someone to represent their interests, they should pay an agent or lawyer for that representation. Why should I pay for it? When signing a listing contract, I would make it very clear to the listing broker, that none of the commission that I pay at the closing can be used to pay an agent who has a contract with the buyer or, in any way, represents the buyer in the negotiations. It almost sounds like the real estate industry is trying to treat the sales commission as an automatic add-on fee to be shared by the licensed agents involved in the transaction.
|
The only problem is that you may limit the number of showings you get. If I'm an agent representing a buyer, would I want to show him your property, knowing I wouldn't get paid. Now, what would/should generally happen if you have a listing and I am a buyer's agent (I'm not an agent at all, this is hypothetical) is this. I say to my buyer, "Here is a house listed that you may be interested in. They are not paying a buyer's agent, so if you want me to represent you, you will have to pay me out of pocket $$XX. Otherwise you are welcome to contact the listing agent and see the home on your own without my representation."
The problem here is the listing agent can't be a dual agent. A dual agent means representing the buyer and seller. That is a conflict of interest. So the buyer is being unrepresented. If they are knowledgable that may not be an issue. Will they be saving any money? IDK. In your example, if you are the seller, is your agent taking half their usual commission because they don't have to pay a buyer's agent? If they agree to lower commission, are you accepting a lower price on the house, thereby passing the savings on to the buyer?
|