[golf47guy]

Time to look at other 55 and older communities!!!

[Indydealmaker]

Originally Posted by Buckeye Bob

I don't understand how the developer has the right to keep the amenity fees. The developer does not own the amenities; the districts own them. This is a slap in the face to every Villager paying amenity fees. ������������

The Developer has a contract providing him the amenity fees in exchange for signing over certain properties to The Villages.

[Indydealmaker]

Originally Posted by bob47

Maybe somebody who always apologizes for the developer can explain how it's fair that we all pay $150+ per month to use all the amenities, and the residents of this development will be contributing $14 per month to use all the amenities.

Don Deakin is the only AAC member who thinks things through and is a true fiduciary for the folks he represents.

Each apartment WILL be paying amenities fees just like yours. The developer is reimbursing $14 to The Villages for certain services, not amenities.

[Topspinmo]

Originally Posted by iht2209

We need to hold the representative in the districts accountable to the residents..... a good way to send the message is to un-elect the 3 commissioners

Wasting you’re time with 4 of the yes men and woman

[Topspinmo]

Originally Posted by Indydealmaker

Each apartment WILL be paying amenities fees just like yours. The developer is reimbursing $14 to The Villages for certain services, not amenities.

They will be paying amenities fees to the developers not the district.

[Topspinmo]

Originally Posted by golf47guy

Time to look at other 55 and older communities!!!

I wonder where apartment complex will go around sumpter landing? Lets where is the nearest championship golf course?

[Indydealmaker]

Originally Posted by Topspinmo

They will be paying amenities fees to the developers not the district.

The District is not contractually entitled to receive any of the amenities fees. What is your point?

If they are 55+ , not too high and condos I think they might be an asset to the community as many in the North are getting older. It’s worrisome for those on championship courses if they don’t carry their freight.

[nn0wheremann]

Originally Posted by tophcfa

There is no protection (for existing homeowners) to be had from the current Sumter County Commissioners, they are the developers puppets. We can only hope the Amenity Authority Committee votes to reject granting amenity privileges to the proposed high density rental apartment complex. Without amenity privileges the economics of the apartment complex might change enough to take that plan off the table. Fingers crossed for this mornings vote to protect the existing single family homeowners living in the area!

And, what about the additional traffic on Morse Blvd from high density housing? In high season it already is quite the challenge to traverse the Morse- ElCamino-Paige roundabout. I imagine the snarl at the Morse-466 gate, and the cart path crossing just above there will be a suicide run

[NoMoSno]

Originally Posted by nn0wheremann

And, what about the additional traffic on Morse Blvd from high density housing? In high season it already is quite the challenge to traverse the Morse- ElCamino-Paige roundabout. I imagine the snarl at the Morse-466 gate, and the cart path crossing just above there will be a suicide run

Also golf carts trying to go around that roundabout will be a dangerous challenge.