What is the definition of a Covid 19 Case?

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-02-2021, 01:19 PM
DALEPQ DALEPQ is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 149
Thanks: 0
Thanked 275 Times in 62 Posts
Default What is the definition of a Covid 19 Case?

Everything we now hear is based on Covid 19 "Case Counts".
Yet, I can't seem to find exactly what the Factual definition of a Covid case is.
I believe it means a positive test result, but then what does that mean?
Is it that you are currently testing positive, or that you were previously positive?
(For the record we got Vax'd. as soon a we possibly could get it, in later Jan.
To this point no known side effects, nor contracting Covid.) Thus, not anti Vax.
Just can't seem to get "The Rest of The Story". Yet, it is an hourly headline!
p.s. DHS has disclosed that over 1Mil. have come across the So. border so far this
year, with a totally unknown number of "Got Aways". They won't disclose how
many of those Illegals are positive Covid cases, nor were they are being sent
all over the country. So what factor are they contributing to the Covid spread?
Not being cynical, but not getting told factual information either.
  #2  
Old 08-02-2021, 01:51 PM
Bogie Shooter Bogie Shooter is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18,858
Thanks: 10
Thanked 5,359 Times in 2,393 Posts
Default

This should be interesting………..
__________________
The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell.
“Only truth and transparency can guarantee freedom”, John McCain
  #3  
Old 08-02-2021, 02:03 PM
GoPacers GoPacers is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 205
Thanks: 13
Thanked 404 Times in 107 Posts
Default

There are confirmed and probable cases. Confirmed are as described - confirmed by a positive COVID test. Could be a PCR test or other and you can debate the merits of the different test all you want but they are confirmed cases. Probable cases are just that, someone made a determination that a case was most likely to be COVID. Just as with the confirmed cases, you can debate the merits of the observation as much as one wants.

If someone said the actual cases were off by 10% I personally wouldn't argue since nobody really knows. That number would still be directionally correct. If someone said the actual cases were off by 50% I'd not discuss the topic with that person any longer as they were coming at this with a different objective than many. With regards to someone testing positive more than once - again, probably not significant in the macro view.

Not sure what relevance the immigration numbers have on this. The data clearly shows (of late) that the overwhelming majority of cases are from folks who have not been vaccinated. If you could prove that the immigrants that were crossing the border were subsequently traveling to areas where the majority of the residents were not vaccinated then you could probably make a credible argument the surge was a result of immigration crossings or at least contributed to by those crossings. Makes for great news headlines but the correlation/causation argument has never been made because it would be incredibly hard to make.

The border crisis is not a COVID crisis but the media hasn't relied on demonstrable facts for years and clearly they have no intention of starting now.
  #4  
Old 08-02-2021, 02:21 PM
Two Bills Two Bills is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 5,679
Thanks: 1,682
Thanked 7,358 Times in 2,509 Posts
Default

The 'Border Crisis' is convenient at the moment.
Someone/something will be more convenient tomorrow.
In the UK when we are facing a major crisis, we always blame the French.
It works for us!
  #5  
Old 08-02-2021, 05:41 PM
Dana1963 Dana1963 is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,295
Thanks: 3,174
Thanked 1,445 Times in 580 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DALEPQ View Post
Everything we now hear is based on Covid 19 "Case Counts".
Yet, I can't seem to find exactly what the Factual definition of a Covid case is.
I believe it means a positive test result, but then what does that mean?
Is it that you are currently testing positive, or that you were previously positive?
(For the record we got Vax'd. as soon a we possibly could get it, in later Jan.
To this point no known side effects, nor contracting Covid.) Thus, not anti Vax.
Just can't seem to get "The Rest of The Story". Yet, it is an hourly headline!
p.s. DHS has disclosed that over 1Mil. have come across the So. border so far this
year, with a totally unknown number of "Got Aways". They won't disclose how
many of those Illegals are positive Covid cases, nor were they are being sent
all over the country. So what factor are they contributing to the Covid spread?
Not being cynical, but not getting told factual information either.
If your sick enough to think you need a Covid Test then test positive you are your infected it’s quite simple.
I seriously doubt every single person crossing the border is infected some but not all.
I’m more concerned with the anti vaccine movement even Franklin Graham is loosing his flock. Many Evangelical scammers are telling there flock not to take the vaccine and not to wear masks.
  #6  
Old 08-02-2021, 06:01 PM
golfing eagles golfing eagles is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: The Villages
Posts: 12,225
Thanks: 820
Thanked 12,911 Times in 4,141 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dana1963 View Post
If your sick enough to think you need a Covid Test then test positive you are your infected it’s quite simple.
I seriously doubt every single person crossing the border is infected some but not all.
I’m more concerned with the anti vaccine movement even Franklin Graham is loosing his flock. Many Evangelical scammers are telling there flock not to take the vaccine and not to wear masks.
I'm not 100% sure, but I'm pretty sure they are just counting positive tests as "cases", don't need to be "sick". If we did that with seasonal flu, we'd probably have over 100 million "cases" every year. Of course, that won't happen since we don't test asymptomatic people for flu. Nor do we test them for any other disease except HIV, and in rare cases Tb. It's just COVID that has that honor, so no wonder we have so many "cases". And I can't think of any other disease that we test for in people AFTER they are vaccinated.
  #7  
Old 08-02-2021, 06:38 PM
Altavia Altavia is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 3,355
Thanks: 1,431
Thanked 2,743 Times in 1,225 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles View Post
And I can't think of any other disease that we test for in people AFTER they are vaccinated.
How about if you get an upper respiratory infection and in an abundance of caution, want to be sure it's not COVID?
  #8  
Old 08-02-2021, 06:39 PM
Altavia Altavia is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 3,355
Thanks: 1,431
Thanked 2,743 Times in 1,225 Posts
Default

Are we back at The initial goal to avoid overwhelming hospitals and needing to delay elective surgery?
  #9  
Old 08-02-2021, 06:59 PM
blueash's Avatar
blueash blueash is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,216
Thanks: 238
Thanked 3,162 Times in 833 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles View Post
Of course, that won't happen since we don't test asymptomatic people for flu. Nor do we test them for any other disease except HIV, and in rare cases Tb. It's just COVID that has that honor, so no wonder we have so many "cases". And I can't think of any other disease that we test for in people AFTER they are vaccinated.
When there is a pertussis outbreak we would routinely test those with a significant cough and some with exposure to the ill child. All of these people were vaccinated. All of them. But they were tested because pertussis is a serious disease for infants. And the doctors needed to know who in the environment was carrying pertussis or mildly ill with it and might be spreading it to other at risk infants. Those who were positive were isolated until completing treatment which unlike Covid is available.

No one complained this was an attack on their freedom or civil liberty. Everyone understood that the health of the community was more important than a temporary inconvenience to the individual. Dead babies do tend to engender more sympathy than dead adults, so there was that factor.
__________________
Men plug the dikes of their most needed beliefs with whatever mud they can find. - Clifford Geertz
  #10  
Old 08-02-2021, 07:11 PM
golfing eagles golfing eagles is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: The Villages
Posts: 12,225
Thanks: 820
Thanked 12,911 Times in 4,141 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie0723 View Post
How about if you get an upper respiratory infection and in an abundance of caution, want to be sure it's not COVID?
Only if I were sick enough to warrant hospitalization, otherwise you wouldn't treat it any differently
  #11  
Old 08-02-2021, 07:12 PM
golfing eagles golfing eagles is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: The Villages
Posts: 12,225
Thanks: 820
Thanked 12,911 Times in 4,141 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueash View Post
When there is a pertussis outbreak we would routinely test those with a significant cough and some with exposure to the ill child. All of these people were vaccinated. All of them. But they were tested because pertussis is a serious disease for infants. And the doctors needed to know who in the environment was carrying pertussis or mildly ill with it and might be spreading it to other at risk infants. Those who were positive were isolated until completing treatment which unlike Covid is available.

No one complained this was an attack on their freedom or civil liberty. Everyone understood that the health of the community was more important than a temporary inconvenience to the individual. Dead babies do tend to engender more sympathy than dead adults, so there was that factor.
Good one--didn't think of pertussis. And it's a good example of immunity waning at some point after vaccination
  #12  
Old 08-03-2021, 05:22 AM
Girlcopper Girlcopper is offline
Gold member
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 36
Thanked 1,558 Times in 597 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DALEPQ View Post
Everything we now hear is based on Covid 19 "Case Counts".
Yet, I can't seem to find exactly what the Factual definition of a Covid case is.
I believe it means a positive test result, but then what does that mean?
Is it that you are currently testing positive, or that you were previously positive?
(For the record we got Vax'd. as soon a we possibly could get it, in later Jan.
To this point no known side effects, nor contracting Covid.) Thus, not anti Vax.
Just can't seem to get "The Rest of The Story". Yet, it is an hourly headline!
p.s. DHS has disclosed that over 1Mil. have come across the So. border so far this
year, with a totally unknown number of "Got Aways". They won't disclose how
many of those Illegals are positive Covid cases, nor were they are being sent
all over the country. So what factor are they contributing to the Covid spread?
Not being cynical, but not getting told factual information either.
Oh boy. Here we go again!!
  #13  
Old 08-03-2021, 05:38 AM
camaguey48's Avatar
camaguey48 camaguey48 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 407
Thanks: 3
Thanked 927 Times in 250 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Girlcopper View Post
Oh boy. Here we go again!!
Of course. This will continue until ........forever?
__________________
“When you realize that to produce, you must obtain the permission from those who do not produce anything; When it is proven that the money flows to those who trade not with goods, but with favors; When you realize that many get rich by bribery and influence rather than by work. When you realize that corruption is rewarded and honesty becomes self-sacrifice; Then you can say, without fear of making mistakes, your society is doomed.”


Ayn Rand
Atlas Shrugged,1957.
  #14  
Old 08-03-2021, 05:41 AM
Cheapbas Cheapbas is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 202
Thanks: 10
Thanked 241 Times in 99 Posts
Default

Just go to YouTube and look for some people in lab coats, you’ll find the answer you want to hear
  #15  
Old 08-03-2021, 05:46 AM
doccraig doccraig is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post
Default

Let me get this straight. If someone doesn’t agree with the numbers you feel are accurate, then your advice is to not discuss the issue any further? Where is the scientific rigor and intellectual honesty in this path?
Closed Thread

Tags
covid, positive, case, factual, definition


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.