[retiredguy123]

Originally Posted by billethkid

The rule is whether one works in or for TV.....not where they live.

I know that enrollment is based on where the parents work. But, the schools were set up to support The Villages and they are using taxpayer money to educate the students. So, I just think they should be required to assist in enforcing the requirement that children under 19 not live in The Villages.

[graciegirl]

Originally Posted by retiredguy123

I know that enrollment is based on where the parents work. But, the schools were set up to support The Villages and they are using taxpayer money to educate the students. So, I just think they should be required to assist in enforcing the requirement that children under 19 not live in The Villages.

"THEY" always have done just that.

[Bucco]

Originally Posted by retiredguy123

I know that enrollment is based on where the parents work. But, the schools were set up to support The Villages and they are using taxpayer money to educate the students. So, I just think they should be required to assist in enforcing the requirement that children under 19 not live in The Villages.

The charter school system in The Villages was set up to attract better quality workers and professionals to be employed here.p and/or open business here.

[New Englander]

Originally Posted by TVMayor

Should Lake County Children’s Services be involved? 352-742-6520

Dad may be forbidden to enter his house but he could turn off the electricity and water.

I'd be okay to turn those off on the daughter, but not the child.

[Carla B]

Originally Posted by Topspinmo

News flash, the child is going to charter school with address in the villages 55 and over restricted age limit. So, they ARE not strictly enforced.

How do you know the child is going to the Charter school? Maybe he's attending The Villages Elementary of Lady Lake on Rolling Acres, which is not the Charter school.

[Barefoot]

Originally Posted by Carla B

How do you know the child is going to the Charter school? Maybe he's attending The Villages Elementary of Lady Lake on Rolling Acres, which is not the Charter school.

The article in the online newspaper stated that the child attends the Charter School.
Skip said the mother works in The Villages, so the child is therefore entitled to attend the Charter School.
The issue is a young child living in The Villages, not which school he attends.

[Madelaine Amee]

The unmentionable online news has more information this morning on this ongoing problem.

[graciegirl]

Originally Posted by Madelaine Amee

The unmentionable online news has more information this morning on this ongoing problem.

I didn't see any reference to this story M. A.

[New Englander]

Originally Posted by graciegirl

I didn't see any reference to this story M. A.

Same here

[Chi-Town]

The bottom line is if there is no resolution the father will have to sell his house, and that would end the controversy. Sad for him. And the poor kid is just a pawn in all of this.


Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

[manaboutown]

Originally Posted by Chi-Town

The bottom line is if there is no resolution the father will have to sell his house, and that would end the controversy. Sad for him. And the poor kid is just a pawn in all of this.


Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

The child is a pawn. His mother has used him from the get go as leverage to feed and house herself. This is all too common with adult druggies who otherwise would have to fend for themselves. They just have one or more children so that grandpa and/or grandma will continue to support them along with their grandchildren.

[Topspinmo]

Originally Posted by skip0358

News Flash. The school does’t enforce the where you live rule only that you work in TV. The other part is up to the District. Unless someone complains about a Child living where they don’t belong along with all the othe violations that occur it doesn’t get fixed. Even when violations are reported sometimes it’s a long process to get it fixed

I've bet she hasn't been employed by villages for years, probably IMO got fired long time ago. After all, what did she do with the money she made in 8 years? I think we can probably come to conclusion of that? Surely didn't go on saving for apartment? That child not the only one living in villages under 19 and probably not the only one going to charter school when thousands are involved. Yes they try to do things right but some entitled fall through the cracks. Nobody probably verified where they live at that address, it a paper trail and paper trails can be manipulated. I still say there's hardship clause that allows children under 19, though I can't find it? Plus there district that don't have to play my majority of rules in the common villages.

[Barefoot]

Originally Posted by Madelaine Amee

The unmentionable online news has more information this morning on this ongoing problem.

Which section? I couldn't find it.

[graciegirl]

Originally Posted by Topspinmo

I've bet she hasn't been employed by villages for years, probably IMO got fired long time ago. After all, what did she do with the money she made in 8 years? I think we can probably come to conclusion of that? Surely didn't go on saving for apartment? That child not the only one living in villages under 19 and probably not the only one going to charter school when thousands are involved. Yes they try to do things right but some entitled fall through the cracks. Nobody probably verified where they live at that address, it a paper trail and paper trails can be manipulated. I still say there's hardship clause that allows children under 19, though I can't find it? Plus there district that don't have to play my majority of rules in the common villages.

I looked for the mom on Facebook and I think I found her with her eight year old son. She appears to be involved in her local church here and looks like a typical nice person. There must be something we don't know.

[Barefoot]

Originally Posted by Topspinmo

..... what did she do with the money she made in 8 years? I think we can probably come to conclusion of that? Surely didn't go on saving for apartment?

You would think that she would have been saving for an apartment.
Now that she has gained possession of the home, she is protesting the lack of her dad's vehicle.