CoachKandSportsguy |
01-13-2022 03:32 PM |
just stop arguing by posting links of articles here versus articles there and trying to prove your link is better than the other link . .. . . the data is too summarized to infer medical actionable meaningful analysis. . . and if you wish the data would be more clear, welcome to the world of medical information and other large data systems, which are populated by humans who have many different interpretations and patients that don't understand the why to answer these seemingly mundane questions. and have fat fingers in some cases
and if you did get better information, what are you going to do with it? did you know that some ethnicity data entry options are free form? meaning martian is accepted. . . did you know that all nepalese have the same birthday? Jan 1 . . these are samples of data quality issues. . testing positivity, if you go to a doctor's office and ask for a PCR test, and they qualify you with a checklist, then expect a high positivity percentage. if everybody who has to pass a test first to get tested a second time to validate the first test, wouldn't you think the pass percentage to be high? yeah, that's the normal testing procedure which is why golfing eagles responds with more people getting tested means more positives, because more people pass the screening test.
Are you going to a party or a posting site to validate your authority about knowing better data quality? oh, wait, well . . .
public data versus medical professional data is very far apart, and in some states, the state DPH doesn't even want people to know so they don't submit. .
so find articles interesting, but remember they not a definitive answers unless you read peer reviewed articles and find the data set so looking at other covid information, the wastewater measurements in boston are showing the trail of a very infectious flu and very fast moving flu
MWRA - Wastewater COVID-19 Tracking
|