Why is it?

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-22-2009, 05:49 AM
Talk Host's Avatar
Talk Host Talk Host is offline
Founder
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,346
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 4 Posts
Default Why is it?

Why is that when a private developer like The Villages builds and operates a community, it seems to thrive. Yet cities, run by elected officials, are in desperate financial straits all across the country.

Here, we have golf courses, pools, recreation centers, good roads, hundreds, if not thousands of houses being built, a fire department with good equipment and many other desirable amenities.

In almost every other community, they are laying off police and fire, raising taxes, cutting services and generally shutting down.

I guess the short answer is that cities run on tax money and The Villages runs on profit from building houses. I'm sure the answer is deeper than that but can cities learn something from The Villages?
  #2  
Old 07-22-2009, 06:41 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,140
Thanks: 4,997
Thanked 5,734 Times in 1,981 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default Good question....

The answer may be upsetting because we all believe in democracy and I have laughed when Village07 sometimes refers to The Villages as a "benevolent dictatorship", but it is kinda true and it works. Not every one of the elected officials or great plans we have voted for is as good as the Morse family who profits for taking such good care of us, but is making the right decisions apparently.

Long live the king!
  #3  
Old 07-22-2009, 07:00 AM
jblum8156's Avatar
jblum8156 jblum8156 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Village of Hemingway
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Maybe it's because

Maybe it's because people choose to live in The Villages. They don't live here to be near work or because their families have always lived here . . .
  #4  
Old 07-22-2009, 07:02 AM
k2at k2at is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bridgeport at Lake Sumter
Posts: 569
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I believe the essence of the problem is that in TV there is a profit motive and emphasis is put on efficiency. In addition, the developer is using his own money and therefore he uses it wisely. Cities and States are "run" by politicians who do not use their 0wn money for operations. They merely vote on how to spend my money over which I have no control. If money is wasted, just tax those concerned a bit more to cover the liabilities; which they don't even cover anymore.

Add to the pie the fact that money is allocated for projects in the politician's home district which are extravagant and wasteful. These projects are initiated to garner votes not because they are a wise expenditure of funds.

Lastly, absent are watchdog agencies, Checks and balances, necessary when one is using other people's money.

The above only scratches the surface but I do not want to aggravate myself anymore than I already have.
  #5  
Old 07-22-2009, 08:33 AM
conn8757 conn8757 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Village of Amelia
Posts: 367
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

It could be the cities are a hundred years old or more - what will TV look like in a hundred years?
__________________
Village of Amelia, Orlando, Fl; Tampa, Fl., Irmo, S.C; Kewanee, Illinois ;Middleton, Ohio; Louisville, Ky; Marietta, Ga.
  #6  
Old 07-22-2009, 08:36 AM
NJblue NJblue is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 4
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default

While I generally agree with the sentiment, to be fair, TV is quite unique in its population and can't be compared to a generic city which can't control who gets to live there. Also, there are other private community developers who are also in dire straits financially (e.g. WCI), so it is hard to say that the answer is always privatization.
  #7  
Old 07-22-2009, 12:21 PM
SteveFromNY's Avatar
SteveFromNY SteveFromNY is offline
Eternal Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,197
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Certainly TV is not thriving merely because it is a private business. Too many businesses fail for it to be that simple. They have a successful business model for sure, attracting and retaining villagers with the array of amenities and lifestyle, and that contributes to its success. That array of amenities, coupled with an aging, active adult population, makes TV developers sort of umbrella salesmen in the rain.
IMHO, the reason cities have a tough go is fairly simple (and summed up well above by K2AT); politicians / greed / corruption coupled with a decreasing tax base because everyone is moving to TV.
  #8  
Old 07-22-2009, 07:40 PM
tpop1's Avatar
tpop1 tpop1 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Clinton, CT Sarasota, FL, The Villages - July 10, 2009
Posts: 694
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default TV vs. Cities

Among other things, TV has…..

- No politicians, therefore no made up jobs for political supporters,
- Over 55 population, therefore limited education budget,
- Financially solid population, therefore limited social services required,
- Fairly new infrastructure; therefore lower maintenance costs, and
- Tightly controlled governance, therefore little need to please constituencies with costly pet projects.
  #9  
Old 07-22-2009, 07:47 PM
Keedy Keedy is offline
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Massachusetts for now
Posts: 1,169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tpop1 View Post
Among other things, TV has…..

- No politicians, therefore no made up jobs for political supporters,
- Over 55 population, therefore limited education budget,
- Financially solid population, therefore limited social services required,
- Fairly new infrastructure; therefore lower maintenance costs, and
- Tightly controlled governance, therefore little need to please constituencies with costly pet projects.
Yep....No schools.
  #10  
Old 07-22-2009, 08:25 PM
Yoda Yoda is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Villages
Posts: 1,050
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talk Host View Post
Why is that when a private developer like The Villages builds and operates a community, it seems to thrive. Yet cities, run by elected officials, are in desperate financial straits all across the country.

Here, we have golf courses, pools, recreation centers, good roads, hundreds, if not thousands of houses being built, a fire department with good equipment and many other desirable amenities.

In almost every other community, they are laying off police and fire, raising taxes, cutting services and generally shutting down.

I guess the short answer is that cities run on tax money and The Villages runs on profit from building houses. I'm sure the answer is deeper than that but can cities learn something from The Villages?
For Gods sake end this thread. If "they" find out about TV they may decide that we need "Real change."

Yoda

A member of the loyal opposition
  #11  
Old 07-23-2009, 12:02 AM
Muncle's Avatar
Muncle Muncle is offline
Eternal Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Until noon, probably in bed.
Posts: 1,674
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keedy View Post
Yep....No schools.

Actually, phenomenal schools, without which TV would certainly suffer for many reasons.

http://www.thevillagescharterschool.org/


`
__________________
Kansas City, MO; Alamo & Albuquerque NM; Quad Cities; St Louis; DC ~ NOVA; Nuernberg; Heidelberg; DC ~ NOVA; Liberty Park ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Life is like a sewer. What you get out of it depends upon what you put into it.
~~~~~~
And it's Munc"L"e, not Munc"I"e
  #12  
Old 07-23-2009, 07:19 AM
Keedy Keedy is offline
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Massachusetts for now
Posts: 1,169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default I am a Big Fan of Charter Schools

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muncle View Post

Actually, phenomenal schools, without which TV would certainly suffer for many reasons.

http://www.thevillagescharterschool.org/


`
........because they don't have to adhere to any silly union curriculum. The teacher's union disdain them as they are considered competition. I know of teachers that took a pay cut because they couldn't stomach "government schools" any longer.
  #13  
Old 07-23-2009, 03:01 PM
KayakerNC's Avatar
KayakerNC KayakerNC is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talk Host View Post
Why is that when a private developer like The Villages builds and operates a community, it seems to thrive. Yet cities, run by elected officials, are in desperate financial straits all across the country.

Here, we have golf courses, pools, recreation centers, good roads, hundreds, if not thousands of houses being built, a fire department with good equipment and many other desirable amenities.

In almost every other community, they are laying off police and fire, raising taxes, cutting services and generally shutting down.

I guess the short answer is that cities run on tax money and The Villages runs on profit from building houses. I'm sure the answer is deeper than that but can cities learn something from The Villages?
So....what happens after build-out?
__________________
KayakerNC
Mt Clemens, MI
Newport, NC
Suffering from TV envy
  #14  
Old 07-23-2009, 03:44 PM
Muncle's Avatar
Muncle Muncle is offline
Eternal Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Until noon, probably in bed.
Posts: 1,674
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talk Host View Post
Why is that when a private developer like The Villages builds and operates a community, it seems to thrive. Yet cities, run by elected officials, are in desperate financial straits all across the country.

Here, we have golf courses, pools, recreation centers, good roads, hundreds, if not thousands of houses being built, a fire department with good equipment and many other desirable amenities.

In almost every other community, they are laying off police and fire, raising taxes, cutting services and generally shutting down.

I guess the short answer is that cities run on tax money and The Villages runs on profit from building houses. I'm sure the answer is deeper than that but can cities learn something from The Villages?
TH, I gotta disagree on your last point. TV does not run on profits from home sales. It "runs" on a combination of fees and taxes. New development such as new rec centers, pools, exec courses, and trails is the product of home sales but once in, these items are operated, maintained, etc., without financial input from the developer. In fact, as the IRS is happy to point out, these items are sold early on by the developer to the us. Our funding plants the flowers in the round-abouts, not the developer's. Country clubs and their golf courses, the Polo Fields, and the various restaurants and stores are entrepreneurial actions of the developer and others. Very possibly, the developer may well use some profits from home sales to support some of these endeavors.

I believe the main difference between TV and municipalities facing financial ruin is that TV has no permanent underclass which it must support. Sure, parts of the pre-Historic section are fairly old and in poor shape compared to the areas in District 6 or 7, but these are not welfare warrens. Not so much smaller towns, but cities have a self-perpetuating class of people who are recipients of government services yet contribute nothing to the public coffers. TV doesn't have that situation.

And if you do not agree with me, then you, sir, are worse than Al Gore.





`
__________________
Kansas City, MO; Alamo & Albuquerque NM; Quad Cities; St Louis; DC ~ NOVA; Nuernberg; Heidelberg; DC ~ NOVA; Liberty Park ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Life is like a sewer. What you get out of it depends upon what you put into it.
~~~~~~
And it's Munc"L"e, not Munc"I"e

Last edited by Muncle; 07-23-2009 at 03:47 PM.
Closed Thread


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 PM.