Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, General Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/)
-   -   Why does it takes so long to get released from the hospital after doctor's ok? (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/why-does-takes-so-long-get-released-hospital-after-doctors-ok-140525/)

TraceyMooreRN 01-27-2015 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KyWoman (Post 1001875)
Dillywho, as a retired RN, I can't tell you how much I appreciate your post! You nailed it!


DITTO ....GREAT JOB great post from a working RN waiting to discharge patients too...

DougB 01-28-2015 12:20 AM

More important to me than how long it takes to get checked out is how fast I get checked in.

Barefoot 01-28-2015 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dillywho (Post 1001338)
I seem to always be on the other side of the coin in discussions, but I try to look at all aspects of subjects.

I have talked about this with our doctors and have noticed a change in how they talk about it to their patients. I have also put it on every hospital follow-up survey. Just because Doctor A tells you that he is discharging you, does not translate to right away for many reasons. Many of them now say, "You can go home today, but I cannot tell you a time so just sit back and relax in the meantime."

I will try and list some of the reasons I know about:

He/she often has many patients on the same floor and must complete paperwork (write orders for all, including the decision to release along with writing scripts, etc.). Seeing the patients includes answering their questions, reviewing care plans with them, explaining why they are perhaps ordering additional tests, etc. This takes time and they are not going to sign off on everything until all of this has been done and they have gone over everything with the staff. They do not do all of this one patient at a time.

Sometimes, you have to be seen by all your doctors (specialist(s), primary) and then they have to sign off before the hospital doctor can. Not all doctors can/do make rounds at the same time. Some do rounds after their surgeries have been completed and/or emergencies addressed.

Nurses cannot tell Patient B that they will have to wait for their meds or care because Patient A has been told he/she can go home today and will be upset if they don't get IV's out, discharge papers signed by them, etc., right away. RN's are the ones that have to do all of this and are the only ones allowed to dispense meds or do discharges.

Last, but not least, everything comes to a screeching halt if one of the patients gets into a life-threatening situation and all resources are directed to that patient. I'm sure someone was waiting impatiently to go home when my husband went into cardiac arrest in 2013. Because of the skills and teamwork that morning, I still have him today.

I guess all I am trying to say is that all these people have a job to do and it absolutely has to be done correctly; maybe not yours, but someone's life might be at stake. Nurses and doctors are dedicated people; otherwise they would have chosen much easier professions for themselves. Any business, including hospitals and doctors, is about money. No money equals no hospital or any other business. All of us not in business worked for money....nothing wrong with that, either. The fact that these people have to make life and death decisions everyday is priceless. I cannot imagine having the burden of having to tell someone that their loved one is going to die no matter what or has died, despite all efforts to the contrary nor can I imagine having a job that someone's life depends on how I do that job.

Please try a little more understanding and patience. Hospitals are miserable necessities and not 5-star hotels as some patients seem to think by the way they treat the nursing staff when they are there. They cannot leave just because their shift ended at 6:00 or whatever. If they are in the middle of some patient's care, they can't just say, "Sorry, my day is done.", but continue that care until it is finished. Sometimes a new patient is admitted 45 minutes prior to their shift end and they have to stay until everything is set up with that patient. There is much work behind the scenes that many people never know about.

I personally think that nurses are underpaid Angels. :angel:

maru8 02-05-2015 04:25 PM

I went through the same mess at U F Health, a research facility. It was an act of God to get out of there. I would have walked out but my wife said that if anything happened my insurance would not cover it. The bandits have you at their mercy!!!

Warren Kiefer 02-06-2015 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1002117)
I am bumping this again and hoping the OP will read it and respond.

While this is a very educated and sane response, my original point is not exactly addressed. My point was simple, why should a patient have to sometimes wait up to eight hours for a hospital doctor to sign release papers. This hospital doctor being someone who has never provided a second of the patients care. And this being after the patient's primary doctor has already signed release papers.

dbussone 02-06-2015 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warren Kiefer (Post 1007579)
While this is a very educated and sane response, my original point is not exactly addressed. My point was simple, why should a patient have to sometimes wait up to eight hours for a hospital doctor to sign release papers. This hospital doctor being someone who has never provided a second of the patients care. And this being after the patient's primary doctor has already signed release papers.

As I noted previously, once your attending physician has signed your discharge orders, and your nurse has provided you with any prescriptions, discharge instructions, and follow-up appointments, you are free to leave. A hospital physician (Hospitalist) has no bearing if he was not involved in your care. If you are delayed because of a hospitalist, that is a rule of that hospital - and not a common practice. Ask to speak to the nurse manager or supervisor for an explanation. If you get no satisfaction ask for the case manager to whom you are assigned. Still no satisfaction, go (have your advocate/spouse/friend go) to administration and raise a ruckus. A decently run hospital wants to have you leave as soon as your physician says you can. A decently run hospital has case management/discharge planning working on your discharge plan as soon as you are admitted. A hospital with decent management wants to stop incurring costs on your behalf as soon as they can. (For a patient to remain in a hospital hours beyond a reasonable discharge time costs a lot. Meals, perhaps continuing medications, nursing time - all are wasted.)

If this was a practice in a hospital under my responsibility it would not last for long. If it is happening in a hospital you use, my guess is that the hospital is using this process to be sure all the insurance "I"s are dotted and "t"s are crossed. Case management and nursing should be checking things from the time of admission, and reminding physicians to write orders, etc. that way you can leave at an appropriate time. My opinion is that your hospital has a funky discharge process in place - and it's not the nurses fault.

TVMayor 02-06-2015 11:33 AM

The quickest way to get released is go before a judge and post bond.:popcorn:

RVRoadie 02-06-2015 01:15 PM

Welcome to the world of Hospitalists. These are the people that are there to make sure your care meets Federal Standards. Never mind what your doctor says, these people know best. Two years ago, I voluntarily let the ER admit me, against my better judgement. Once you get assigned a Hospitalist (the docs with the lowest bids), your care is out of your hands. After three days, I had to text my wife to come in and hound them until I was released. Never again.

Warren Kiefer 02-06-2015 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbussone (Post 1007618)
As I noted previously, once your attending physician has signed your discharge orders, and your nurse has provided you with any prescriptions, discharge instructions, and follow-up appointments, you are free to leave. A hospital physician (Hospitalist) has no bearing if he was not involved in your care. If you are delayed because of a hospitalist, that is a rule of that hospital - and not a common practice. Ask to speak to the nurse manager or supervisor for an explanation. If you get no satisfaction ask for the case manager to whom you are assigned. Still no satisfaction, go (have your advocate/spouse/friend go) to administration and raise a ruckus. A decently run hospital wants to have you leave as soon as your physician says you can. A decently run hospital has case management/discharge planning working on your discharge plan as soon as you are admitted. A hospital with decent management wants to stop incurring costs on your behalf as soon as they can. (For a patient to remain in a hospital hours beyond a reasonable discharge time costs a lot. Meals, perhaps continuing medications, nursing time - all are wasted.)

If this was a practice in a hospital under my responsibility it would not last for long. If it is happening in a hospital you use, my guess is that the hospital is using this process to be sure all the insurance "I"s are dotted and "t"s are crossed. Case management and nursing should be checking things from the time of admission, and reminding physicians to write orders, etc. that way you can leave at an appropriate time. My opinion is that your hospital has a funky discharge process in place - and it's not the nurses fault.

I LOVE YOUR RESPONSE !! But let me tell you what I was told. First, I recently was told that most hospitals have a Hospitalist. I was also told the same Hospitalist serves both the Villages hospital and the Leesburg hospital. This information came from a board member who did say they were working on the problem of delayed discharges. In my case, my nurse said she had prepared all the necessary paperwork and only that remaining was the release signature of the Hospital doctor. After many hours, I did discuss my plight with the head nurse who told me that if I chose to leave without the hospital doctor's release, there was a chance Medicare would refuse to participate in the cost of my stay. This concerned me enough that I with street clothing on, waited nearly 9 hours for the final signature.:clap2:

dbussone 02-06-2015 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warren Kiefer (Post 1007906)
I LOVE YOUR RESPONSE !! But let me tell you what I was told. First, I recently was told that most hospitals have a Hospitalist. I was also told the same Hospitalist serves both the Villages hospital and the Leesburg hospital. This information came from a board member who did say they were working on the problem of delayed discharges. In my case, my nurse said she had prepared all the necessary paperwork and only that remaining was the release signature of the Hospital doctor. After many hours, I did discuss my plight with the head nurse who told me that if I chose to leave without the hospital doctor's release, there was a chance Medicare would refuse to participate in the cost of my stay. This concerned me enough that I with street clothing on, waited nearly 9 hours for the final signature.:clap2:

It is true that most hospitals have hospitalists. I have seen hospitalists employed or contracted by insurance companies. Guess how quickly they want to get you discharged? I have seen Hospitalists employed or contracted by hospitals. The ones I know also want to see you discharged in a timely manner. Keep that board member's phone number handy for the next time (hopefully not) you are in the hospital here. One Hospitalist between two hospitals is a joke. That doc is THE bottleneck in the entire discharge process.

It is generally thought that a census of 15 patients is appropriate for a Hospitalist. (see: http://www.todayshospitalist.com/ind...s_read&cnt=824). Now that's if the doc is managing the care of those 15 patients. As of 2012, any relationship between care provided by hospitalists and improvement in outcomes had not been established. So, we have inconclusive proof that hospitalists have any beneficial impact on patient care. In your case we know they have a negative impact.

dbussone 02-06-2015 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warren Kiefer (Post 1007906)
I LOVE YOUR RESPONSE !! But let me tell you what I was told. First, I recently was told that most hospitals have a Hospitalist. I was also told the same Hospitalist serves both the Villages hospital and the Leesburg hospital. This information came from a board member who did say they were working on the problem of delayed discharges. In my case, my nurse said she had prepared all the necessary paperwork and only that remaining was the release signature of the Hospital doctor. After many hours, I did discuss my plight with the head nurse who told me that if I chose to leave without the hospital doctor's release, there was a chance Medicare would refuse to participate in the cost of my stay. This concerned me enough that I with street clothing on, waited nearly 9 hours for the final signature.:clap2:

P.S. if Medicare did have a problem you would win the appeal and most likely the hospital would not receive reimbursement. And they could not turn around and try to make you pay. Guess why? You did have an appropriate discharge from your physician, the Hospitalist was an agent of the hospital acting on the hospital's behalf - not yours - and the Hospitalist was not involved in your care.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.