jrref |
05-24-2025 10:00 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564
(Post 2433740)
I don't know enough about the physical layout of fiber systems or where the switching centers are. I find it difficult to believe that Quantum installed several thousand strands of fiber from the Villages to wherever their switches are so there is likely some physical consolidation going on somewhere closer.
"the buffering stopped when doing nothing but switching to fiber". But is it true that nothing was done but switching to fiber? Just switching from Xfinity to Quantum means switching data centers and internet onramps. Certainly, the modem needed to be changed to accommodate a fiber input rather than a cable input. Unless the installation had separate modem and router boxes then changing the router also changed the modem. Then, you also advocate locating the router in different locations and using the wifi pods for better coverage.
It could very well be that an overloaded fiber infrastructure was causing buffering. It could also be a particularly active street, a faulty cable, a faulty cable connection, or a malfunctioning concentrator box. Without more investigation and numbers there is no way to prove just what it was. Switching to fiber solved the buffering but, there is a lot more than "nothing" involved when switching from cable to fiber.
|
Well I do know how Quantum's fiber infrastructure is layed out since I worked in this area at Verizon and with speaking to the tech's at Quantum it's very similar. So the way it works is each customer does have a unique glass fiber from their home to a nearby hub. From that Hub each customer has a unique multiplexed connection via lighwave to the central office. The central office could have connections to the internet gateway or it could be routed to a main gateway hub in Lumen's network. In doing trace routes from my home, we are connected to one of the main Lumen hubs where the gateways are located. With cable, the back-end systems and gateways are similar to Quantum's as you alluded to. They have fiber infrastructure as well. The difference is the cable connection from your home to their fiber infrastructure is copper and is using shared bandwidth of that copper cable which is limited compared to fiber and thus once of the possible causes of the bottleneck. Many cable companies have expanded their fiber network to get it closer to the subscriber but the last mile as they call it is copper with all the physical limitations of that technology.
With fiber in some areas of the Villages, whether you need it or not, you can get up to 8GBs internet service vs a max of 1Gbs from cable. Just different technologies.
You are correct in assuming the change out of the WiFi equipment could also make a difference and it would but in all cases I evaluated the cable WiFi placement and equipment and it was fine.
All this said, my findings are not scientific since I don't have enough cases to reference. The purpose of my comment was just to point out what I have been seeing in the switch-overs to fiber that I've been involved in. In all cases, the Villager I was helping relayed the before and after performance to me and was very satisified with the better performance of fiber.
Hope this helps.
|