![]() |
Remember, you can do anything with permission, south of 466. Take it by ARC. They may agree it's lovely. North of 466 their restrictions are less, so if you haven't moved here and are pining for a cannon or a large carved bear to show your individuality, go for it.
|
Quote:
|
Loving the Villages....residents are a hoot! Thanks for all the advise, rule interpretation, etc. Know that my lovely mermaid is sunning herself in private in our backyard. Glad to hear that it was just some law enforcing neighbor/guest that reported my transgression and not a vigilant Troll police making his rounds....making his quota of complaint citations! I have no problem with the restrictions, but did believe it didn't apply to my area since others had lawn ornaments.....but now we are ALL in compliance. Viva complaint management, long live Mrs. Kravites
|
Listen to graciegirl re the ARC. We put in a two-level herb garden by our front door. We got approval from the ARC just to be safe. Now no herb-hating troll can take it away from us.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
THANK YOU for clarifying. It is so lovely where you live. I do so like simple and unadorned. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For all of you reading this, please do not try to think that all of north of 466 are a wide-open area. I have seen only one cannon on this side and it is aimed at the area south of 466. As old as it is I doubt if it would hit the house across the street. :pepper2: Z |
Quote:
Go to Village Community Development Districts for the real info. I previously posted this same info on this thread (post#46) but it has been largely ignored. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hi observer: I suppose one could define people who report infractions as bullies cowards, etc. I suppose one could say that its unfair that ARC, (District function) forces residents to complain before they will do their due diligence. I suppose these residents would need not to complain if other residents complied with their deed restrictions, eliminating the need I suppose residents could all mind their own business but I suspected we would discover a whole lot of toilets contain Ivy sitting in residents front yards. Personal Best Regards: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I guess I'm in the minority here, but I don't have a problem with a bird bath, a small tasteful garden ornament placed in with your flowers and bushes, or even a small plaque telling the world your grand kids think you are the best Grandmother in the whole world. In fact I don't really notice what other people are doing, unless it is outrageous.
What would really bother me would be a loud TV on someone's open lanai, loud music at their private pool, outside parties several nights a week .......... I do, however, get very annoyed that we cannot seem to do anything to help the people who live next door to abandoned properties, that really is disgraceful and is far more egregious than an ornament in someone's yard! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Abandoned properties or not taken care of properties.
They have had two information filled articles on the not to be named online news. "They" will come and cut the grass and trim, but have to be notified each time. They place a lien against the property for the service. There is only so much anyone can do as the property does not belong to The Villages or to us. However some very good suggestions have been offered as to what neighbors can do. I think it wouldn't hurt to have an email campaign to the bank. One woman talked the owner into selling. She had moved away.
Thank goodness there are not a lot of them, but when they are near you they affect values in a negative way. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't understand why Community Watch is not empowered to report infractions. |
Quote:
Right again, Doc. I present this lovely creature as evidence. http://modcloth.files.wordpress.com/...ncyladybum.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Somebody's actually DONE that! If you allow for some yard ornaments that look okay, eventually you will have a neighbor-hoarder that has the front yard full and looking like a junk yard, while normal people in front of or beside them have their home listed for sale and can't attract a buyer. Didn't people learn how hard it can be to sell their well-kept, beautiful home when trying to do so in other states a few years ago?? Some seem to never think of anybody but themselves, and never beyond next week. |
Quote:
Quote:
I have since learned there is now no enforcement in that community. The HOA which was supposed to be governing was disbanded as a result of no one willing to serve in any capacity. As to CW being empowered to enforce, there have been a few references to that in local media. Frankly I don't remember the reasons given but it seemed to make sense to me at the time. I have never heard of any situation where infractions have been reported and not investigated by Community Standards. I am satisfied with the current system, recognizing it is not perfect. It means my neighbor can place a lawn ornament on his/her lawn and if no one finds it objectionable it can stay. It also means if I sell my house and the new owner finds it objectionable he/she can file an anonymous complaint and have it removed. |
Quote:
neighbors complained on a regular basis, some even came and cut the grass themselves my husband even did once. This went on for almost 3 years! Also there are a lot more foreclosed homes than we'd like to think here. I think it's gone down a bit though. |
Quote:
Community Standards is not in the business of cutting lawns on a scheduled basis. It was suggested in the article in the DS to do just that, call and keep calling. |
Quote:
Mrs Big Butt Bloomers and a flock of pink flamingos would be allowed in districts one, two and three, and all of Lake County in The Villages, but not allowed in districts four through twelve. The problem arises when residents don't like the rules of their district. There are choices. Choose the one that's right for you and abide by it. |
Here's a good one
Drive down Cazaras Ave. in Santo Domingo and check out Snow White and all seven of her dwarfs lined up......Classy!
Personally I wish zero lawn ornaments were permitted. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would be willing to bet that most of those who said they bought here because of deed restrictions, never read them before they signed a contract.
Deed restrictions are both good and bad, depending upon who wrote them, if they've been updated in a timely manner, etc. I must admit there are some pretty strange ones in TV's restrictions. Some of the things I have found that don't make sense are we must maintain a certain percentage of grass. Why? On the other hand, TV changed the choice of grass from St. Augustine to Zoysia. They both require about the same amount of water so why the change? Is it cheaper? Going back to the percentage of grass, if they are trying to restrict water usage, doesn't it make sense that less grass is better? Then there is the rule that you can't have a lampost in your back yard because it will annoy neighbors. Do you know anyone who doesn't have some kind of window treatment on their bedroom window? Furthermore, if you enclose your lanai and make it a permanent room like the rest of the house, code enforcement requirements say you must have exterior lighting permanently installed on the house. Is there really a difference if you have say, coach lights on your house or if you have a lamppost? No! Of course not. There are many other things that simply do not make sense. Deed restrictions are not always good and if you've ever iived in other communities that have them, you know what I mean. |
Quote:
|
This thread has degenerated to bickering. The topic has been covered. This thread is closed.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.