I too have observed the OP's original point that there appears to be distinct differences in views expressed by those over 65 and those under 65. Sixty-five happens to be the current age that aligns to the significant transition that occurred during the coming of age decade, the 60's.

My sister is 67 and I just turned 62. Our differences are not generational, but the result of our timing and experiences during a time when the status quo was no longer acceptable. Both of us attended the University of Dayton where my sister and her friends wore coordinated outfits, were required to wear beanies as freshman, and loved the Kingston Trio. Just 5 years later, my class was wearing jeans and sandals, would have left school if someone had made us wear beanies, and loved the music and spirit of Woodstock.

Simple examples, but examples none the less of the transition that took place during the 60's and how it shaped the differences within a generation.

I am sorry you didn't like the Kingston Trio.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...16662AA99F6E25

OK, here's a Woodstock example to helo bridge the gap from the Kingston Trio to Santana.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AqZceAQSJvc

Wow! Awesome instrumentals and the drumming at 2:50 -- and he holds his sticks the traditional way not seen much in recent times.

The first thing I noticed was the natural afro hair. I'm always wondering why, since the women's lib and "black is beautiful" age, that we never see African American women with natural afro hairstyling. It's always straightened with lots of styling hours involved. But I guess it's quite limiting to one style to go natural.

I also noticed that the group actually looks more "clean cut" (!!) than most rock groups of the 80s, 90s and forward. No pierced faces, tattoos, etc.

As Paul Harvey would say "here is the rest of the story"

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=K8LcqwL8a00

And don't forget about the Yeah Yeah Yeahs

Turn it up!!!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMMkP_ofpXg]Yeah Yeah Yeahs - Gold Lion - YouTube[/ame]

That drummer is Michael Shrieve, he was about 20 years old at the time and played on the first 8 Santana albums. That was their best lineup, the vocalist was keyboardist Greg Rolie who along with guitarist Neil Schon left Santana about the same time and formed Journey in the mid 70's. Greg Rolie was the original vocalist on the first three Journey albums, but eventually he was replaced by Steve Perry when the record label wanted a more radio friendly sound. In the 1980's you might remember the super group album HSAS, that featured vocalist Sammy Hagar, guitarist Neil Schon, bassist Kenny Aaronson & drummer Michael Shrieve).

http://somethingelsereviews.com/wp-c...neal-schon.jpg

Under 65. Loved Paul Harvey, Kingston Trio, Santana, Jazz in general, Platters, Maroon 5, yada, yada, yada....not sure age makes a difference. Just my humble opinion.

I prefer 70's - 80's metal, ie. Aerosmith, AC/DC, Def Leppard... My Sirius/XM presets range from Symphony Hall to Ozzys Boneyard. Not a huge Hillbilly Pop (new country music) fan, but if it's live??? Bring it on. Live Blues - Doesn't get any better. Definitely under 65.

I like you West Virginia fellow. I hope that you move close to us and we can be friends with you two.

Well this thread proves one thing for sure Can't trust anyone under 70. Those 60's 70's kids who were out to change the world missed the mark and in my view should have deferred to the 50's crowd they had a better handle on it all

Cést la vie

Heavy metal is great workout music! Def Leppard especially! Also, under 65.

Notice I was talking about "looking" clean cut, as in no facial piercings, tattoos, etc. On first view I was thinking they had that sweaty, "Where am I?" look on their faces.

Sad that people still think they can do drugs without ugly consequences.

I understand. I do think Carlos took heed which is why he is still performing today.