[Nucky]

Originally Posted by Barefoot

Yes. As long as they aren't violating the 20% rule. And I think we have a long, long way to go.

I thought that was the answer. They have no intention of having children. I told Mrs. Nucky we shouldn't tell them where we moved. Oh Well!

[Boomer]

Originally Posted by Nucky

I'm 59, my wife is 39. Are we ok? Can we stay? I put the 39 thing in case my wife reads the first part of this post! - - - - - - - - - - - -

You, Nucky, are a good and very wise man.

[biker1]

Please see post #35 regarding residents vs. residences. You can also see the language on your deed restrictions that are available on districtgov.org.



[QUOTE=VillagerNut;1438200]

Originally Posted by Jack9696

Your post is absolutely incorrect! Look at what Gracie posted with a link to the correct site. The correct rule is 80% of all residents including guests/visitors must be 55 or older! The districts keeps control by how many recreation IDs are handed out! When you get an ID you have to give a birthdate. The latest figure I have heard is 8% are under 55 years old! If anybody knows of a person under 19 years old living here more than 30 days a year they need to be turned into community standards. That is a huge violation that needs to get resolved ASAP! Unfortunately when parents keep supporting children that have no initiative to maintain a job or have substance abuse issues there will probably be some crimes committed by those individuals since they have no way to support their habits!

[njbchbum]

Originally Posted by Mrs. Robinson

Correct!
Perhaps I did a poor job of wording what I meant. I do know what the law is.

Phew! So many folks either don't know the law or they misspeak the law! Glad that you know it! It's just that misspeak between residence and residents can mean a great bid difference in percentages!


Have a great eclipse day!