![]() |
Quote:
|
Warranties are certainly a good deal for whoever sells them.
Insure lives and homes and car insurance in case of an accident. In other words insure what can give you a horrendous loss. When I am asked if I want insurance on an item I just bought for $ 15 we know the idea of insurance has run amuck |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
At about 50K miles, the Navigation system took a dump and they replaced it for $50. Without the warranty, it was a $3750 repair. There were a few other smaller things that they covered along the way so I felt it was well worth the price (about $5K worth of work in total)... |
But "Darlings" how can you go wrong!!!!!!! Hahahaha
|
When I bought my new Dodge Challenger I got a lifetime bumper to bumper warranty through Chrysler. From a forum a dealership in Hickory NC was selling them at the time for way less than any the dealership I bought my car at. At the time I was planning on keeping the car until I could no longer drive. I figured everyone says Dodge cars have issues and as long as I was planning on keeping it it would be a good move. In 11 years I have not had to use it oddly enough.
We also bought a used 2016 Civic at a Honda dealership. Since this car had so much electronics I opted for the Allstate 5 year warranty. Good thing we did. The AC died 3 times and the steering went wacky. If we would not have bought that warranty it would have cost us $7,000. I AM very leary of the TV ads for extended warranties yes. I never bought a warranty before these two cars. However, with all of the new technology in todays cars I wonder if it is time to get a warranty. Those radio/backup camera screen things are $4,000 plus. If it goes you have to replace it as it controls so many things. The one in our Civic goes bonkers once in a while now. All of this new camera stuff in the front and side mirrors are going to be very expensive to replace. |
Run!!!! Rip-off!
|
Specific to the OP question....the TV ads associated with that segment of auto warranties, are the issue. As previously stated by many of us. Many are confusing dealer products as the same as whats been proposed...they are not. One 'covers' site unseen, higher mileage, older model vehicles vs in house new/certified preowned stock that has a totally different business model. Why anyone would attempt to buy this type of 'coverage' for a clunker when that same money couldve been used for a better, more reliable purchase, is beyond me
|
These "Car Shield" TV commercials often feature a celebrity, with a net worth of more than $10 million, claiming that they have Car Shield. An extended auto warranty only kicks in after the manufacturer warranty expires. Do you really think that these wealthy celebrities would even keep a car that long?
|
Quote:
|
Car Warranty
Quote:
|
My son bought one thru the dealership when he bought a used car. Transmission went out after 1 month, he was told they would not cover it because it was so soon after he bought it. They said they would cover 50% just to be nice. I told him to threaten to sue fpr misrepresentation on the used car, I'm sure they knew it had transmission problems, and they sold him the warranty, knowing they would not honor it. At that, they fixed the transmission for free and refunded him the money he paid for the extended warranty. It's a scam.
Car is fine now 1 year later. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.