Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Non Villages Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/)
-   -   Buying from China (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/buying-china-354355/)

jimjamuser 11-11-2024 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eyc234 (Post 2385374)
:bigbow::bigbow: Simple economics, Americans want cheap and will not pay for higher cost goods. There is a reason WalMart, Amazon, Dollar stores, Temu and others outside are huge, cheap goods for cheap price. Not saying it is good or bad, just a fact. Same will happen for groceries when the labor that produces them is eliminated prices will climb. Home prices will go up when laborers that do all the real work leave.

I believe that in Europe they build their new houses on a factory assembly line. On site home building in the US could be a big reason that homes are so expensive.

jimjamuser 11-11-2024 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueash (Post 2385378)
Understanding that tariffs, a form of a tax, will absolutely increase the cost of those products as the importer has higher costs.. those costs will be passed to the consumer, while the tariff imposed is collected by the Federal treasury. So now the US gov't has more money, but the consumer has less. This is another example of a regressive tax as consumers get hit but those who are not consuming, the 1%ers who are saving and investing not buying with most of their income are not being taxed. So the tax burden is imposed on those who can least afford it and the benefit of not needing to consider a higher marginal rate from the rich benefits who??

I agree completely ! And if the lower and middle classes are penalized that would make America WEAKER. It was the OPPOSITE in the 50s and 60s which are decades that people rave about because of the STRENGTH of the middle class. Starting about 1975 the US tax system began to penalize America and the GREAT American middle class. Today couples must work 2 jobs and save until they are in their 40s before they can afford a house. There are lots of problems today and FEW solutions.

blueash 11-11-2024 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElDiabloJoe (Post 2385786)
Thank you, that was a typo. Should read USSC=9. The United States Supreme Court should be codified to be made up of 9 members. No stacking of the court by increasing the number of justices so one side or the other can appoint a new majority by stacking it with new justices of their preference. I will attempt to go back and fix the original post.

Thanks for the clarification. I am not a supporter of having an open option to add new Supreme Court Justices. But 9 is much too few. Nine was selected in 1869 when the population was 31 million. We now have 10 times that many. And we have more laws to adjudicate. So we need more on SCOTUS. I think the proposal to have at least 1 justice for each district (13) is a minimum. And I think we need a mandatory retirement age say 80.

There is an interesting suggestion that all justices get an 18 year appointment which means one new justice every 2 years which balances it so no one President gets to pack the court. This would happen the 1st and 3rd year of a term so not in an election year. And we need a code of ethics. At least the code that applies to every other Federal Judge should apply to a Justice.

biker1 11-11-2024 01:44 PM

What the Heritage Foundation has determined or not determined is irrelevant; they don't make the laws or enforce the laws. Your suggestion that they are running the country as of January 2025 is more nonsensical thinking on your part. Suggesting that US citizens can be put on a plane to nowhere specific is also nonsensical. It doesn't work that way regardless of what you think, thank God, as reaffirmed by the recent election. Get a grip.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2385742)
The Heritage Foundation has determined that the Constitution is no longer appropriate and needs to be changed. They are running this country as of January 20, 2025 (one might argue they're already running it, but I try to avoid hyperbole).

The Constitution can be further amended, and the 14th can be repealed with new amendments. Just like the amendment that created the prohibition, and the one that repealed it.

They can be deported anywhere, really. Whether the country on the other end accepts them or not is not America's problem. They could be deported to an island somewhere. Or America could vote to annex Guam as a military prison (it's already an American territory) and send them all there.


Bill14564 11-11-2024 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biker1 (Post 2385853)
What the Heritage Foundation has determined or not determined is irrelevant; they don't make the laws or enforce the laws. Your suggestion that they are running the country as of January 2025 is more nonsensical thinking on your part. Suggesting that US citizens can be put on a plane to nowhere specific is also nonsensical. It doesn't work that way regardless of what you think, thank God, as reaffirmed by the recent election. Get a grip.

We shall see

biker1 11-11-2024 02:19 PM

We shall see what?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2385860)
We shall see


jimjamuser 11-11-2024 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LianneMigiano (Post 2385359)
I just read of a manufacturing employer who just announced to his entire staff that there was not going to be any Christmas bonus this year due to his need to secure equipment and goods instead - prior to the implementation of tariffs.

Those workers were Scrooged !

eyc234 11-11-2024 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by retiredguy123 (Post 2385793)
OK, the majority of employers who pay their employees in cash are violating the tax laws.

Not at all, as long as you follow tax, FICA and workers comp laws. There is no law detailing how employees are paid their wages. It only takes 28 keystrokes to get the facts.

Topspinmo 11-11-2024 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 2385805)
Germany has more Unionization than the US does today. And they somehow manage to make cars that are sold and prized worldwide.

Only by people who have more money than brains:loco:

Topspinmo 11-11-2024 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 2385796)
Let me say how I avoid buying Chinese-made products. I buy almost ALL of my clothes from thrift stores or garage sales. I can also find hardware and sports equipment that way. For example, I have found almost new softball gloves at Goodwill that are worth $80 for under 10 dollars. I even buy shoes there. I COULD afford to buy new clothes, but they would likely be made in China or another country that does NOT like the US. It is true that items sitting in thrift stores may have been ORIGINALLY made in China, but China does NOT profit when I buy 2nd hand.
........Obviously China and many other countries, are NOT friends of the US. WE have basically, for about 60 years, FUNDED their industrial and military EXPANSION. Today, they threaten the US and align with Russia. They have greater influence in Africa than the US. And are outmaneuvering us in other areas of the world (and SPACE). We should NEVER have funded them and built them up. So, what to do now? I would suggest bringing back SOME manufacturing jobs. And buying products from countries that LIKE the US. Those may be dwindling, but we still have England, Canada, Australia, Finland, and Sweden on our side. Germany and France are having their own problems. So overall, I would be ANTI outsourcing to unfriendly countries and PRO IN-sourcing within the US.

Kind of hard when there no incentive for CEOs to manufacture anything in US when the can just make it china and import here for at least 70% of costs. Plus and big plus! they don’t have deal with EPA or unions.

jimjamuser 11-11-2024 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheWarriors (Post 2385436)
That is just proof the past policies really didn’t work and you are an example of why we shouldn’t continue to ship jobs out of the Country. Many don’t care until it is their job and finances. Just wait until AI takes hold, the number of unemployed Lawyers, Accountants, Investment Analyst, etc, will skyrocket. If your job doesn’t include some hands on activity with people (Nurses, Plumbers, Doctors, Electricians, etc.) plan on large pay reductions and finally the unemployment line.

A.I. could be both good and bad just like social media is. I worry that it takes so much energy to function.

Topspinmo 11-11-2024 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eyc234 (Post 2385874)
Not at all, as long as you follow tax, FICA and workers comp laws. There is no law detailing how employees are paid their wages. It only takes 28 keystrokes to get the facts.

But, there only trusting accountability in paying cash. Come we know why they pay in cash. Contractor’s love cash payments. Why? Trusting accountability.

jimjamuser 11-11-2024 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 2385441)
In certain situations, I totally agree with this statement. People are looking out for their family, their money, when they shop with price in mind. If you learn to be careful with your money, you will be able to take care of yourself and your family.

And if I continue, someone is gonna get mad at me for being political.

The question is,"why was the US middle class better off in 1950 through 1975 than we are today. And that is historic and economical and not political?"

jimjamuser 11-11-2024 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ptmcbriz (Post 2385449)
Oh it’s not just the tariffs that will raise prices, wait until there are no migrant workers to pick all the fresh fruit and vegetables in the fields. Who will pick them? Americans won’t do the job. Wait for your hand picked tomato costs $10 each, IF you can even get any because they have rotted in the fields unpicked.

Legal Americans WOULD do any job where they thought that they were paid enough. Look at the salaries of upper management for any large company. I would rather allow high school students to work 3 or 4 hours per week than have illegal aliens (and armed drug gangs) operating in my town.
.........Also, there are machines designed to pick fruit and tomatoes that have a long shape. And Quaker and Mennonite farmers have no problems picking and selling their produce.

jimjamuser 11-11-2024 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by opinionist (Post 2385468)
Tariffs are intended to bring jobs back into the United States, thereby balancing trade. An additional benefit is a reduction in taxes. If the size of government can be cut by 80%, then taxes can be reduced to zero like in the 1800s. Since 80% of the government is not within the enumerated powers limited by the Constitution, the reduction is required by law. It will be interesting to see what happens.

The world was less complex in 1800 than today. They did not have to worry about having a FCC or a Space Program. The US was insulated against world problems by 2 oceans. We did not get involved with Iran or Israel then.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.