Originally Posted by jackz (Post 364947)

The prosecutor ascertained in cross of the Police Sgt Computer expert , who read the logs of the computer searches, that the search for chloroform occured 3 seconds prior to a myspace search on the same computer. Cindy previously testified that she has never had a myspace account. Bottom line, the person searching for chloroform was also the person searching for myspace. I think Cindy just committed perjury.

Originally Posted by Donna (Post 365018)

I am curious, how Casey can sit there, stone faced while her mom takes the brunt of the computer searches...She is such a mean person!! There is not an ounce of remorse on her part for all she did...

Originally Posted by jackz (Post 365056)

It will be interesting to see if Casey is convicted she will turn around and claim incompetent counsel.

Originally Posted by Barefoot (Post 365079)

Donna, if you google "Sociopath", you'll find that Casey fits the definition in every way! No guilt, no empathy, no remorse, no feelings except for herself.



I think it would be difficult for anyone convicted of a crime to prove incompetent counsel! Otherwise every single convicted prisioner would use legal aid to claim incompetent counsel.

Originally Posted by dillywho (Post 365149)

There is no novelist in the world that could write a story with this many turns and twists.

It's beginning to look like the whole family has known all along what really happened. Family secrets were alluded to from the very first jail visits, through the eulogy, and then to the defense's opening statement. I believe that whatever those secrets are are the key to this whole mess.

I can't help but wonder how Caylee would have turned out had she not died, being brought into such a dysfunctional family. Would she have learned to lie and keep secrets, too? So sad.

Originally Posted by LELANDJANE (Post 365063)

jblum, I heard yesterday that the lawyers were doing this pro bono. Is that not true?

Originally Posted by jackz (Post 365084)

Here is the link to learn a bit about the background of Jose Baez
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jose_Baez

Originally Posted by dillywho (Post 364584)

The State may be trying to pull some fast ones, too. Surely the State has done some research on Roy Kronk and knows this:

Remember what I said previously about Roy Kronk? This morning, Tony Pipitone pointed out that the photos shown yesterday of Caylee's skull in the woods showed that it was buried up to the eye sockets in muck. He also said that Roy Kronk said when he made his "find" that when the skull rolled out, he picked it up by an eye socket and then put it down. (Gracie, would you ask Helene if she remembers this since she's following it all closely as well?) Wonder how he will testify at trial? Kronk's prior statements should be on tape or tv footage somewhere. Could he be involved in some way?

Like I've said before, Casey knows exactly what happened. Guilty of murder warranting the death penalty? I can't see that, yet. The trial still has a long way to go. The truth is out there somewhere, but it may be hidden so well that it can never be found in total.