BrianL99 |
08-27-2024 05:27 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby
(Post 2360049)
Painting the porches was our responsibility. Our condo fee was made higher when the developer - which owned and rented out around half of the properties - was given as many votes as units he owned. So he got to set the rules. He decided that property owners only had to pay one HOA fee per owner, rather than per unit. So he only paid $300/month, just like everyone else - even though he owned almost half the units in the community.
.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainger99
(Post 2360066)
I am not a lawyer but that sounds illegal - or at least should be illegal. He had half the units and only paid one HOA fee?
Any real estate lawyers on TOTV?
|
It doesn't take a real estate lawyer, to sort that one out. It's nonsense. I don't think there are any states in the USA, that don't regulate Condominiums. The entire premise is that fees are based on a percentage of ownership or a percentage of value.
In most states, the Master Deed (which usually sets forth everyone's % ownership), can't be amended, without the agreement of 75% of the ownership interest.
I and another developer own about 60% of the units in a renovated mill building in MA. We have controlling interest in the Condominium, but pursuant to Chapter 183A in MA, we can't change voting power, nor can we change the % of ownership of any owner, without 75% agreement. Even then, voting power is still solely dependent on the % of ownership a person has.
if someone can identify a state were someone can control % of ownership (or voting power), because they own 50% of the units, I'd be shocked.
|