Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Non Villages Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/)
-   -   COVID Breakthrough Rates (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/covid-breakthrough-rates-322920/)

Velvet 08-23-2021 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drducat (Post 1993375)
Wouldn't be laughing if I were you. Do you know if you are one of the 50% whom received only saline?

I think you asked the wrong person.

Bill14564 08-23-2021 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drducat (Post 1993375)
Wouldn't be laughing if I were you. Do you know if you are one of the 50% whom received only saline?

Where in the world of conspiracies did you come up with that fruitcake idea? Or are you really and truly just trolling?

golfing eagles 08-23-2021 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drducat (Post 1993375)
Wouldn't be laughing if I were you. Do you know if you are one of the 50% whom received only saline?

Sorry, not playing that game. I assume that post just baiting the rest of us, since no one could be that stupid.

Swoop 08-23-2021 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Velvet (Post 1993351)
Some deaths we can prevent, those are needless deaths. That is why it hurts so much.

So let me get this straight. The 70,000 deaths weren’t preventable - but the 430 were?!?

Velvet 08-23-2021 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swoop (Post 1993443)
So let me get this straight. The 70,000 deaths weren’t preventable - but the 430 were?!?

Most Covid deaths were preventable once we knew how to protect ourselves. Children depend on adults to protect them.

drducat 08-24-2021 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 1993392)
Where in the world of conspiracies did you come up with that fruitcake idea? Or are you really and truly just trolling?

I think it was from this fruitcake government source the FDA.

https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download


"The safety of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine was evaluated in participants 12 years of age and older in
two clinical studies conducted in the United States, Europe, Turkey, South Africa, and South America.
Study BNT162-01 (Study 1) was a Phase 1/2, two-part, dose-escalation trial that enrolled 60 participants,
18 through 55 years of age. Study C4591001 (Study 2) is a Phase 1/2/3, multicenter, multinational, randomized,
saline placebo-controlled, observer-blind, dose-finding, vaccine candidate-selection (Phase 1) and efficacy
(Phase 2/3) study that has enrolled approximately 46,000 participants, 12 years of age or older. Of these,
approximately 43,448 participants (21,720 Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine; 21,728 placebo) in Phase 2/3
are 16 years of age or older (including 138 and 145 adolescents 16 and 17 years of age in the vaccine and
placebo groups, respectively) and 2,260 adolescents are 12 through 15 years of age (1,131 and 1,129 in the
vaccine and placebo groups, respectively)."

drducat 08-24-2021 03:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drducat (Post 1993462)
I think it was from this fruitcake government source the FDA.

https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download


"The safety of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine was evaluated in participants 12 years of age and older in
two clinical studies conducted in the United States, Europe, Turkey, South Africa, and South America.
Study BNT162-01 (Study 1) was a Phase 1/2, two-part, dose-escalation trial that enrolled 60 participants,
18 through 55 years of age. Study C4591001 (Study 2) is a Phase 1/2/3, multicenter, multinational, randomized,
saline placebo-controlled, observer-blind, dose-finding, vaccine candidate-selection (Phase 1) and efficacy
(Phase 2/3) study that has enrolled approximately 46,000 participants, 12 years of age or older. Of these,
approximately 43,448 participants (21,720 Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine; 21,728 placebo) in Phase 2/3
are 16 years of age or older (including 138 and 145 adolescents 16 and 17 years of age in the vaccine and
placebo groups, respectively) and 2,260 adolescents are 12 through 15 years of age (1,131 and 1,129 in the
vaccine and placebo groups, respectively)."

Not sure how long they continued.........

drducat 08-24-2021 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drducat (Post 1993463)
Not sure how long they continued.........

And how about a vaccine for the vaccine?

Wow....

A drug candidate for treating adverse reactions caused by pathogenic antibodies inducible by COVID-19 virus and vaccines | bioRxivchilout

golfing eagles 08-24-2021 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drducat (Post 1993462)
I think it was from this fruitcake government source the FDA.

https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download


"The safety of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine was evaluated in participants 12 years of age and older in
two clinical studies conducted in the United States, Europe, Turkey, South Africa, and South America.
Study BNT162-01 (Study 1) was a Phase 1/2, two-part, dose-escalation trial that enrolled 60 participants,
18 through 55 years of age. Study C4591001 (Study 2) is a Phase 1/2/3, multicenter, multinational, randomized,
saline placebo-controlled, observer-blind, dose-finding, vaccine candidate-selection (Phase 1) and efficacy
(Phase 2/3) study that has enrolled approximately 46,000 participants, 12 years of age or older. Of these,
approximately 43,448 participants (21,720 Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine; 21,728 placebo) in Phase 2/3
are 16 years of age or older (including 138 and 145 adolescents 16 and 17 years of age in the vaccine and
placebo groups, respectively) and 2,260 adolescents are 12 through 15 years of age (1,131 and 1,129 in the
vaccine and placebo groups, respectively)."

You really can't be serious. That's the study data---of course there is a placebo control group, that's how you evaluate drugs/vaccines/treatments for approval (or EUA) PRIOR to distribution. They were NOT giving placebo when vaccinating the general public.

This emphasizes the basic problem of the internet----people reading something with no idea what it means but considering themselves an expert. Unbelievable.

Love2Swim 08-24-2021 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1993475)
You really can't be serious. That's the study data---of course there is a placebo control group, that's how you evaluate drugs/vaccines/treatments for approval (or EUA) PRIOR to distribution. They were NOT giving placebo when vaccinating the general public.

This emphasizes the basic problem of the internet----people reading something with no idea what it means but considering themselves an expert. Unbelievable.

Agree. :bigbow:

Altavia 08-24-2021 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drducat (Post 1993463)
Not sure how long they continued.........

The trials placebo group was offered to switch to the Vaccine group as soon as it was approved for the general public.

Bill14564 08-24-2021 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drducat (Post 1993464)

Did you actually read the article including the reference they cited for the adverse effects potentially caused by the vaccine? As far as I can tell, their treatment is for an adverse effect that their citation does not identify. As far as a "vaccine for the vaccine," they have a potential solution in search of a problem.

drducat 08-24-2021 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 1993505)
Did you actually read the article including the reference they cited for the adverse effects potentially caused by the vaccine? As far as I can tell, their treatment is for an adverse effect that their citation does not identify. As far as a "vaccine for the vaccine," they have a potential solution in search of a problem.

Point is...Fear Porn. These vaccines are not really going to stop anything...the desired result was not protection from the virus rather keeping one out of the hospital...worked for some and very short lived.

Need a much better solution...that is my whole point.

Bill14564 08-24-2021 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drducat (Post 1993515)
Point is...Fear Porn. These vaccines are not really going to stop anything...the desired result was not protection from the virus rather keeping one out of the hospital...worked for some and very short lived.

Need a much better solution...that is my whole point.

Then you didn't read the article or any of the supporting material?

Many, in the face of hundreds of thousands of deaths in the US alone, feel that keeping one out of the hospital, and alive, is the definition of protection from the virus.

Spreading misinformation and promoting vaccine hesitancy seems to be your whole point. It doesn't matter if the substance of the articles you post supports the scary title or supports your position; throw enough spaghetti against the wall and maybe something will stick.

roscoguy 08-24-2021 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1993296)
Great! This will eliminate the "it's not approved" and "this is all one huge drug trial" as EXCUSES for the anti-vaxxers. Any of them who had been using that excuse will now have to migrate to the "we don't know the long term effects" EXCUSE.

But even if we had conclusive proof that there were no long term effects, the next EXCUSE would be "there's a chip in the vaccine that marks me as a target for alien abduction by insectoids from the Andromeda galaxy"

Enough lame EXCUSES----get vaccinated, if only for your grandchildren!

Quote:

Originally Posted by drducat (Post 1993309)
Until big pharma or the government accepts liability of negative effects of the vaccine, nothing will change. Especially when for the first time in history a vaccine has been approved in less than a year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1993324)
Aha! First migration to the "negative effects" EXCUSE

Sorry GE, but you're most likely wasting your breath & unnecessarily raising your BP. Several weeks ago, I watched a video* of an interview with (IIRC) a psychologist who explained why conspiracy theories are nearly impossible to disprove; they are basically self-healing. When confronted with a provable fact, the narrative just changes to something like 'well then, what about this (tangent/segue)' or 'we all know that (fill in the blank) has lied to us before, so I don't trust anything they say', etc, etc, etc. Once people have bought into the cult mantra, it's exceptionally difficult to 'deprogram' most of them.

* I should try to find the link to the video, but it really doesn't matter...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.