MartinSE |
04-17-2022 11:07 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachKandSportsguy
(Post 2084563)
Maybe, but i also think that this an eggageration as I currently work at a multiple product utility, electric (generation, transmission and distribution) and gas (transmission and distribution) and stating we are late to the game would imply that there have been multiple outages due to cyber attacks, and I have yet to read about many cyber outages in the CNI (critical national infrastructure). There is actually more risk in physical attacks now than cyber attacks. . .
There are several grids in the US, if you are retired for more than 5-10 years, am thinking that you have missed a lot of continued improvements and upgrades, etc. I know that the PG&E sucked with their use of rate tariffs to adequately cover their physical risks, but most companies are continuously upgrading their cyber defenses. We have tripled our budgets in the last 5 years, and are constantly reducing risk entries. The Columbia gas pipeline explosions were due to failed reactions to over pressurization alerts, and they lost their license to operation in MA. But not a cyber attack.
So i am thinking that you are suffering from retirement memories of the old days, since being out of touch with the current working world advances, which are continuous and hidden from everyday retirement life. Oh I so wish I could be retired to get rid of all this working crap. . and forget about my now irrelevant operational finance career.
So yes, when the increased attacks happen, which have been on going since the beginning of March, internally non cni we have occasional connectivity issues, and slow latency, but nothing has been threatening the CNI any more than any other day.
still working IT guy,
though going back to finance / database dba / regulatory reporting support guy at work
|
Thank you very much. That was very informative. I did not retire from APS, I was a consultant with them for a while. I was working for them when 911 happened. I worked on several infrastructure related projects including some database projects for Palo Verde. One of the projects I was assigned was a project to upgrade substation communications to have redundant communications paths. This was to protect against potential physical attacks, and my understanding was they were doing it as a result of Congressional mandate to all electrical producers. I can't really say much more about it, since I was a contractor with confidentiality requirements.
Even back then there were multiple grids - yes - but, are you saying there are redundant national grids now? Because that was discussed when I was there, but was thought to be too expensive to be practical? The proposal that was gaining favor was distributed generation. But, the technology for that was not practical at the time.
And yes, I am certain there have been a LOT of improvement since then - that was 20 years ago, a few things have changed - LOL!
I am glad to hear we are taking it more seriously now compared to then.
I assume you read the CISA alert I linked to, and understand it was sent out to companies to alert them to a new cyber attack software that has been detected and to give them information on how to identify if they had been attacked and how to deal with it. It does not say we have been attacked, it says the software has been identified as having been "tested" against several locations.
Anyway, thank you again for bringing us more up to date than my out dated experience.
|