I think you may want to use a better process for your critical thinking, spaghetti won’t cut it.

BTW, that is an engineering website providing that article’s information.

Just getting tired of playing whack-a-mole.

Then don’t, there’s a lot of critical information out there and it can be overwhelming for some. People can pace their research.

Unfounded criticism is not the same as critical information. You misinterpreted your Norway article and you put too much (any) weight on an article that is pure speculation. You've heard from people who actually drive EVs but discard their experience in favor of rumors. It's important to be able to recognize the difference between honest research and confirmation bias.

Do you ever think perhaps EVS are not going to save this climate?

You totally refute any information that doesn’t align with your philosophies, they are all wrong and your baseless sentiments are right.

From the mouth of a family relation, she does not like her EV, particularly in a cold climate, but tells everyone it was a great decision. That’s called ego, not science.

BTW, I have not discounted hybrids but I would imagine they wouldn’t provide enough wealth for the investors.