EV Solves Range Problem EV Solves Range Problem - Page 5 - Talk of The Villages Florida

EV Solves Range Problem

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #61  
Old 11-20-2023, 06:35 PM
Eclas Eclas is offline
Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 57
Thanks: 46
Thanked 54 Times in 24 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by airstreamingypsy View Post
For those who think there is no global warming....

Earth briefly passed a feared global warming milestone.

Average global temperatures were more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial times for the first time on Friday, data shows.

What it means: The climate is moving into uncharted territory after months of record warmth. A longer-term breach of this benchmark could have severe consequences.

I didn't know until reading this thread, that anyone still thinks GW is a hoax, I thought the debate was the cause, not the existence.
Global warming is not a hoax however man made global warming is total BS.
  #62  
Old 11-20-2023, 09:28 PM
dhdallas's Avatar
dhdallas dhdallas is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 480
Thanks: 54
Thanked 1,205 Times in 266 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtdjed View Post
I had a dream that there will be an Electric Vehicle that solves the range of miles problem, lack of charging stations, time of charging etc. The truck will be scheduled for 2025 intro. It will get about 700 miles range without a need for stopping.

It will have its own generator to keep the battery charged. The generator is to be called a milage extender. Of course, generators require power to work. The uniqueness of his concept is that a readily available fuel, gasoline, will be used. It is planned that a small tank of gas will be stored on the vehicle. (Perhaps 27 Gal).

Wouldn't it be great if dreams like this could become reality? Close down the oil fields, no more global warning.

Alas, only a dream. Starts to sound like a complicated hybrid. Hmmm!
Nobody is forcing you to buy an EV so why do you and so many others hate them and feel compelled to actively protest against them? Right now an EV is perfect as a second car for errands and short work commutes where you don't need to worry about available commercial charge stations. They are not yet ready for long road trips to to range limitations and lack of charging infrastructure but that will change eventually. You guys seem to hate anything that is positive for the environment. Fortunately your generation will be dead soon and but your children will inherit the polluted dying planet you created.

One last point: All of our problems with terrorists, wars and the Middle East are caused by our interference in Middle Eastern affairs due to our need for oil. Eliminate the need for oil and thus eliminate our presence in the region and the problems related to the Middle East will be a thing of the past.
  #63  
Old 11-20-2023, 09:38 PM
JMintzer's Avatar
JMintzer JMintzer is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Where Eagles Dare to Soar...
Posts: 11,959
Thanks: 486
Thanked 8,982 Times in 4,718 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
I did that once earlier this year for one of these threads. The 97% (or was it 99%) is accurate. Of those papers that took a stand on climate change, 97% agreed that climate change was real and that man’s actions are adding to it.

Certainly, there are biologists (scientists) who have no opinion on climate change. They are neither part of the 97% nor the 3%. There are also climate scientists who have not taken a stand or have no opinion on the issue. They are neither part of the 97% nor the 3%. But according to the study, of those climate scientists expressing an opinion in published papers, 97% supported the idea that man was contributing to climate change.
Incorrect...

"This public discussion was started by Oreskes’ brief 2004 article, which included an analysis of 928 papers containing the keywords “global climate change.” The article says “none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position” of anthropogenic global warming. Although this article makes no claim to a specific number, it is routinely described as indicating 100% agreement and used as support for the 97% figure."

See the rest of the article here...

Fact Checking The Claim Of 97% Consensus On Anthropogenic Climate Change
__________________
Most things I worry about
Never happen anyway...

-Tom Petty
  #64  
Old 11-20-2023, 09:42 PM
JMintzer's Avatar
JMintzer JMintzer is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Where Eagles Dare to Soar...
Posts: 11,959
Thanks: 486
Thanked 8,982 Times in 4,718 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhdallas View Post
Nobody is forcing you to buy an EV so why do you and so many others hate them and feel compelled to actively protest against them? Right now an EV is perfect as a second car for errands and short work commutes where you don't need to worry about available commercial charge stations. They are not yet ready for long road trips to to range limitations and lack of charging infrastructure but that will change eventually. You guys seem to hate anything that is positive for the environment. Fortunately your generation will be dead soon and but your children will inherit the polluted dying planet you created.

One last point: All of our problems with terrorists, wars and the Middle East are caused by our interference in Middle Eastern affairs due to our need for oil. Eliminate the need for oil and thus eliminate our presence in the region and the problems related to the Middle East will be a thing of the past.
Certain states (and the Fed Gubmint) are most certainly mandating (forcing) you to buy EVs... (see California...)

EPA’s New Electric Vehicle Mandate: Too Far, Too Fast | NADA

"Will electric cars be mandatory in California?

Yes. California is only requiring that all NEW cars sold in 2035 and beyond are zero-emission vehicles which includes battery electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and fuel cell electric vehicles."

ca ev mandate - Google Search
__________________
Most things I worry about
Never happen anyway...

-Tom Petty
  #65  
Old 11-20-2023, 10:06 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,368
Thanks: 2,282
Thanked 7,721 Times in 3,030 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMintzer View Post
Incorrect...

"This public discussion was started by Oreskes’ brief 2004 article, which included an analysis of 928 papers containing the keywords “global climate change.” The article says “none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position” of anthropogenic global warming. Although this article makes no claim to a specific number, it is routinely described as indicating 100% agreement and used as support for the 97% figure."

See the rest of the article here...

Fact Checking The Claim Of 97% Consensus On Anthropogenic Climate Change
From the article you linked:
Cook is careful to describe his 2013 study results as being based on “climate experts.” Political figures and the popular press are not so careful. President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have repeatedly characterized it as 97% of scientists. Kerry has gone so far as to say that “97 percent of peer-reviewed climate studies confirm that climate change is happening and that human activity is largely responsible.” This is patently wrong, since the Cook study and others showed that the majority of papers take no position. One does not expect nuance in political speeches, and the authors of scientific papers cannot be held responsible for the statements of politicians and the media.

Given these results, it is clear that support among scientists for human-caused climate change is below 97%. Most studies including specialties other than climatologists find support in the range of 80% to 90%. The 97% consensus of scientists, when used without limitation to climate scientists, is false.
Which is what I wrote.

The author then goes on to say he disagrees with the methodology of the Cook study. I'm sure Cook and others disagree with his disagreement.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough

Last edited by Bill14564; 11-21-2023 at 06:44 AM.
  #66  
Old 11-21-2023, 12:42 AM
Escape Artist Escape Artist is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 400
Thanks: 164
Thanked 362 Times in 164 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtdjed View Post
I had a dream that there will be an Electric Vehicle that solves the range of miles problem, lack of charging stations, time of charging etc. The truck will be scheduled for 2025 intro. It will get about 700 miles range without a need for stopping.

It will have its own generator to keep the battery charged. The generator is to be called a milage extender. Of course, generators require power to work. The uniqueness of his concept is that a readily available fuel, gasoline, will be used. It is planned that a small tank of gas will be stored on the vehicle. (Perhaps 27 Gal).

Wouldn't it be great if dreams like this could become reality? Close down the oil fields, no more global warning.

Alas, only a dream. Starts to sound like a complicated hybrid. Hmmm!
It already exists, it’s called a hybrid like a Prius. It’s a good common sense solution and compromise.
  #67  
Old 11-21-2023, 04:35 AM
DonnaNi4os DonnaNi4os is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 676
Thanks: 227
Thanked 362 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Hybrids sound like the best alternative for what is available now. I just can’t wrap my head around an all electric vehicle. Don’t tell my daughter. She drives a Polestar and works on their marketing.
  #68  
Old 11-21-2023, 05:39 AM
Harold.wiser Harold.wiser is offline
Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 73
Thanks: 13
Thanked 90 Times in 39 Posts
Default

It's hard to believe the OP was serious. If the oil fields are shut down, where does his "small" 27 gallon tank of gas come from?
Also, this dream is exactly how train locomotives work now.
Keep dreaming and maybe you can invent a phone that accesses the internet and takes pictures 😅
  #69  
Old 11-21-2023, 06:35 AM
PjLyness1965 PjLyness1965 is offline
Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 37
Thanks: 82
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhdallas View Post
Nobody is forcing you to buy an EV so why do you and so many others hate them and feel compelled to actively protest against them? Right now an EV is perfect as a second car for errands and short work commutes where you don't need to worry about available commercial charge stations. They are not yet ready for long road trips to to range limitations and lack of charging infrastructure but that will change eventually. You guys seem to hate anything that is positive for the environment. Fortunately your generation will be dead soon and but your children will inherit the polluted dying planet you created.

One last point: All of our problems with terrorists, wars and the Middle East are caused by our interference in Middle Eastern affairs due to our need for oil. Eliminate the need for oil and thus eliminate our presence in the region and the problems related to the Middle East will be a thing of the past.
According to Biden administration all vehicles will be electric by 2035. So yes, we are in fact being forced to buy EV’s.
  #70  
Old 11-21-2023, 06:37 AM
biker1 biker1 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,665
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1,251 Times in 719 Posts
Default

The all electric Tesla Model Y is the best selling car in the US and the world.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonnaNi4os View Post
Hybrids sound like the best alternative for what is available now. I just can’t wrap my head around an all electric vehicle. Don’t tell my daughter. She drives a Polestar and works on their marketing.
  #71  
Old 11-21-2023, 06:39 AM
biker1 biker1 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,665
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1,251 Times in 719 Posts
Default

Not true. Gasoline cars will be around for probably the next 30 years. You will see the percentage of new cars that are gasoline drop off to near zero but used gasoline cars will be around for some time. The Government may continue to provide incentives to buy an electric car, in much the same way that they provide incentives to buy a house.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PjLyness1965 View Post
According to Biden administration all vehicles will be electric by 2035. So yes, we are in fact being forced to buy EV’s.

Last edited by biker1; 11-21-2023 at 06:59 AM.
  #72  
Old 11-21-2023, 06:46 AM
Kstastny Kstastny is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 3
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Shut down oil fields?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtdjed View Post
I had a dream that there will be an Electric Vehicle that solves the range of miles problem, lack of charging stations, time of charging etc. The truck will be scheduled for 2025 intro. It will get about 700 miles range without a need for stopping.

It will have its own generator to keep the battery charged. The generator is to be called a milage extender. Of course, generators require power to work. The uniqueness of his concept is that a readily available fuel, gasoline, will be used. It is planned that a small tank of gas will be stored on the vehicle. (Perhaps 27 Gal).

Wouldn't it be great if dreams like this could become reality? Close down the oil fields, no more global warning.

Alas, only a dream. Starts to sound like a complicated hybrid. Hmmm!
So you believe oil is only for gasoline? Look around at all the items you use that is petroleum based.

Last edited by Kstastny; 11-21-2023 at 07:09 AM.
  #73  
Old 11-21-2023, 07:04 AM
Keefelane66 Keefelane66 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 1,855
Thanks: 930
Thanked 2,101 Times in 808 Posts
Default

There is no Fereral mandate or Congress passed Bill to force the consumer to buy EV.
“ Federal Sustainability Plan requires federal agencies to transition the largest fleet in the world to all electric by acquiring 100 percent light-duty ZEVs annually by 2027 and acquiring 100 percent medium- and heavy-duty ZEVs annually by 2035.”

Last edited by Keefelane66; 11-21-2023 at 07:51 AM.
  #74  
Old 11-21-2023, 07:07 AM
huge-pigeons huge-pigeons is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 222
Thanks: 2
Thanked 376 Times in 122 Posts
Default

EV’s will take many decades to be a viable alternative to gas vehicles. A relative works for a company that has EV trucks for hauling, they need double the amount of vehicles to do what a diesel truck can do. Battery life and towing capacity are the main issues, plus you just can’t pull over and do a quick charge while a hired driver is sitting around for many hours unproductive while getting paid
  #75  
Old 11-21-2023, 07:14 AM
defrey12 defrey12 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 402
Thanks: 151
Thanked 337 Times in 180 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by metalic View Post
Thank you for clarifying

I was listening to the 97% of scientists who accept climate change as fact, rather than the 3% in the pay of Big Oil - silly old me!

Looking forward to your future revelation that smoking is good for you
Yes, they accept climate change as a fact. And it is. BUT NOT for the reasons YOU and yours profess.
__________________
DEF
Closed Thread

Tags
range, solves, charging, miles, vehicle


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.