Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Non Villages Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/)
-   -   Florida Amendment 1 2018 (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/florida-amendment-1-2018-a-275384/)

manaboutown 10-24-2018 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix (Post 1592898)
I would love to have a one-on-one conversation with the genius who decided that the issues of vaping and off-shore drilling could be bundled into one inclusive item.

This practice is common in politics.

Rider (legislation - Wikipedia)

Bucco 10-24-2018 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 1592909)

Great you use Orwell quotes on your posts...nice.....two of my favorites...

"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act."

And....

"We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it."

graciegirl 10-24-2018 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 1592909)

Thank you. That also adds insite.

mtdjed 10-25-2018 08:50 AM

As the original poster for this topic, I appreciate the comments.

mtdjed 10-25-2018 09:21 AM

My summary of what I have read from posts is that amendment 1 incrementally increases the homestead exemption up to $75,000 from $50,000. The increase starts at a home valued at $100,000 and stops at $125,000.

Amendment 2 affects non homestead properties only. Currently, they are protected from annual increases exceeding 10% . A yes vote would keep protection at 10% while a no vote eliminates protection.


So assuming that our local government expenses are necessary, the additional exemption on homestead properties will reduce needed revenue at current tax millage rates and will require tax increases on some properties. Amendment 2 clears the path to unlimited tax increases on non homestead properties. (isn't the 10% limit bad enough).


Another way to get the added revenues to increase the millage rate on homestead eligible properties. That would cause taxes to increase on all homes assessed at less than $100,000. I am a conservative but it seems to me that would be wrong to increase the tax on those least able to afford it so I can get a decrease. This is caused by the stepping stone practice on the Homestead exemptions. Why wasn't the new exemption initiated at a lower evaluation? ie $75,000 to $100,000. I understand that would be even more revenue lost but it illustrates the possible lack of equity on this amendment.


Easy to say yes for a benefit that favors me. Easy to say yes to pass the higher taxes to someone else.


Just another perspective.

perrjojo 10-25-2018 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix (Post 1592895)
Many of these amendments are already in state law and don't need to be in the constitution.

That was exactly my thought.

Rapscallion St Croix 10-25-2018 10:30 AM

I am going with straight "NO" votes. There is too much hanky panky mumbo jumbo special interest smoke and mirror giberishness involved.

Madelaine Amee 10-25-2018 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 1592909)

Thanks Bogie, the more explanation the better. I have to admit that I gave up on one or two of the amendments and followed the dictates of the LofWV.

rustyp 10-26-2018 06:01 AM

[QUOTE=mtdjed;1593052]My summary of what I have read from posts is that amendment 1 incrementally increases the homestead exemption up to $75,000 from $50,000. The increase starts at a home valued at $100,000 and stops at $125,000.

I think the way this works is a resident will get the full $25000 exemption for all houses over $125000. The $100K to $125K range is how it phases in. Example if your house is assessed at $112500 (halfway in the range) the exemption would be half of the $25000 or $12500. Not meant to be only houses within the range.

rustyp 10-26-2018 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix (Post 1593071)
I am going with straight "NO" votes. There is too much hanky panky mumbo jumbo special interest smoke and mirror giberishness involved.

You are making a good point. This is the state constitution. Why are there so many items that are essentially laws or regulations. One of the items on the ballot is to eliminate dog racing. Is there an amendment in the constitution now that allows dog racing ? If it is in the constitution I have to ask myself why ? Why is is so important as to be in the constitution Vs being a state law? FYI I believe the Florida constitution already has 129 amendments. For reference the US constitution has 27 amendments.

blyarbrough 10-26-2018 07:22 AM

Ok...I am convinced that amendment 1 in good for most of Florida's people BUT have you ready Amendment 4.......giving Felonds their right to vote back??


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.