![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
The implication (from the full article) was towards pilot suicide, not error, if I am reading it correctly.
|
Quote:
In 2018 there was a Boeing/FAA Advisory, to check the operation of the locking mechanism on the Fuel Switches. It was advisory in nature, not a requirement. Air India never checked the switches. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is the best (and only) answer... TALONIP--"How's the ride?" |
Quote:
|
The fuel control switches are controlled 100% by the pilots. The Boeing design philosophy has always been "pilot first", which means, even on the 787, we ultimately control what happens. I was discussing the fuel control switches on a flight yesterday, there is no way both accidentally moved to the cutoff position. Even with a complete electrical failure, the switches still function as they should and the engines will continue to run. The airplane has 4 (6 if you count the APU) Generators, battery and the RAT.
Also... for those believing the controls were electronically taken over by a passenger 🤦You can't "hack" an airplane and take control of its systems... This isn't Hollywood. |
Maybe the pilot shut off the both fuel switches, 1 second apart, thinking he was retracting the landing gears :)
|
A commercial pilot wouldn’t recognize a cut off switch?? We are not talking about an aging Hollywood star trying to fly his own plane.
|
Quote:
Suicide by pilot - Wikipedia Suicide by pilot - Wikipedia There seem to be more though. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Further update:
‘A black-box recording of dialogue between the flight’s two pilots indicates it was the captain who turned off switches that controlled fuel flowing to the plane’s two engines, according to people familiar with U.S. officials’ early assessment of evidence uncovered in the crash investigation. The first officer who was flying the Boeing 787 Dreamliner asked the more-experienced captain why he moved the switches to the “cutoff” position after it climbed off the runway, these people said. The first officer expressed surprise and then panicked, these people said, while the captain seemed to remain calm. A preliminary report of the probe released last week summarized the exchange but didn’t identify which pilot said what. The report, by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, said one pilot asked the other why he moved the switches, while the other denied doing so.’ WSJ July16/25 Wow! |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
The cut off switches look to me to the left of the flap selector - but I have never flown an 787.
The Air India captain has been treated for depression following the death of his mother in 2022. He was cleared to fly again. He was 56 years old with 15,000 hours of flight under his belt. He turned off both fuel switches 3 seconds after take-off. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
look at post#51 for photo of switch locations and actual photo of the recovered (burnt) switch panel from crashed plane
|
Quote:
At the exact moment when the non-flying pilot would move to retract the landing gear, both fuel cutoff switches were toggled one second apart. The landing gear switch was never toggled. Hmmm. This is data analysis...Speculation is just speculation. |
This video shows how the fuel switches are toggled. Certainly not something that can happen by accident.
https://fb.watch/AW2Gy_8KS6/?fs=e |
Quote:
Why did it take 10 seconds to switch back to run? Speculation: Perhaps noting that fuel supply was in a cutoff state even though the switches were in the run state, one of the pilots toggled the physical switches to cutoff, waited 10 seconds, then toggled them back to run. More analysis of the recorders is needed to determine exactly what happened. |
I asked AI if there is any possibility that software could turn the fuel cut-off switches on or off.
AI Overview: India orders airlines to check fuel switches on Boeing jets No, the fuel cut-off switches (CHT/IFF) on a Boeing 787 are not designed to be controlled by software; they are manually operated by the pilots. While the 787 has sophisticated automation systems, the fuel control switches are physically separate and require a pilot's action to move them between "run" and "cutoff" positions. My speculation: What could also explain what happened is that the captain switches off both fuel switches. The pilot, flying the plane, is busy with maneuvers for taking off but notices and panics and asks, Why? The captain calmly answers that he didn’t. Notice, the captain has been told that the cutoff switches are off AND he stays calm. The pilot flying the plane in his panic does not change the flaps or retract the landing gear which we see in the video. The captain is in a position to take control, but does nothing. The pilot flying the plane, quickly turns back the fuel switches, but the damage has been done. My guess is that Captain Sumeet Sabharwal has research this, ran a simulation on what happens and how soon after fuel is cut off, so he knew what was going to happen. |
The pilot turned off the fuel to the engines. Everything is on the voice recorder in the cockpit. Mass murder by pilot will soon be released to the press.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No such thing. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
AI Overview Cessna 150 vs 152 - Thrust Flight The Cessna 150 is a two-seat, tricycle-gear general aviation airplane, popular for flight training, touring, and personal use. It was first introduced in 1959 and was known for its simplicity and forgiving flight characteristics. The Cessna 150 was produced until 1977, with over 23,000 aircraft manufactured. It was later succeeded by the Cessna 152. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
& I know about Cessna 150-152's, I landed one on the only FAA recognized Ice runway in the USA and have a few hours in a 150 Aerobat. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think the real issue might be, is that it is very hard for a pilot or anyone to accept, that after all the hours of training, and years of indoctrination of how you are responsible for all on board - that is why the manual over-ride - that a captain, a senior pilot, in this case over 200 people looked up to, to protect - would take them to their death.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
"I've never flown an airplane, but I've read news reports and know how to analyze flight data recorder". Common sense and reasoning? 2 ATP rated professional pilots have commented on the thread and offered professional opinions that contradict the amateur opinions being expressed. A professional aircraft safety investigator has been quoted as saying there's no evidence this was a "suicide" crash ... but that doesn't seem to deter the rampant speculation. Only on TOTV. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.