It's ridiculous that the Commonwealth of MA spent somewhere around $4,000,000 and Read spent even more ... when they both could have come right here to TOTV and learned the real facts.

Waste of time and money.

Karen Read is a insanely jealous DRUNK. Her relationship with John was coming to an end. Evidence shows they had been fighting for over a month because he hugged a family friend at a hotel lobby. On the night in question, she has 9 double shots, on video and receipts. She was driving back to after hour get together. They pulled to front of house and she slowly pulled to far left of property line, arguing as they had done that day according to texts. Evidence of her black box and GPS from Johns phone shows John exited her car , air bag disengaged. She went forward 34', slammed it in reverse 84' . She clipped john , he was thrown 10' up the lawn. She took off with A broken taillight, Microscopic taillight shards were later found by forensic specialists. She called him 54 times started minutes after hitting him. Every call pinged at flagpole area, his phone, found under him, thermostat continues to go 20 degrees lower until after he was found.
She calls to john were angry ,profanity F bomb screaming. She made several calls to her parents at 1am, last text was "John's dead" long be for he was found.
She then calls two of John friends and said she left him at the bar, Jen said ,"no I saw you outside my sisters house. Then she told Kerry "john got hit by a plow"
The 3 went in Kerry car to look for John. Karen insisted on returning to Fairview. When they approach the far left property line, in pitch dark, howling blizzard, Karen started screaming and kicking the door to get out. She ran to a large figure buried in 6 inches of snow which was John. Jen called 911 and Jen and Kerry did CPR until ambulance arrived.

Karen's lawyer said at her arraignment that it was an "unintentional accident" .
Next came the trial in "social media" by bloggers in for the clicks. Karen was the instigator along with blogger to harrass and Intimate witnesses and even their children.
Alan Jackson, big time LA lawyer, Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacy, and Phil Spector joined the defence.
Blame the police, the instigation and harrass the witnesses. Put out FALSE information and accuse innocent people.
FBI did thorough investigation and found only Karen responsible for Johns death. NO one else.

ALL the Alberts and McCabes attended the funeral.

Colin Albert left the house at 12:10, confirmed by his phone text and GPS. Also by his cousin that picked him up,her phone and text. Karen left the bar video surveillance at 12:12 arriving at house at 12:24.

That didn't stop bloggers from spuing face information. Defense never call Steve Scanlon and he denied he gave Yannetti that information, however Yannetti leaked it to the blogger and Toilet boy ran with it.
Colin was a 17 yr ,140# kid. John was a well built 6'1" 216# .
The motive Yannetti gave was that Colin crossed johns lawn when he was 10.
There were 9 people in the house at 12:24, two were 23 yr girls, one a nurse unrelated. The were driven home by the McCabes. Do you think that those girls parents would tell then to lie to the police, lie to a federal grand jury and lie under oath in court??? And be accessory to murder.??

4 medical examiners testified john was not in a physical altercation. Defense claimed superficial abrations, stated by medical examiners were dog bites. There wasNO dog DNA, NO lower teeth marks and not one dog HAIRS.

Taillight pieces were found at the scene buried under plow snowbank, 3 feet before SUV arrived at heated police garage. It was in possession of her parents who removed it from johns house.
Earlier at8:2am police did a wellness check on children and dash cam shows Karen SUV with broken taillight. Driveway, SUV and house covered with foot of snow. No footprints or tire marks . Nobody was near that property. NOBODY planted anything. Also found at the scene was John sneaker , hat and glass, straw. He is on video leaving bar with glass straw in hand. KAREN killed John and left him to die in the Blizzard.

The FBI did a thorough investigation and only Karen was responsible. There was no "sabotage" of sally port videos. They are motion detection, no missing footage. All the people in the house were interviewed. You are quoting a dirty blogger that has 18 felony charges pending trial.

Defense took one frame but if you see where she puts the brake on you can see the broken taillight compared to the left taillight, its clearly missing. Also, the 820 am wellness check on children. Twilight pieces were found by forensic SERT team, with police watching and news crew filming.
Just the fact that you use the word McAlberts, shows you get your false information from Turdboy, who has 18 felony charges pending his trial. Karen killed john and left him to die in the Blizzard. First she said she left him at the bar,left a message "nobody knows where the F you are. then she said a plow must have hit him then her lawyer said at her arraignment a nd to the press, " it was an uintentional accident ". Then it was Colin. Allie NEVER said John was in the house. She picked up Colin at 12:10 confirmed by phone a d GPS. Karen arrived outside at 12:24 confirmed by GPS a d phone. Her black box shows John exited her car, air bag disengaged, and she pulled forward 34', slammed it in reverse and john dies in 17 seconds. His phone never moved again until after he was found hours later. She called him 54 times during those hours and his phone pinged every time at flagpole area.

You could probably say it another 50 times and the fact remains, the 12 jurors who were tasked with separating fact & truth from nonsense, disagree with you ... as does the Judge, who refused to issue a directed verdict and opted to rely on 12 impartial jurors to decide.

I wish it was. She has a civil suit to contend with. Then It will be imperative that she proves herself innocent. Fortunately based on jury feedback her lawyers can convincingly meet that standard.

NO. The burden of proof in the Civil action, is firmly in the hands of the Plaintiff. Karen Read doesn't have to prove or disprove, anything.

In response to your snarky comment, I will simply say that I was inclined to assume she was guilty. I normally don't get sucked in to watching trials on TV(last one was OJ) but this case had so many intriguing elements to it that I got sucked in.

After reading and watching
I don’t think she killed him. I think there was a fight at the home and he most likely left but fell or passed out in the snow. How else can one explain the dog bites and scratches on his arm. The swollen eyes and blunt force trauma to the back of his head.
I don’t think it was meant to be a frame job. I don’t think the people I the house knew he was laying in the snow until Karen called and told them he was missing.

Except his body was beat up. Had dog bites all over his arm, blunt force hit on the back of his head, and swollen eyes and beat up face. He would not have gotten those if had just passed out in the snow

I live in Boston. The Karen Read trial has dominated local news, for over a year. The 2nd Trial received wall-to-wall coverage and analysis, every day. Coverage didn't end until 8 pm, on most local TV stations.

12 reasonably intelligent, unbiased people, found her Not Guilty. She's been on trial twice.

It boggles my mind, that folks can come on here, re-hash selective facts and events that support their opinion and then proclaim Karen Read is a murderer.

Just for the record, we in Boston were bombarded with this. Experts up the ying yang. I have not seen a single "expert" opine that the jury screwed up or was wrong. As a matter of fact, I never heard even one expert, predict Read would be convicted. The facts clearly didn't warrant a finding of Guilty ... twice.

I did not intend to say that. But I believe that most of the evidence and research that her lawyers will need were discovered or revealed in the criminal case.