Deep Thinkers 6

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-31-2022, 11:20 AM
Rich Iwaszko Rich Iwaszko is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 295
Thanks: 1
Thanked 153 Times in 79 Posts
Default Deep Thinkers 6

Hi,
it's time to talk solar. It was touted in the early days of solar that large business's would cover store roofs with solar. It did not happen, it had to be financial, it didn't make dollars and sense. Solar Panels are very inefficient.......the best are only 15% efficient, hence so many panels.
The average savings from solar is from 50-150$ per month or lets say 1,200$ per year.
If the panes cost 15,000, could be low, the payback time is 12.5 years. This seems too long.
Now that their is a 30% tax credit, the sellers will raise the price at least 15%.
If you go with solar that has storage batteries the costs double and triple with more benefit, but, does it make and dollars and sense really. If you have solar and are paying nothing for electricity please weigh in on this. Please tell us what you paid for it as well.
let the sun shine in..........
  #2  
Old 08-31-2022, 11:50 AM
ThirdOfFive ThirdOfFive is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,797
Thanks: 746
Thanked 4,660 Times in 1,529 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Iwaszko View Post
Hi,
it's time to talk solar. It was touted in the early days of solar that large business's would cover store roofs with solar. It did not happen, it had to be financial, it didn't make dollars and sense. Solar Panels are very inefficient.......the best are only 15% efficient, hence so many panels.
The average savings from solar is from 50-150$ per month or lets say 1,200$ per year.
If the panes cost 15,000, could be low, the payback time is 12.5 years. This seems too long.
Now that their is a 30% tax credit, the sellers will raise the price at least 15%.
If you go with solar that has storage batteries the costs double and triple with more benefit, but, does it make and dollars and sense really. If you have solar and are paying nothing for electricity please weigh in on this. Please tell us what you paid for it as well.
let the sun shine in..........
I have no problem with solar power, or wind power either (which when you come down to it, is a form of solar power anyway). The more electricity we can generate without burning fossil or other kinds of fuels, the better off we all are.

The problem is that it is not consistent. Batteries can store only so much for only so long, and Mother Nature always has the last word on setting the conditions. Solar power in northern climes is problematic to say the least especially in winter when days are short and nights are loooooong...and even during the day, odds are it will be cloudy. Same for wind power, which it at it's most plentiful in fall and spring--when the need for it is least.

Non-fossil fuel - generated electrical power will be feasible when it can compete with fossil fuel or nuclear-powered generating plants. Until then, it is a great supplement but that is all.
  #3  
Old 08-31-2022, 12:29 PM
Davonu Davonu is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 466
Thanks: 52
Thanked 611 Times in 190 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThirdOfFive View Post
…The more electricity we can generate without burning fossil or other kinds of fuels, the better off we all are...
Maybe someday. But right now that is a gross oversimplification.
  #4  
Old 08-31-2022, 01:39 PM
tophcfa's Avatar
tophcfa tophcfa is online now
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Posts: 6,056
Thanks: 2,856
Thanked 9,035 Times in 2,730 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Iwaszko View Post
Hi,
it's time to talk solar. It was touted in the early days of solar that large business's would cover store roofs with solar. It did not happen, it had to be financial, it didn't make dollars and sense. Solar Panels are very inefficient.......the best are only 15% efficient, hence so many panels.
The average savings from solar is from 50-150$ per month or lets say 1,200$ per year.
If the panes cost 15,000, could be low, the payback time is 12.5 years. This seems too long.
Now that their is a 30% tax credit, the sellers will raise the price at least 15%.
If you go with solar that has storage batteries the costs double and triple with more benefit, but, does it make and dollars and sense really. If you have solar and are paying nothing for electricity please weigh in on this. Please tell us what you paid for it as well.
let the sun shine in..........
All for any reliable form of low carbon energy source that can stand on its own economics without being subsidized by taxpayers.
  #5  
Old 09-01-2022, 07:51 AM
dtennent dtennent is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 367
Thanks: 48
Thanked 371 Times in 164 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tophcfa View Post
All for any reliable form of low carbon energy source that can stand on its own economics without being subsidized by taxpayers.
Let’s give all energy sources the same tax breaks/subsidies. Oil investors get intangible drilling costs and tangible drilling costs as deductions. In addition, small producers get a deletion allowance. Should level the playing field a bit.

Google “What are the tax breaks for oil and gas”. Investopedia is the source for my info.
__________________
“There is no such thing as a normal period of history. Normality is a fiction of economic textbooks.”

— Joan Robinson, “Contributions to Modern Economics” (1978)
  #6  
Old 09-02-2022, 07:40 AM
Bay Kid's Avatar
Bay Kid Bay Kid is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: The Villages and the Northern Neck on the Chesapeake Bay, VA.
Posts: 5,441
Thanks: 1,633
Thanked 3,107 Times in 1,339 Posts
Default

Buy enough electric company stock and the dividends will pay your electric bill. Easy, clean and your home looks better.
Closed Thread

Tags
solar, sense, 15%, dollars, panels


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.