Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#31
|
||
|
||
Assuredly Kate knows of which she speaks.
So do all the rest who have traveled by air recently. There really isn't a problem that I can perceive. I would do anything to make air travel safer. I have no problem with whatever it takes to keep people from getting on airplanes carrying dangerous items. Sometimes people who are not related to you have to touch your body; Doctors, nurses, technicians,hair dressers, people who fit prostheses, people in airports. You would know if someone is feeling you up. Not everyone is sex crazed. Although my overweight, older, wrinkled body is probably a huge temptation. Last edited by graciegirl; 03-04-2011 at 06:19 AM. |
|
#32
|
||
|
||
Quote:
I would prefer real safety protocols instead of all the feel good theatre that the pro TSA'ers have swallowed whole. In the meantime we'll see what, if anything, comes out of the Bill before the New Hampshire Assembly that, you may be surprised, was not written by me, but by elected lawmakers by the voters of New Hampshire. Really, all I did was report the story.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759) |
#33
|
||
|
||
Thank you for posting this info...
Quote:
My biggest concern with these invasive scans/pat downs is that there are plans to extend these measures, in the near future, to rail service. At that point, are all the folks that say "oh, but flying is a choice...blah, blah, blah..." going to say once again that using the rail system is a choice? Where does the invasion into our rights to be "innocent until proven guilty" end?
__________________
Kim & Jim N. Reading, MA; Hampstead, NH; last stop SummerChase Cottages,TV! |
#34
|
||
|
||
Quote:
|
#35
|
||
|
||
From what I have read on these posts, is that no one personally has had "invasive" pat downs with groping of private areas - as described on Fox News (I had to put that in for Richie). A couple have had the full body scans and have no problem with it. This seems to be a total non-issue here.
Once again, just a politician puffering to make a point and contributing to the greenhouse gas problem when they open their mouth. Last edited by Tbugs; 03-04-2011 at 11:33 AM. |
#36
|
||
|
||
Quote:
Flying is a choice, rail is a choice, even driving is a choice. All these modes of travel are definitely a choice!!! I don't know about you, but I've yet to see anyone being forced at gun point or by any other means to use those first two modes of transportation! The only real non-choice that is apparant here is our RIGHT to remain DEAD once killed by a terrorist getting by inadequate security, blah, blah, blah...! Heaven knows that there's plenty of room for security proceedures to be improved in this country, but until our current government leaders wakes up and improves those proceedures, I'll opt to put my junk out there at non-violent risk instead of my life at REAL risk! And if those leaders don't wake up... then let's replace them with leaders who will!
__________________
ARE VILLAGERS OLD OR ARE THEY RECYCLED TEENAGERS At my age rolling out of bed in the morning is easy. Getting up off the floor is another story. "SMILE... TOMORROW MAY BE EVEN WORSE!"
|
#37
|
||
|
||
Quote:
X-cellent! |
#38
|
||
|
||
I'll only leave you with my TOTV signature which one of the most insightful of our founding fathers articulated in his usual brilliant way. He had a true American spirit.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759) |
#39
|
||
|
||
Mr Franklins words are still wise. Context is important. Living in the Villages we have agreed to give up discharging firearms in our yard, speeding on public roads, driving an auto without insurance and much much more. We need to vigorously test every relinqueshment of rights against it effectiveness in protecting our physical existence. Obviously we will differ in opinion on many issues. Democracy is messy but should produce the greatest good for the largest number of persons without undue disadvantage to the minority. As for the TSA issues, we the public do not know many of the circumstances that have caused implication of what seem to be silly procedures. So, the debate goes on..
|
#40
|
||
|
||
Richie - I love your quote.... But many also used this in reference to the Patriot Act.
I agree we need to stay ahead of the bad guys... and that small amounts of liquid or shoes may be knee jerk reactions.... But wouldn't we all fee stupid if another shoe bomber was allowed to board wearing shoes with explosives because we didn't check? Well, not all of us, of course.... as some would feel nothing at all - they would be those that died. Flying as often as I do, I'm thankful that we are using technology to keep the air safe. And just, in terms of full disclosure, no products or services that I sell are used in any airport scanning devices.
__________________
Holyoke, Mass; East Granby, Monroe, Madison and Branford, Conn; Port Clyde, Maine; North Myrtle Beach, SC; The Village of Bonita (April 2009 - ) |
#41
|
||
|
||
Now Texas joins the fight with a Bill co-sponsered by Rep. David Simpson with a bipartisan group of 18 Texas lawmakers. The Bill would make it a civil penalty for anyone installing or operating whole body imaging machines in airports. The penalty could be $1000 a day.
The bill is supported by the Travis County Republican Party, the Travis County Libertarian Party and, surprisingly to me, the liberal ACLU chapter in Texas. Also on board is the Texans for Accountable Government which campaigned for a resolution against the scanners in the city of Austin If it becomes law Texas joins New Hampshire and N.J. with bills challenging these measures. http://www.lonestarreport.org/Blog/t...nner-bill.aspx
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759) |
#42
|
||
|
||
Not surprising to me at all... the ACLU has opposed these measures from day 1. The administrations (both Dem and Rep) have said that we need to up our security game - even if some freedoms are lost.
__________________
Holyoke, Mass; East Granby, Monroe, Madison and Branford, Conn; Port Clyde, Maine; North Myrtle Beach, SC; The Village of Bonita (April 2009 - ) |
#43
|
||
|
||
No chance to become laws
Political Puffery
|
#44
|
||
|
||
Agree - wake me up when they become law. Until then - "assume the position" |
#45
|
||
|
||
Not everyone is as willing to give up their God given and Constitutionally protected freedoms in hopes of an elusive sense of security without at least a fight.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759) |
Closed Thread |
|
|