Originally Posted by blueash (Post 1008989)

I am not tricking anyone. I presented accurate information. I want to get people thinking about the hypocrisy in our legal system. We want our doctors to provide the safest most effective medications for each individual patient. We want our citizens to be productively employed. And then when a doctor and a patient find a medication that works and is legal in the state, the corporation with the consent of the courts fires him even though all sides agree that his medication did NOT impair him in any way. If you are outraged at an employer being able to fire you for using Prozac or Lyrica or Ambien then why should not that same outrage apply to legal use of marijuana?

It cannot be left to the courts because the courts simply apply the law unless the law is vague or unconstitutional. Change needs to come from the legislature rewriting the laws or the people amending the state constitution.
Brandon Coats' Case Could Change Everything

We need rational drug laws and this is yet another example of anti-drug madness.

Originally Posted by Chi-Town (Post 1008995)

You know Blueash I was also skeptical of your post, because it sounded like that bs post from before. But it is actually a real human interest story. I hope it works out well for Brandon Coats. If one had a loved one who was paralyzed in a car accident and suffered violent muscle spasms that were only alleviated by medical marijuana one would not be casting judgement. An interesting case to see how it unfolds.

Quadriplegic Man’s Pot Firing Case Heard By State Supreme Court « CBS Denver

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1009054)

ANYONE would agree with that. It is that isolated examples are brought up and make me very skeptical. If that is so, do not make it "over the counter" make it prescribed.

Next?

Originally Posted by blueash (Post 1008989)

I am not tricking anyone. I presented accurate information.

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1009049)

To all the folks in The Villages who smoke grass.

High.