buggyone |
07-31-2013 06:39 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by senior citizen
(Post 717138)
I "hear you" totally.........both of my grandmothers were widowed young.
My mom always told me that her mother would NOT take "relief" as they called welfare in those days.......she took in laundry instead, to support her three children when her young 37 year old husband died during the influenza epidemic. She was too proud to take any handouts.
My other grandmother was also widowed during the flu epidemic with 7 children to raise.......plus her two little brothers who had come from Italy when their own mother died.........my grandmother managed to raise the 9 children without relief.....again, too proud. The older two found work and helped support the family. Also, aunts and uncles helped out.
Also, as you mention.........churches helped families in need.
Back then, they no doubt lived a more humble existence compared to all the luxuries we are now surrounded by.
|
Those two grandmothers of yours lost their husbands in the flu epidemic. That was 1917 or so. Were there government agencies dedicated to helping the poor at that time? Social Security or food stamps were not around, I know.
My grandmother lost her husband in the flu epidemic in 1917 also and raised 6 children. They were Quakers so their church pitched in like an extended family and this was in Kansas where they were farmers.
I have heard many stories, though, of people back then losing the breadwinner and the family had to give their children away in order to survive.
No, those were not "the good old days". People did what they had to do to survive.
|