Thanks richielion

???????????????

Funny, but appropriate. Well, anyway, we know what we have. sometimes I get so tired of all the negative B.S. on the news. Maybe I'll live longer if I only read the Daily Sun. :)

This was a tragedy. And we know there are always two sides to every story. we will probably never know the truth.

Non-fact based conclusions
 

How can you possibly reach the conclusions that you have based on the publicly available information? Why not just wait until all the facts come out? E.g., if Zimmerman was injured, there will be medical reports to substantiate that fact. (Certainly the police report states that he was injured, but you seem to want to believe that the police officers, for some unexplained reason, would lie to protect a guy they didn't even know.)

My conclusion, George Zimmerman -Gun- Travon Martin No Gun. George alive, Travon dead.If it happened.....George being punched in the nose. Does that mean all the people in all the years where smacked in the nose, you have a license to shoot them.What I see is a hint of something else taking place by some of the posters.So this is my view.

What if head was being pounded on concrete by a mugger?
 

Why not wait before reaching conclusions?

What if Zimmerman was the victim of a mugger, who was pounding Zimmerman's head on the concrete in an attempt to kill him? I'm afraid that you are acting a lot like the professional agitator Al Sharpton and reaching conclusions not supported by the facts, but by your own agenda or prejudices. I'm not saying that your conclusion is wrong-- just way too premature.

If it is decided that it is a legitimate case of self-defense then nobody is going to sue anybody. One of the benefits of the Castle doctrine and the stand your ground law it protects the person from civil suit also.

Hope that doesn't ruin your day.

Advagado...Protect a guy they didn't even know? Be real, Zimmerman's daddy is a judge!

Father a judge = police coverup
 

I didn't know that. I guess that means that Zimmerman must be guilty?

This gives a little different picture of Zimmerman.
 

This is a forum for opinions. Which may change when more facts are revealed. Members like to chit-chat and speculate about current events.

Maybe you should ask travon martin if his head was being pounded also.I really think George Zimmerman drove around and walked around that complex as if he owned it.I think if I looked out a seen a white man following a black teenager i would be concerned.Think George got really cocky and this kid decked him. Not sure of head pounded in the ground more like the back of his head was on the ground.George was losing the fight and took out his piece and killed the teenager. Yes---Pure and Simple. And yes homeowners can be part of the sued.

That's exactly what Advogado was doing and I think he/she has just as much right to express their opinions as those who think and believe like many did back in the days of the wild west... hang now, ask questions later!

I also agree that Sharpton is a professional agitator. He, as well as Alton Maddox and C Vernon Mason, made their beds and earned their reputations back in 1987 when they supported Twana Brawley, no questions asked, when she falsely accused and ruined reputations of 6 individuals that included policemen and a New York prosecutor. The accusations were so disgusting that I won't even repeat them here. You can read the details at the link I provide below where you'll also find an alarming parallel scenario to what's happening today.

Tawana Brawley rape allegations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History repeated itself again in 2006 when Sharpton got involved with Crystal Gail Mangum who falsely accused 3 white players of the Duke LaCrosse team of rape, ruining the reputation those 3 men like happened in the Brawley case. Just click her name for details of that Sharpton gaffe!

You're absolutely right Skyguy. :mornincoffee: Note to Self - Have coffee before posting.

Have one for me too! :p

... oh, never mind. My wife just broght me one! :mornincoffee: