Originally Posted by JoMar (Post 1607544)

I don't think that is entirely right......the Post Office consistently shows they lose money and asks Congress to allow them to charge fees based on costs and to eliminate some services that cannot be competitive. Congress doesn't give it to them because it would hurt us consumers...yeah right. Congress continues to cover the deficit with our tax money, but the post office has been up front that they are losing money and will continue to do so.

Originally Posted by Jazuela (Post 1607566)

I think you're not understanding how shipping and mail service works, at all. The person who sent the package to you via USPS determines HOW it gets sent to you. It sounds like they sent it non-priority ground. Or possibly even book rate, which is slower. What happens is - the company sends the post office a request for a shipping label. This happens electronically. The label is printed at the company, and the post office now has notification that there's a pickup needed. Some time within the next 24 hours, the post office goes to the company *specifically* to pick up packages (this isn't drop-off, it's pickup). You would have received notification that shipping label was printed, the day before.

Then, the post office truck brings the package to his station. Then, his station sends it to the local regional distribution center. Then, the distribution center sends it to the distribution center that includes your state's distribution region in it. Then, that distribution center sends it to the distribution that is assigned to the area where your zip code is located. Then, that distribution center sends it to the post office assigned to your zip code. Then, that post office sorts the mail and sets your package into the bin that gets loaded onto your driver's truck. Then your driver delivers it.

This is how it works, whether it's the company two counties away, two states away, or the guy next door sending you a Christmas card in the mail. If it's book rate or non-priority ground, that is the process. And yes it can take several days.

"First Class Mail" is a very specific designation, which bypasses some of the above. But it would still take a couple of days, and it would cost extra since it's a package, not a letter.

If you wanted it sooner you might have been able to request that the company send it to you priority or 2nd day, but you would've had to pay extra for that.

Originally Posted by Jazuela (Post 1607566)

I think you're not understanding how shipping and mail service works, at all. The person who sent the package to you via USPS determines HOW it gets sent to you. It sounds like they sent it non-priority ground. Or possibly even book rate, which is slower. What happens is - the company sends the post office a request for a shipping label. This happens electronically. The label is printed at the company, and the post office now has notification that there's a pickup needed. Some time within the next 24 hours, the post office goes to the company *specifically* to pick up packages (this isn't drop-off, it's pickup). You would have received notification that shipping label was printed, the day before.

Then, the post office truck brings the package to his station. Then, his station sends it to the local regional distribution center. Then, the distribution center sends it to the distribution center that includes your state's distribution region in it. Then, that distribution center sends it to the distribution that is assigned to the area where your zip code is located. Then, that distribution center sends it to the post office assigned to your zip code. Then, that post office sorts the mail and sets your package into the bin that gets loaded onto your driver's truck. Then your driver delivers it.

This is how it works, whether it's the company two counties away, two states away, or the guy next door sending you a Christmas card in the mail. If it's book rate or non-priority ground, that is the process. And yes it can take several days.

"First Class Mail" is a very specific designation, which bypasses some of the above. But it would still take a couple of days, and it would cost extra since it's a package, not a letter.

If you wanted it sooner you might have been able to request that the company send it to you priority or 2nd day, but you would've had to pay extra for that.

Originally Posted by BogeyBoy (Post 1607567)

Here are some facts about the Postal Service, read carefully, especially the last item.

Top twelve things you should know | Postal Facts - U.S. Postal Service

The USPS is losing money but it still has cash to keep going. Here is an excerpt from a recent RStreet article regarding the Postal Service's financial situation:

"Nevertheless, thus far, the Postal Service has endured. Its sizable cash holdings ensure—at least in the immediate future— that it will not face a liquidity crisis that forces it to close operations, or to be bailed out by taxpayers."

Interesting article, here's a link if you're interested and don't want to throw around unsubstantiated fake news:

https://www.rstreet.org/wp-content/u...ort-No.-54.pdf

I could go on about mandates from congress that impact the USPS.

Originally Posted by retiredguy123 (Post 1607586)

Not sure what your point is, but the report you referred to says that the USPS has 500,000 employees and 600,000 retirees receiving pensions and health benefits. And, the chart on operating expenses shows a loss, and it is not clear if the operating expenses even include funding for the future pensions and health expenses for the 500,000 future retirees. I know that the postal union always wants to define operating expenses as not including the future and current liability for pensions and retiree health expenses. These are real expenses that should be funded as part of their operating costs. When a Government employee retires, he/she may live 30 or 40 years in retirement and very well could receive benefits during retirement that exceed the total income that they earned while they were working.

Originally Posted by retiredguy123 (Post 1607586)

Not sure what your point is, but the report you referred to says that the USPS has 500,000 employees and 600,000 retirees receiving pensions and health benefits. And, the chart on operating expenses shows a loss, and it is not clear if the operating expenses even include funding for the future pensions and health expenses for the 500,000 future retirees. I know that the postal union always wants to define operating expenses as not including the future and current liability for pensions and retiree health expenses. These are real expenses that should be funded as part of their operating costs. When a Government employee retires, he/she may live 30 or 40 years in retirement and very well could receive benefits during retirement that exceed the total income that they earned while they were working.

Originally Posted by VillageIdiots (Post 1607563)

Don, I think you misread my post. I used pack and ship to send my item to Tampa via UPS (not USPS). And, actually, now that I think of it, I went to the UPS Store, not pack and ship. It cost me 12 bucks and change and got there the next day (morning). It was when the store shipped the replacement item back to me via USPS that the issue started. They sent me a tracking number that showed the item was picked up and in the system on the evening of the 11th. The tracking never showed anything new until last night when it said it was in the Lake Mary distribution center. This morning it said it was in the Lady Lake post office and the delivery date was changed from today to tomorrow. Now, just to make it more interesting, it shows the delivery date as today again and the status is out for delivery. So, will be interesting to see if they bother to come out in the slop to actually get it to me today after all.

Originally Posted by BogeyBoy (Post 1607567)

Here are some facts about the Postal Service, read carefully, especially the last item.

Top twelve things you should know | Postal Facts - U.S. Postal Service

The USPS is losing money but it still has cash to keep going. Here is an excerpt from a recent RStreet article regarding the Postal Service's financial situation:

"Nevertheless, thus far, the Postal Service has endured. Its sizable cash holdings ensure—at least in the immediate future— that it will not face a liquidity crisis that forces it to close operations, or to be bailed out by taxpayers."

Interesting article, here's a link if you're interested and don't want to throw around unsubstantiated fake news:

https://www.rstreet.org/wp-content/u...ort-No.-54.pdf

I could go on about mandates from congress that impact the USPS.

Originally Posted by JoMar (Post 1607616)

If you read The Hill they project that at the current rate of loss and with Congress continuing it's mandates the tax payers will need to bail out the Post Office. My inference that they were doing that now was incorrect, but I believe it's coming.