The OP's directs comments only to the damage done by Obama relating to the Muslim issue.

However Obama has allowed a Marxist cultural agenda to flourish which is very divisive. The feminist push for women in combat is going to wreak havoc on our ability to defend ourselves.
This coupled with the demands from the homosexual community. Now he adds transgender who demand that the government pay for their medical sexual reassignment. what will Obama do when transgenders demand the right to march in red high heel shoes?

Obama's also works with those who want to destroy our Christian Judeo beliefs

On Obama's visit to Japan he used is famous speech code to apologize for Truman's decision to drop the bomb. How did he do it "using moral equivalency" Japan raped blundered and muer masses at Naking, dropped bombs on Pearl Harbor. Their treatment of American prisoners was to say the least barbaric. Yet he blamed America for its actions in WWII. apparently history is not his strong point

Obama's agenda was clear before he was first elected. Progressives again did their ready fire aim routine. they wanted to elect the first black president but in their haste they forgot that a president must be qualified , represent all of the people and work for the betterment of this nation. Obama missed the mark by a mile on all counts.

Now progressive believe their mission is to elect the first female president...the logic escapes me. One wonders how does black or female equate to qualified what do you suppose is in this mix that by sheer color or gender makes such a person far superior?

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

The OP's directs comments only to the damage done by Obama relating to the Muslim issue.

However Obama has allowed a Marxist cultural agenda to flourish which is very divisive. The feminist push for women in combat is going to wreak havoc on our ability to defend ourselves.
This coupled with the demands from the homosexual community. Now he adds transgender who demand that the government pay for their medical sexual reassignment. what will Obama do when transgenders demand the right to march in red high heel shoes?

Obama's also works with those who want to destroy our Christian Judeo beliefs

On Obama's visit to Japan he used is famous speech code to apologize for Truman's decision to drop the bomb. How did he do it "using moral equivalency" Japan raped blundered and muer masses at Naking, dropped bombs on Pearl Harbor. Their treatment of American prisoners was to say the least barbaric. Yet he blamed America for its actions in WWII. apparently history is not his strong point

Obama's agenda was clear before he was first elected. Progressives again did their ready fire aim routine. they wanted to elect the first black president but in their haste they forgot that a president must be qualified , represent all of the people and work for the betterment of this nation. Obama missed the mark by a mile on all counts.

Now progressive believe their mission is to elect the first female president...the logic escapes me. One wonders how does black or female equate to qualified what do you suppose is in this mix that by sheer color or gender makes such a person far superior?

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

The OP's directs comments only to the damage done by Obama relating to the Muslim issue.

However Obama has allowed a Marxist cultural agenda to flourish which is very divisive. The feminist push for women in combat is going to wreak havoc on our ability to defend ourselves.
This coupled with the demands from the homosexual community. Now he adds transgender who demand that the government pay for their medical sexual reassignment. what will Obama do when transgenders demand the right to march in red high heel shoes?

Obama's also works with those who want to destroy our Christian Judeo beliefs

On Obama's visit to Japan he used is famous speech code to apologize for Truman's decision to drop the bomb. How did he do it "using moral equivalency" Japan raped blundered and muer masses at Naking, dropped bombs on Pearl Harbor. Their treatment of American prisoners was to say the least barbaric. Yet he blamed America for its actions in WWII. apparently history is not his strong point

Obama's agenda was clear before he was first elected. Progressives again did their ready fire aim routine. they wanted to elect the first black president but in their haste they forgot that a president must be qualified , represent all of the people and work for the betterment of this nation. Obama missed the mark by a mile on all counts.

Now progressive believe their mission is to elect the first female president...the logic escapes me. One wonders how does black or female equate to qualified what do you suppose is in this mix that by sheer color or gender makes such a person far superior?

Personal Best Regards:

You will have the next eight years to continue your rants and ravings against "progressives".

As for gender or race making for the best person, it does not. However, when compared to Donald Trump, the female presumptive candidate is the better person. Also, when compared to Donald Trump, the current President is a far better human being than Trump.

Now, have a good day.

Originally Posted by Guest

You will have the next eight years to continue your rants and ravings against "progressives".

As for gender or race making for the best person, it does not. However, when compared to Donald Trump, the female presumptive candidate is the better person. Also, when compared to Donald Trump, the current President is a far better human being than Trump.

Now, have a good day.

Either you are low on your meds, overdosed or are just ignorant if you think that Hillary is a good choice for America or that Obama did a good job. Either way, your credibility is non-existent.

Originally Posted by Guest

Either you are low on your meds, overdosed or are just ignorant if you think that Hillary is a good choice for America or that Obama did a good job. Either way, your credibility is non-existent.

...and the same right back at you since you are totally out of whack if you would want Trump as the President.

Foreign countries do not respect Trunp. He has already been banned from visiting Scotland. Yes, he would like to go there as he owns some premier golf courses there.

Originally Posted by Guest

...and the same right back at you since you are totally out of whack if you would want Trump as the President.

Foreign countries do not respect Trunp. He has already been banned from visiting Scotland. Yes, he would like to go there as he owns some premier golf courses there.

I do not like Trump, but will vote for him. His vote is to keep the criminal Clintons out of the White House. Of course, the other countries love the Clintons. She has sold half of America away as SecState. They lover her, especially Russia, since she sold our uranium to them.

Yep, I'll take Trump over any Clinton.
Hillary CLinton is a scumbag liar, tax cheat and national security threat and should be in jail by now. If not for her husband being a former president, she would be in jail.

Originally Posted by Guest

Foreign countries do not respect Trump.

not exactly true--Russia and North Korea are fans
I think he likes Cuba and they like him too.
Trump: I'd open a hotel in Cuba | TheHill

There you go...voting for the lesser of two evils again...and again...and again...when there ARE other choices.

YOU choose the president, don't let them do it for you.

Originally Posted by Guest

There you go...voting for the lesser of two evils again...and again...and again...when there ARE other choices.

YOU choose the president, don't let them do it for you.

It takes a majority to win an election. I would vote for the only person that I totally trust, but other than family, I doubt my vote for myself would mean much.

Yes, of course I vote for the least of the bad, but I also vote party because it is of MY ideology, or the closest of the two. In my party, I would hope that a felon and threat to national security would not get nominated. I would also hope that we would not invite a socialist into our primaries. But, that is just another reason I won't vote for the other side. We have enough liberals in our party, that I don't need to totally immerse myself with the ultra radicals on the left. In my opinion, the GOP, and Trump are not conservative enough. But, I also realize that our party is always the one that has to compromise in order to get anything done. So, Republicans are required to compromise by moving to the middle-left in order to get any conservative ideas pushed. Americans are a fickle lot, not ever knowing what they really want or what is good for them. They ALL want a Utopia, but there is no such thing.

Which party is closest to giving me these:

Balanced budget, lower national debt
More employed citizens, not working for the government
Freedom of speech without worrying about PC
Freedom to own weapons for hunting,sport and defense
Equal percentage of tax obligation, not some paying all and others paying none.
Strong military presence
Enforced law without handicapping the police
Less regulations/laws restricting our lives
Strong punishment for crimes committed
Strong borders and enforce penalties for hiring illegals
Do not allow illegals to enter into any of our public schools, including colleges.
Do not allow illegals to obtain drivers licenses
Any illegal caught violating a law will be deported if not incarcerated.
Allow states to handle their own social problems, not the Feds.

Between the two parties, only one supports most of that, and it is not the Democratic socialist party.